...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-24-2012, 03:19 PM
itsals1 itsals1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I got alittle time today to call TCI and talk to Sal! Sounds like they are only able to fit a 315 tire not the 335 that I want. He said theres not quite enough room on the 67'-68' camaros with there TA,so I'll be looking more at SpeedTech's TA vs. G-link. Sal's a great guy and sounds like they have great products, just not quite what I want.

Travis
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-24-2012, 04:55 PM
slow4dr's Avatar
slow4dr slow4dr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 556
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsals1 View Post
I got alittle time today to call TCI and talk to Sal! Sounds like they are only able to fit a 315 tire not the 335 that I want. He said theres not quite enough room on the 67'-68' camaros with there TA,so I'll be looking more at SpeedTech's TA vs. G-link. Sal's a great guy and sounds like they have great products, just not quite what I want.

Travis
I am guessing you are running a DSE tub? Even DSE doesn't recommend a 335 tire for a track car on a '67-'68 regardless of what suspension is under it.

-J
__________________
'04 IS300 LS3/TR6060 swap in process
'89 Plymouth Colt GT - 411WHP, 2490lbs & 32mpg
'06 Magnum SRT8 - AFE S2, 3" Flowmaster catback, Diablo Predator (KIA by a drunk driver 10-25-13)
63 Nova 'Low Budget G-Machine' *SOLD*
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-24-2012, 05:13 PM
Chad-1stGen's Avatar
Chad-1stGen Chad-1stGen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 743
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsals1 View Post
I got alittle time today to call TCI and talk to Sal! Sounds like they are only able to fit a 315 tire not the 335 that I want. He said theres not quite enough room on the 67'-68' camaros with there TA,so I'll be looking more at SpeedTech's TA vs. G-link. Sal's a great guy and sounds like they have great products, just not quite what I want.

Travis
Well I've decided to go with the TCI set up which my car is currently undergoing the work to install it and a lot of other stuff. Wish I could report on the results. I will say, I've been very impressed with how well the TCI Camaro has performed at the events I've seen it at in person (RTTC, Goodguys, etc.) which is why I chose their set up.

However, on the 315 vs 335 I question if you and Sal are on the same page. I've had this conversation with Sal multiple times. To me he has made it pretty clear that he recommends the 315 size because of the limitations of the TUB, not the torque arm.

Sal has seen my specific tub job and recommended I stay with a 315 knowing I track the car on road courses and the car will see hard turns at over 100 mph. He personally has measured my wheel wells with 335's mocked up and I'd have good clearance with a 335 but at those speeds and loads he wasn't comfortable with ANY chance of rubbing.
__________________
Autocross and Track blog

Lots of autocross & track day videos of my car: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheDude023
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-25-2012, 06:44 AM
itsals1 itsals1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Chad,
I may have miss understood Sal on the tub vs. TA clearance.
What I'm wondering though is if SpeedTech and RideTech have clearance issues? I've seen the 48 hour Camaro on video and they have 335's and I'm sure Bret has tested it at 100MPH +? Maybe we can get Bret and Blake to give there experience with 335's on the 67'-68' camaros.

Travis
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-25-2012, 08:44 AM
Chad-1stGen's Avatar
Chad-1stGen Chad-1stGen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 743
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Travis, I'm sure Blake or someone from Speedtech and chime in here but I was thinking about this more after I posted yesterday since I don't want to mislead you or anyone else. The only thing I could come up with that would impact tire clearance on the TCI kit vs the Speedtech kit is the crossbar that the coil overs and panhard bar attach to.

The speedtech kit being a weld in kit attaches to the inside and a little bit of the underside of the frame rail only. The TCI kit wraps around both the inside and outside of the frame rail and does have two bolt heads that protrude in that area. So I could see loosing maybe ~ 3/8" of clearance this way.

Of course it is easily solved by welding in this part for the TCI kit. I know on my car we are using countersunk holes and bolt heads in this spot to achieve maximum clearance.

Here is a pic of the TCI kit with a red circle on the area I'm talking about.


Here is a pic of the Speedtech torque arm. See the area I've circled in red.


Hope that helps and good luck with your decision. I doubt you can make a bad one when looking at these torque arm kits.
__________________
Autocross and Track blog

Lots of autocross & track day videos of my car: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheDude023

Last edited by Chad-1stGen; 02-25-2012 at 04:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-25-2012, 02:16 PM
70rs's Avatar
70rs 70rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 3,683
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think at this level it's splitting hairs. All 3 companies are great. I personally have experience with Speed Techs customer service and can say it's fantastic. I can't comment on the others, but hear great things about both.

I do like the way the Speed Tech system installs. And how the arm itself is fabricated. And its performance in a well sorted car speaks for itself.

The Ridetech has great range of adjustment, is very well made and has a proven track record too.

TCI looks to be a well made system with great on track results too.

Figure your budget, ease of install and overall use of the car.
You really can't go wrong with any of them.

But I have to say if it was my choice and my money, I would go with Speed Tech. Unfortunately they don't have a T/A system currently for second gens. (but I hope they do this year . )
__________________
Eric

1970 Camaro.....on the road someday!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-25-2012, 02:19 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Both great companies from experience.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net