...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-14-2012, 09:30 PM
John510's Avatar
John510 John510 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 1,345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazincopper View Post
http://www.checkeredracing.com/62-67Camaro4.html

What do ya'll think about 4 bar kit like the one listed above? Can't beat the price, but how does someting like that stack up to a Chris Alstons G Bar?

I think I have definetly decided to go with coilovers. Now just trying to get the rear suspension figured out before I order everything else.

I'm thinking about the QA1 coilovers all the way around - tubed A arms up front.

Will the adjustable coilovers give me enough height adjustment without using drop spindles?

I wouldn't get drop spindles if I was you. Research the G bar and trust me you won't want it (yes I have one). They are poorly engineered in my opinion. The one you posted above I have never heard of and that is not a good sign....

Get a Ridetech 4 link if you want a bolt in one. Or if you have more $$$ and don't mind cutting up the car get the DSE.
__________________
68 Camaro "Bloodline". OZMO Twin DBW LS3 with TSP 231/236 cam, Speedtech frame, Ridetech coilovers, Chassisworks G Billet/Fab 9, Asanti 19's, Fesler brakes, Carbon Anvil everything, etc.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

65 Fastback "Maddo" @ Meanstreets Performance. Ridetech, crate 306/T5, tubbed, Forgeline
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2012, 09:44 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

If your just going to street drive tubular front control arms will be a huge improvement and all you will need. They will allow for a significant amount of positive caster and neg. camber. Save the rest of your money for brakes and cosmetics.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-14-2012, 09:48 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC71Nova View Post
I'd suggest you give Marcus at SC&C a call. He is very helpful with answering these suspension related questions and has experience with basically every setup being offered today.

If I had it to do over I would not go with a non-traditional coilover setup. Although, hundreds if not thousands have been sold without issue. Including one to me with my primary reason being adjustability. However, realistically the "ride height adjustability" selling point of the coilover is somewhat overplayed. The shocks have a min/max range which limits the overall height adjustment to a pretty small amount. You do get some though so that is good.

The QA1 ProCoil (which I have) you'll read reports of them having issues with leakage that is believed to be caused due to the side loading. I'm not exactly an engineer but it does make sense when you consider the design. Again, keeping the shock in the operating range is critical to prevent premature failure.

The CA and Ridetech coilover conversion uses a style of mount that carries the weight of the front end on a location of the subframe not intended to support that weight. From the OE the spring carried the weight in the upper spring pocket which would at least appear to better handle it. Again, I'm no engineer so this is just internet fodder .

FWIW If I had it to do over I would go with the Speedtech Chicane brackets and a traditional Ridetech coilover spec'd according to my desired ride height and weight. In my opinion this is the BEST coilover solution for a stock subframe.

Oh, and I went with the Speedtech arms which are super nice pieces also. I currently have my eye on the Tru-Turn setup from Ridetech too. Great info been coming out about it.
Marcus knows his business. Give him a call if you want a killer set up on a budget.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-14-2012, 09:51 PM
coolwelder62's Avatar
coolwelder62 coolwelder62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vinland Ks.
Posts: 4,315
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

If you want any kind of qualtiy stay away from the checkered racing stuff.It's pretty ruff looking(I installed some that a customer supplied) would not recomend it.Speed tech or RideTech would really good choice's.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net