...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2010, 02:42 PM
funcars funcars is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the ideas. I have a 91 M5 with a similiar part and understand what you are getting at. I have also seen dogbones with two spherical bearings which is similiar in concept as well. I was not entirely clear on what you meant by needing another lateral locating link though. Do you mean that the torque arm could move sideways and down instead of purely front to rear (a twisting motion)?

Thanks again
__________________
1970 Mach I 380 Dry Sump + lots of mods
1990 C4 Corvette 400 in solid roller
1965 Corvette - back to life some day
1970 1/2 Z28 project car
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2010, 08:30 PM
exwestracer's Avatar
exwestracer exwestracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 83
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funcars View Post
Thanks for the ideas. I have a 91 M5 with a similiar part and understand what you are getting at. I have also seen dogbones with two spherical bearings which is similiar in concept as well. I was not entirely clear on what you meant by needing another lateral locating link though. Do you mean that the torque arm could move sideways and down instead of purely front to rear (a twisting motion)?

Thanks again
Exactly. There is nothing preventing it from "folding" over to the limit of the spehricals when you hit the brakes.
__________________
Ray Kaufman-Wyotech chassis fab instructor
Custom suspension design and consultation.
(Now 2) Big Block asphalt supermodified ('cause too much is never enough...)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2010, 04:48 AM
ProTouring442's Avatar
ProTouring442 ProTouring442 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Harriman, TN
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 19
Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funcars View Post
Thanks for the ideas. I have a 91 M5 with a similar part and understand what you are getting at.
An M5 eh? Nice! I have a '93 M5 in Calypso Red.

Quote:
Originally Posted by exwestracer View Post
Exactly. There is nothing preventing it from "folding" over to the limit of the spehricals when you hit the brakes.
I'm confused here... why would braking exert a force on the arm other than a downward motion? Obviously there will be twisting of the arm depending on the individual height of the rear wheels, but for the arm to flop over, wouldn't the axle need to be radically off kilter?

Shiny Side Up!
Bill
__________________
You ever wonder what medieval cook looked at the guts of a pig and thought, "I bet if you washed out that poop tube, you could stuff it with meat and eat it."

Last edited by ProTouring442; 10-15-2010 at 04:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2010, 09:56 PM
exwestracer's Avatar
exwestracer exwestracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 83
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProTouring442 View Post
An M5 eh? Nice! I have a '93 M5 in Calypso Red.



I'm confused here... why would braking exert a force on the arm other than a downward motion? Obviously there will be twisting of the arm depending on the individual height of the rear wheels, but for the arm to flop over, wouldn't the axle need to be radically off kilter?

Shiny Side Up!
Bill
You're right, braking force is directly the opposite of acceleration, but it's a LOT of force, and with spherical bearings, there is nothing holding them in alignment with the "dog bone". Take 2 big ball bearings, set them one on top of the other, and press down really hard. They will shoot out to the side. Same sort of deal.
__________________
Ray Kaufman-Wyotech chassis fab instructor
Custom suspension design and consultation.
(Now 2) Big Block asphalt supermodified ('cause too much is never enough...)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2010, 05:23 AM
ProTouring442's Avatar
ProTouring442 ProTouring442 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Harriman, TN
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 19
Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by exwestracer View Post
You're right, braking force is directly the opposite of acceleration, but it's a LOT of force, and with spherical bearings, there is nothing holding them in alignment with the "dog bone". Take 2 big ball bearings, set them one on top of the other, and press down really hard. They will shoot out to the side. Same sort of deal.
Ah! Got it! Thanks!!

Shiny Side Up!
Bill
__________________
You ever wonder what medieval cook looked at the guts of a pig and thought, "I bet if you washed out that poop tube, you could stuff it with meat and eat it."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2010, 08:44 PM
funcars funcars is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

I like the idea of allowing some movement of the front of the torque arm to prevent binding/bending (from the roll axis location). Can you show an example of the second link? I do like the small dogbone from the BMW, but I don't want to over-constrain the torque arm front if it isn't needed either. Another approach would be to use some type of limiters or stops I guess.
__________________
1970 Mach I 380 Dry Sump + lots of mods
1990 C4 Corvette 400 in solid roller
1965 Corvette - back to life some day
1970 1/2 Z28 project car
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2010, 09:39 PM
exwestracer's Avatar
exwestracer exwestracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 83
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funcars View Post
I like the idea of allowing some movement of the front of the torque arm to prevent binding/bending (from the roll axis location). Can you show an example of the second link? I do like the small dogbone from the BMW, but I don't want to over-constrain the torque arm front if it isn't needed either. Another approach would be to use some type of limiters or stops I guess.


Here's an example of the side link. It doesn't restrain the arm in roll at all. Don't mind the coilover...this one is on a dirt late model.
__________________
Ray Kaufman-Wyotech chassis fab instructor
Custom suspension design and consultation.
(Now 2) Big Block asphalt supermodified ('cause too much is never enough...)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2010, 03:29 AM
jake72ss jake72ss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

what would be wrong with building the end of the torque arm like Griggs does
http://www.howardweb.org/fastgt/docs/griggs_arm2.jpg http://www.griggsracing.com/images/MTA1000RST.jpg

it looks like the hole in the crossmember is a bit larger than the sleeve and that allows the torque arm to slide front to rear and side to side.

Would this have any downsides?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net