...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #281  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:21 PM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 10,988
Thanks: 3,232
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,967 Posts
Default

Seems like a 700+ crank hp motor.
__________________
Skip
Reply With Quote
  #282  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:25 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by compos mentis View Post
Seems like a 700+ crank hp motor.
Some have thought that.. but it really isn't a crazy huge camshaft.. I'm sorta more hoping for 650 and 620tq with a ton of that twist down low and in the the midrange.

700 is a bit much.. I could have gotten then with a more aggressive cam, but I want to keep my street manners.

243/259 .624 114LSA
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #283  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:47 PM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 10,988
Thanks: 3,232
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,967 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
Some have thought that.. but it really isn't a crazy huge camshaft.. I'm sorta more hoping for 650 and 620tq with a ton of that twist down low and in the the midrange.

700 is a bit much.. I could have gotten then with a more aggressive cam, but I want to keep my street manners.

243/259 .624 114LSA
It will be fun to hear how it transforms the car on the track.

Should be an interesting dyno session. I think most were surprised when you made 499 hp with that little LS for Track Rat.
__________________
Skip
Reply With Quote
  #284  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:51 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by compos mentis View Post
It will be fun to hear how it transforms the car on the track.

Should be an interesting dyno session. I think most were surprised when you made 499 hp with that little LS for Track Rat.
Yea, me too.. lol

I will be curious when we chassis dyno TR to see if the RW numbers jive with the engine dyno numbers..

Then again.. you almost have to try these days NOT to make 500 HP with an LS engine.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #285  
Old 03-30-2010, 10:00 PM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 10,988
Thanks: 3,232
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,967 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
Some have thought that.. but it really isn't a crazy huge camshaft.. I'm sorta more hoping for 650 and 620tq with a ton of that twist down low and in the the midrange.

700 is a bit much.. I could have gotten then with a more aggressive cam, but I want to keep my street manners.

243/259 .624 114LSA
Not doubting the choice in cams, just interested in what info was used to choose those cam specs?
__________________
Skip
Reply With Quote
  #286  
Old 03-30-2010, 11:49 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Beautiful motor. I'm gonna guess 672hp and 638 ft#s.

Giddyup.
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #287  
Old 03-31-2010, 06:42 AM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thumbs up

Very nice Steve!!!
I'm going to guess anywhere between 650 and 675 ponies. GOOD LUCK!
Reply With Quote
  #288  
Old 03-31-2010, 07:05 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by compos mentis View Post
Not doubting the choice in cams, just interested in what info was used to choose those cam specs?
Talking with the guys over at COMP.. they have some really sharp LS guys. The cam for the 460 I'm building next is just a touch bigger.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #289  
Old 03-31-2010, 07:38 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I don't know if the ATI balancer is new but make sure the bolts that hold it together don't stick out far enough to throw your crank pulley out of alignment. I had to add one brake caliper shim between the pulley and balancer. Just a friendly heads up. If you can feel them with your finger nail, you better shim it.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #290  
Old 03-31-2010, 07:58 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
I don't know if the ATI balancer is new but make sure the bolts that hold it together don't stick out far enough to throw your crank pulley out of alignment. I had to add one brake caliper shim between the pulley and balancer. Just a friendly heads up. If you can feel them with your finger nail, you better shim it.
LS engines.. at least mine, don't have crank pullys.. the belt rides on the dampner itself.

But yea, with a pulley I can see where that would be a problem.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net