|
|

05-03-2012, 09:54 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
More power & less weight, but significant enough changes to warrant the expense of building a new car vs. modifying RD...there's something in plain sight that we aren't seeing!
|

05-03-2012, 10:00 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 183
Thanked 164 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sik68
More power & less weight, but significant enough changes to warrant the expense of building a new car vs. modifying RD...there's something in plain sight that we aren't seeing! 
|
More power in a smaller and lighter car...
__________________
Ty Ingle, USAF Retired
FREEDOMBIRD Hoodpins.com, Inland Empire Driveline, Billet Accessories Direct, Modo Innovations, AutoRad Radiators, Morris Classic Concepts, Marquez Design, Anvil Auto, Fesler Billet, US Collision (DOOM), AGR, Pro-touringF-body.com, Phoenix Transmission Products, Shiftworks, ACC Carpet, Hedman Hedders, BMR Fabrication, American Autowire, MityMounts, TIN INDIAN Performance, Kauffman Racing Equipment, Pypes, RobbMc Performance, WMC, Holley, NOS, PST
|

05-03-2012, 10:19 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLDFLM
More power in a smaller and lighter car... 
|
Yep, 67 vs 69 as he said is a lighter platform...maybe 200lbs max between the two? There is aluminum front sheetmetal for a 69 though so there may be something to offset that.
I'm also on pins and needles to see what you're doing with the tire widths...near 50/50 weight distribution with square or nearly square widths?
Oh yeah, PTM...you heard it here first!
Last edited by sik68; 05-03-2012 at 01:20 PM.
|

05-03-2012, 12:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 655
Thanks: 0
Thanked 35 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Time to start moving the drivetrain and passengers backwards in the car.
Whenever I contemplate pro-tour competitive builds, I am alwasy stumped by what you can do to be better than a late model vette- They have us beat on weight distribution, IRS, unsprung weight, aero, and development. If I was building a max effort pro-tour car I think I would just give up and drop a vintage body on a C6 running chassis. Because the down side to the vette of course is you see 5 of them a day even in Seattle.
The other avenue you can pursue of course is the super lightweight approach ie street rod based design or similar. That won't work with the muscle car envelope though.
Well Stielow's builds are always interesting although with his car building experience I'd like to see him push the envelope a bit more. As he's said though the key to much of his success is being fairly conservative overall and simply applying ingenuity to the details.
|

05-03-2012, 01:18 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 183
Thanked 164 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Aluminum core supports are also available (AutoRad) as well as complete CF front clips for these cars... even 2nd Gen Pontiac Firebird/Tran Ams have CF noses, hoods, fenders and doors now!
I'd like to see Mark take advantage of ALL of the weight saving products available from out site sponsors and other vendors!
__________________
Ty Ingle, USAF Retired
FREEDOMBIRD Hoodpins.com, Inland Empire Driveline, Billet Accessories Direct, Modo Innovations, AutoRad Radiators, Morris Classic Concepts, Marquez Design, Anvil Auto, Fesler Billet, US Collision (DOOM), AGR, Pro-touringF-body.com, Phoenix Transmission Products, Shiftworks, ACC Carpet, Hedman Hedders, BMR Fabrication, American Autowire, MityMounts, TIN INDIAN Performance, Kauffman Racing Equipment, Pypes, RobbMc Performance, WMC, Holley, NOS, PST
|

05-03-2012, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Mark, any interest in the GRM Ultimate Track Car Challenge? I know the car wont be ready for this years event but maybe next year?
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Last edited by Track Junky; 05-03-2012 at 03:40 PM.
|

05-03-2012, 04:22 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,044
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLDFLM
Aluminum core supports are also available (AutoRad) as well as complete CF front clips for these cars... even 2nd Gen Pontiac Firebird/Tran Ams have CF noses, hoods, fenders and doors now!
I'd like to see Mark take advantage of ALL of the weight saving products available from out site sponsors and other vendors! 
|
Ty who makes complete first gen carbon fiber clips?
|

05-12-2012, 06:24 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,044
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
99% sure it's lighter Jeff, but may not be significant savings; you can pick that thing up w your pinky. The opening is wider to support their wider radiator...
|

05-13-2012, 05:57 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
No matter what Mark decides, it will be awesome! I think the best part of this build is that its a 67' NOT a 69'. Hopefully will see some of his engineering marvels  for us 67' camaro lovers.
Travis
|

05-13-2012, 07:34 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,044
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
We're saying the same thing Jeff. 12 lbs vs 17. 100lbs = - .10. Not significant, but light enough to pick up w your pinky.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:04 AM.
|