...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-2011, 12:02 PM
clay69camaro's Avatar
clay69camaro clay69camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default Anyone using E85

I have a Subaru STI and on the forums for those cars there are some people turning out really high hp numbers by switching over to E85.

They also get larger fuel pumps, and really big injectors. Then with the right tune they crank out more hp with less boost, and if they turn the boost up they really crank out more hp.

I myself will be doing it with my STI. on 91+methanol I made 374awhp, but with E85 I'm hoping to hit mid 400's!

I was wondering if that was also a common trend among the classic cars? I haven't seen much of it on here.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-06-2011, 12:09 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

I am considering it and have been closely watching the list of E85 stations in Northern California... it has saturated my area decently but not quite enough for me to convert. I would really like to do this... 105 octane for $3.30 a gallon sounds nice right now.
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2011, 05:20 PM
64duece 64duece is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Yep...been running it about a year or so on a twin turbo 570" bbc. Honestly, I haven't really pushed the tune to take advantage of it (more timing or boost). It's reasonably priced and offers up plenty of "head room" for saftey sake if vs pump gas. We run non-intercooled although have water/meth injection so...advantage goes to the cooler air charge affects aswell.
__________________
Dennis
Moore Racecraft
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-2011, 06:08 PM
clay69camaro's Avatar
clay69camaro clay69camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default

Nice, Are there still benefits to running E85 on a naturally aspirated build?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:33 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clay69camaro View Post
Nice, Are there still benefits to running E85 on a naturally aspirated build?
Absolutely. It's really 2 parts of analysis in my mind... one is the octane benefit (105 vs 91 for us in Calif). But then it does consume more fuel apples to apples compared to pump gas, but I don't know about you... I would not care if my MPG went from the current 10 down to 7 or 8. I'll take the ability to tune for more power based on the 105 octane rating.
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:37 PM
skatinjay27's Avatar
skatinjay27 skatinjay27 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 1,778
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

isn't that 105 rating not a minimum like regular fuels numbers are?
__________________
AJ

1970 1/2 rs z28...pro-touring?...i wish...soon?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net