...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 12-09-2011, 09:52 AM
Cris@JCG's Avatar
Cris@JCG Cris@JCG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Big motor for only 302 CI.. I like the way a Coyote would look in a engine bay.. but packaging is tough.. The LS engine is an all around good motor that can build some serious HP & close to being the same size as a gen 1 SBC..

Right now I still have plans to make sure that what ever custom work I do to fit the LS engine.. also works for the Coyote.. on the x-member & engine mounts... If not I got a 67 FB that I will fit it in that I can cut it all up to proof fitment.. I got alot Mustang stuff going on.. Plus Mopar stuff that I will be working on in mid January.. I might be getting a 70 Cuda Prototype re-production shell to play with..




Quote:
Originally Posted by GrabberGT View Post
I hate the idea of an LS in a Ford. Those things are in everything. But there is a reason. What was Ford thinking going with such a large engine? I think the Coyote even out does the Boss 429 when it comes to space requirements. They try to market it as a motor for your project but there arent many cars out there that dont require a complete custom front end to make the thing fit.

Skip- I have seen this thread... Thank you for the info..

Quote:
Originally Posted by compos mentis View Post
Cris, if you haven't seen this finished build already, these guys swapped a Coyote into the smaller 66 'Stang.

http://www.pro-touring.com/showthrea...ersion-Project

__________________
Cris Gonzalez
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 12-09-2011, 10:12 AM
GrabberGT's Avatar
GrabberGT GrabberGT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzo View Post
Big motor for only 302 CI.. I like the way a Coyote would look in a engine bay.. but packaging is tough.. The LS engine is an all around good motor that can build some serious HP & close to being the same size as a gen 1 SBC..

Right now I still have plans to make sure that what ever custom work I do to fit the LS engine.. also works for the Coyote.. on the x-member & engine mounts... If not I got a 67 FB that I will fit it in that I can cut it all up to proof fitment.. I got alot Mustang stuff going on.. Plus Mopar stuff that I will be working on in mid January.. I might be getting a 70 Cuda Prototype re-production shell to play with..







Skip- I have seen this thread... Thank you for the info..
Oddly enough, the same day I post this, over on the Maverick forum (yes it does exist) somebody posted pics of a Mav with a Coyote in it. The Mav engine bay is smaller than the Mustang. I'll just say that the Coyote certainly has presence.
__________________
Chris

Its not a Vega!!!!

Total Cost Involved - Total Control Products - Gateway Performance - Fatman - MaverickMan Carbon
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 12-09-2011, 02:23 PM
56pickup's Avatar
56pickup 56pickup is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 455
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Cris hope to see that coyote go in there! I just dont like seeing a chevrolet motor in a ford.

PS. if you end up getting rid of the coyote i might be interested in the dynatech headers
__________________
Tyler
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 12-09-2011, 07:09 PM
Cris@JCG's Avatar
Cris@JCG Cris@JCG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

With all the changes going on this Mustang.. I feel like we got something done this week on her! We got most of the main floor structure back in place with Firewall.. though we cut a part of it out.. Got the doors back on the car with the front Anvil 1.5 stretched fenders.. Got the LS with T56 staged between the frame rails.. got plenty of room now.. Looks like the 1st gen Camaro LS headers from Dynatech will work.. We moved the motor as far back as we could.. Some progress







__________________
Cris Gonzalez
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 12-11-2011, 08:21 PM
lilcraigford lilcraigford is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Shame to see the Ford 5.0 didn't work out. Now you're going to have to change the project name.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 01-07-2012, 10:06 AM
Cris@JCG's Avatar
Cris@JCG Cris@JCG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Here are some updates on the Mustang... We got the transmission support going & some firewall work going .. The owner said to keep it simple.. doing my best to keep the project moving forward & trying not to get carried away with crazy fab work & one off machined pcs..

I will post pics later of the firewall with the Wilwood pedal assembly..





__________________
Cris Gonzalez
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 01-07-2012, 06:56 PM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

looking good.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 01-07-2012, 07:17 PM
Cris@JCG's Avatar
Cris@JCG Cris@JCG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Thanks Bryce! This is where we finished off today.. Their is a 1.5 x 1.5 x .120 square tubing built into the frame of the firewall that ties into the new rockers we built & the torque boxes.. I got some cool ideas for the down bars.. got to get some parts machined for that..



Next week I fire up my new toy! Looking forward to the pcs we will be fabricating soon!




Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce View Post
looking good.
__________________
Cris Gonzalez
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 01-07-2012, 07:33 PM
mexMan's Avatar
mexMan mexMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Mochis, Sinaloa
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow, the LS engine looks like it's going to have A LOT of space to play around! Even though it's not my favorite setup, well, that's the client's choice, and still it's a really good choice, considering the economy of an LS engine compared to a 5.0. Dunno, I like it, it's different, and we should wait for the result to be sure if it's for the best or the worst, though I don't think it's for the worst. Shiny side up guys!
__________________
''Every car has a great quality, is not the hands that build it, is the dedication behind it.''
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 01-07-2012, 08:01 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,608
Thanks: 1,707
Thanked 906 Times in 675 Posts
Default

Sorry it's a little late but I was thinking, if the customer wants the LS to look a little less out of place you can do the front mount distributor conversion along with a carb style intake and paint the engine Ford blue. That should really cause some double takes. Just check out RSX302's built on p-t.com Just a thought. Love your work Cris so I know the car is going to turn out great no matter what.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2001 BMW 540iT soon to be manual swapped and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

00 BMW 540i/6: Suspension, wheels, and ACS bits.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net