...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2011, 02:08 PM
speedshftr speedshftr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 567
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

everyone makes valid points.i took them off cause i wanted the smooth look down the side.i think it should be okay without them.67 dont have them and body style is identicle.this car will probably never be on the freeway at night and will basically only be used on sunny weekends.today i ran the wires to the four corners.ill post up some pics when i get done my scabwork.ill make sure to tell my agent from grundy or haggerty when i switch .
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2011, 03:13 PM
SAR Skipper SAR Skipper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedshftr View Post
everyone makes valid points.i took them off cause i wanted the smooth look down the side.i think it should be okay without them.67 dont have them and body style is identicle.this car will probably never be on the freeway at night and will basically only be used on sunny weekends.today i ran the wires to the four corners.ill post up some pics when i get done my scabwork.ill make sure to tell my agent from grundy or haggerty when i switch .
I don't blame you for the smooth look. It's a very nice touch.
The DMV is being "by the book" and I guess I can't fault them for that.
It unfortunately seems to be a matter of one years difference in the regs.

Look forward to seeing your solution.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2011, 04:35 PM
The WidowMaker's Avatar
The WidowMaker The WidowMaker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 773
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
With the exception of heavy haze/fog/rain, and that does have to be considered and may make a difference with the markers, there's just not much there that markers can resolve.

If I failed to yield, the side markers are a moot issue.
If you failed to yield, again, the side markers are likely to become a moot or very minimal issue.
i guess in a round about way, that was my point. pretty common sense that they wont play an issue. the common sense gets skewed after you lawyers get involved . all valid points, and i do appreciate your expert input.

to the op, did you figure out what the law requires? do they just need to be a reflector, or do they need to be a light?
__________________
"The WidowMaker"
70 Chevelle Pro Touring - Garage Built, Backyard Painted
Custom 4 Link & Watts, Rushforth Wheels, Ats Spindles, McLeod RXT Twin Clutch, T56 Magnum, C6Z Calipers & Ring Bros Hinges
Special Thanks To: Rushforth Wheels ; Kore3 ; SC&C
Build Thread : https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...ght=widowmaker
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2011, 04:44 AM
SAR Skipper SAR Skipper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
Easy, they look over their shoulder and don't see you.
I see what you mean (no pun intended), but if they can't see the car when they turn their head, they're not going to see the side marker lights either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The WidowMaker View Post
...pretty common sense that they wont play an issue.
I agree.

Quote:
...the common sense gets skewed after you lawyers get involved . all valid points, and i do appreciate your expert input.
A truer statement has ever been uttered!

FWIW, I'm not a lawyer.
I actually have a soul
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net