...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-29-2010, 02:02 AM
SS1156's Avatar
SS1156 SS1156 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is the L92 easier to get used? Are there any differences in building up either of them? I was thinking of installing a L92 into this 70 Camaro if the deal goes through and was wondering how difficult the install will be. I planned on going through the L92 and going with a larger cam, nice set of heads and I really wanted to keep the EFI on it as well. Would it be easier to get an LS3 that already has decent HP and just install that? Sorry for all the questions, but I am trying to learn as much as I can.
__________________
SOLD 1993 Saleen Mustang #20 of 56, Black & Gold sittin on 17" Sterns.
FQuick: www.fquick.com/ss1156
*New car 1970 Camaro SS clone*
* Soon to be under construction*
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2010, 05:00 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Stock heads are great as is, add hardened push rods, car intake, ls7 cam, good valve springs, headers and you have 500 HP.
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-29-2010, 06:38 AM
71RS/SS396's Avatar
71RS/SS396 71RS/SS396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wake Forest,NC
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

As stated the L-92 heads are great as is, but if it's an 07 change the valves they had problems with the stock valves breaking that year. Check with Mast Motorsports from cams/limiters to take advantage of the VVT.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-29-2010, 07:10 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

On street motors unnder 420" I like the stock heads better then worked heads.
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2010, 08:42 AM
Pantera EFI Pantera EFI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default L-92 = Ok

We have sold our ECU-882C-1 to WaterThunder.com for over 400 L-92 engines that Dave "refits" into Air Boats.

This is what I found:

The stock weight valves will "rev" to over 7000 RPM without breakage.
The Truck Intake is always changed to the LS-3 Corvette Intake.
The Valve Springs are always replaced with "yellow" springs OR "duals" when cam lift exceeds the "yellows" .580" safe lift.
When VVT is operational (pin lock disengaged) the Pantera EFI "limiter" is used to limit Retard/Advance.
(be aware, Comps will allow for FULL ADVANCE to 4 degree Advance ONLY)
The Fuel Injector size is increased in some cases.
The Reluctor to Crankshaft reference needs to be +1.75 to +1.50. (stock reference is retarded)
Safety dictates REMOVAL of the DBW throttle body electric motor with a DBC shaft.
Ignition timing needs to modest, in the 28 degree range.

Remember the L-92 has a HIGH VOLUME oil pump the can empty some "after market" oil pans.

Lance
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2010, 09:44 AM
Ron in SoCal's Avatar
Ron in SoCal Ron in SoCal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,044
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Default

There's a comment I hadn't heard before...why does safety dictate removal of the DBW? I was planning on using it.
__________________
Ron in SoCal
69 Camaro in progress
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=31246

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2010, 10:01 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flash911 View Post
There's a comment I hadn't heard before...why does safety dictate removal of the DBW? I was planning on using it.
The drive by wire is of zero concern is a factory ECM is used. 99% of the LS motors we sell and install use a factory / GMPP ECM.

As Pantera mentions, I too have concerns with aftermarket ECMs and DBW even though some aftermarket systems do have DBW capabilities.
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-01-2010, 07:43 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Good info Lance!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net