Quote:
Originally Posted by DocJr
I was waiting on you to finish it up Colter!
LOVE IT.
|
Yeah I kinda left it hangin there for awhile but I'm glad you stayed with it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by tones2SS
Looks good. Actually, looks A LOT better than what they have on the road at the moment. I'm not really feeling the '10's at all. It's like a box on wheels, in my opinion.
|
I like the Camaro, I'd still buy a Mustang (if I were going to buy something like that). The Camaro has some cool design going on and IMO, from a design standpoint, it actually updated the retro part into a modern car rather than just duplicating them in different proportions like that one car *cough* Challenger *cough*. But they are a box on wheels and lots of new cars are. I'm not sure if it's fair to blame the designers or the safety features or both or something else but I agree anyway. The first 2 things that come to mind that make it look even more like a box are huge, truncated wheel openings that engulf the entire side of the car; and short nose (we all know how much dead space there is between our grille and rad or rad and engine in our old cars - not today). So those are the first 2 things I tackled and that is the reasoning behind the result. The nose is stretched probably an inch and a half and then the lower valance is obviously pushed in just as much from stock, or more. I think that takes a lot of the bulky look out of the front. And if I were at GM rebuilding this thing I'd make it real simple - if it's supposed to stick out, make it stick out more and the opposite for everything else. Fender flares, the rear "hip", the nose etc would just be stretched a little. Then take everything else and shrink it down, take out the bulk. And as you can see I'd ditch most stick on crap. It's like they just keep adding on to the front valance until it is nearly touching the ground. Anyway, blah blah blah right?