...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 12-17-2011, 11:42 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironworks View Post
Just putting it out there. HAHA
Get back to work! And it would be ready!
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-18-2011, 06:35 AM
toddshotrods's Avatar
toddshotrods toddshotrods is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironworks View Post
Just to be clear Columbus 2013, not 2012. We can take the 32 this year.
That's a good start. The right side of the country needs to catch up on "The Weld Collection" anyway.
__________________
Todd Perkins Design

Last edited by toddshotrods; 12-18-2011 at 06:36 AM. Reason: wrong side - forgot where I live
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-18-2011, 06:53 AM
Fluid Power's Avatar
Fluid Power Fluid Power is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,029
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Anyway -- back to the thread -- RODGER is right on about the intent of the build -- a '62 Bubble Top S63 AMG. It doesn't need a 572 twin turbo rat-a-tat-tat motor it just needs massive torque... paddle shifted 4L80E... kinda fat tires - great interior - a color combo that says inviting, classy, & badass like a high end call girl... and just enough rumble to get noticed. The doors have to shut like my S63... and it has to have a compliant but capable ride (Ironworks new chassis!). Don't look for it on the autocross... look for it on the highway and on Power Tour. [/QUOTE]


Greg, I think you are spot on. I am so looking forward to this car. The details are perfect and I love the fact that the exhaust note will be subtle. I think a lot of guys that build cars similar to this ruin them by putting the big rumpty rump exhaust on them when understated power suits the build style so much better. The AMG or M5/M6 exhaust note is spot on!

I think I came a little when I saw Roger started a build thread on this!

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 12-18-2011, 07:31 AM
cencalc6 cencalc6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Fresno Ca
Posts: 562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Excellent choice of car.....I've always wanted a 62 Bel-Air....By the looks of it on that rendering, is going to be a Very Sweet looking Ride
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 12-18-2011, 09:29 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluid Power View Post
Anyway -- back to the thread -- RODGER is right on about the intent of the build -- a '62 Bubble Top S63 AMG. It doesn't need a 572 twin turbo rat-a-tat-tat motor it just needs massive torque... paddle shifted 4L80E... kinda fat tires - great interior - a color combo that says inviting, classy, & badass like a high end call girl... and just enough rumble to get noticed. The doors have to shut like my S63... and it has to have a compliant but capable ride (Ironworks new chassis!). Don't look for it on the autocross... look for it on the highway and on Power Tour.

Greg, I think you are spot on. I am so looking forward to this car. The details are perfect and I love the fact that the exhaust note will be subtle. I think a lot of guys that build cars similar to this ruin them by putting the big rumpty rump exhaust on them when understated power suits the build style so much better. The AMG or M5/M6 exhaust note is spot on!

I think I came a little when I saw Roger started a build thread on this!

Darren[/QUOTE]


Yeah -- At one point I called "The Rajah" (as Skip calls him ) and said - lets put a NRE TT 572 in it... it's a big car with a huge engine compartment! But then he talked me off the ledge and we re-hashed the "intent".... And the intent is to put a bunch of miles on it - have it at all the major shows and prove the chassis... Plus get enough "attention" that people will want to see what Ironworks builds....
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 12-18-2011, 11:45 AM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member and Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 11,167
Thanks: 3,375
Thanked 3,596 Times in 2,134 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post

Yeah -- At one point I called "The Rajah" (as Skip calls him ) and said - lets put a NRE TT 572 in it... it's a big car with a huge engine compartment! But then he talked me off the ledge and we re-hashed the "intent".... And the intent is to put a bunch of miles on it - have it at all the major shows and prove the chassis... Plus get enough "attention" that people will want to see what Ironworks builds....

" Raja (also spelled rajah, from Sanskrit राज rāja- and Urdu: ... is an Indian term for a monarch, or princely ruler of the Kshatriya varna."

Good to see Wikipedia has high (or tall? ) regard for the 'The Rajah'.


Greg, regarding the exhaust note ...I know you want to keep it low key. I like the deep, throaty sound many of the stock GM LS exhaust systems have.

A number of aftermarket systems I've heard seem to have lost that.
__________________
Skip
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 12-19-2011, 02:09 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by compos mentis View Post
Greg, regarding the exhaust note ...I know you want to keep it low key. I like the deep, throaty sound many of the stock GM LS exhaust systems have.

A number of aftermarket systems I've heard seem to have lost that.

If it ended up sounding just like my S63 - I'd be thrilled! It "rumbles" but never intrudes into the cabin - but jump on it - it gets loud but very deep throated.

Some of these exhausts sound like meat grinders on steroids.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 12-19-2011, 02:11 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

I forgot to add --- the exhaust (stock) on my M5 (10 cylinder) was THE WORST exhaust sound in the history of the universe. That was just ONE of the many reasons I sold it 6 months after I bought it. What a nasty sounding little motor! Total Ricer.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 12-19-2011, 02:38 PM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member and Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 11,167
Thanks: 3,375
Thanked 3,596 Times in 2,134 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
If it ended up sounding just like my S63 - I'd be thrilled! It "rumbles" but never intrudes into the cabin - but jump on it - it gets loud but very deep throated.

Some of these exhausts sound like meat grinders on steroids.
AMG's have great sounding exhausts for stockers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
I forgot to add --- the exhaust (stock) on my M5 (10 cylinder) was THE WORST exhaust sound in the history of the universe. That was just ONE of the many reasons I sold it 6 months after I bought it. What a nasty sounding little motor! Total Ricer.
Heard 'em...they were bad.

Gratuitous Chicayne pic...since this is a '62 build thread after all.

Can't tell from here for sure, but it looks like the upper body color may be gray.





BTW- are you guys planning to whack the roof a little?
__________________
Skip
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 12-19-2011, 02:50 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Still can't figure out why they used the ugly body (a post) for that build...

Rajah will have to answer the roof whacking question... we've talked about it - but I'm really trying to stay away from a bunch of useless money wasting body mods... I just don't think the car needs much. "Much" being the operative word.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net