...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-25-2012, 01:40 PM
Rhino Rhino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I've not seen either setup in person, but may provide at least a little info.

You'll likely be using coilovers on both setups, so springrate/shock changes would be possible either way.

The advantages you're getting with IRS is the ability to bake in static camber, and realize camber gain through suspension travel. Both of which are utilized to compensate for body roll.
The disadvanges are added cost/complexity.

If you're looking for a compliant ride 90% of the time I would venture a guess that you wouldn't realize a measurable advantage 95% of the time.

You just have to determine if that added cost/complexity is worth it for the 5% of time it would benefit you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net