...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 05-27-2012, 11:01 AM
DFRESH's Avatar
DFRESH DFRESH is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: South Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I followed Todd's setup on his car and had great confidence going into the purchase of my G-Bar (Original Version) since it was proven by him at the track and on the street (even though I knew I would need to modify the end links). Like many of you, the fact that there was only a small amount of fabrication required was also a draw.

At the time of this purchase, some others vendors had just come into the market with new designs, specifically Torque arms. When Todd ran into the framerail problem, I knew that at some point my car would also have 335's and track tires like Todds. Now, I know that the framerail issue can be resolved through additional efforts, however, after seeing Speedtech's Nova at RTTC run, and the simplicity of the setup, I will be putting one in my car. It removes the upper bar/framerail stress issue completely for me, allows for the ride height I like, there is very little fabrication, and it is proven on the track as well.

I'm not saying my car doesn't work, it does very well for what its got in it. But I am currently running 300 treadwear tires with 275/35 20's on the rear. It's not putting nearly the stress on the frame through the G-Bar that some 335's and 100 treadwear tires would, thus my frame rails have been ok thus far. I did modify my end links to heim's, but that's it.

At the end of the day, for me, it's what has been proven to work on the track. If it works there, then I have no worries about street miles. Todd's car is the testimony of the G-Bar--how it's worked, and the shortcomings.

The G-Link, after seeing Roger's car and being able to get in it and driving it a few laps through the Auto X, is impressive. However, the fact that both this car and Payback suffered respective framerail issues helped make my decision easier.

Doug
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 05-28-2012, 11:41 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

As some who have installed and run the Speedtech torque arm can confirm there is no floor modifications or cutting that need to be done, The upper shock X member is the only part that requares welding. (if you purchase the complete rear end) the ride height is as low as you can go and still drive the car if you want it that low. It has proven itself on the track and the street as well. and the cost is right in line at 1995.00 that includes the shocks/springs.
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 05-28-2012, 04:30 PM
tmadden's Avatar
tmadden tmadden is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 955
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer69 View Post
As some who have installed and run the Speedtech torque arm can confirm there is no floor modifications or cutting that need to be done, The upper shock X member is the only part that requares welding. (if you purchase the complete rear end) the ride height is as low as you can go and still drive the car if you want it that low. It has proven itself on the track and the street as well. and the cost is right in line at 1995.00 that includes the shocks/springs.
Now you said something!! I'll be calling the 1st of the year!!!
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 05-28-2012, 08:33 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Doug, it's my opinion that any rear suspension design could compromise these paper thin frame rails. I push things until they break or prove themself. I'm not sold that a panhard bar is the answer.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 05-28-2012, 09:02 PM
XLexusTech XLexusTech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 86
Thanked 119 Times in 68 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer69 View Post
As some who have installed and run the Speedtech torque arm can confirm there is no floor modifications or cutting that need to be done, The upper shock X member is the only part that requares welding. (if you purchase the complete rear end) the ride height is as low as you can go and still drive the car if you want it that low. It has proven itself on the track and the street as well. and the cost is right in line at 1995.00 that includes the shocks/springs.
Hi Blake, interested in your Torque Arm Suspension. Looking at the pictures wondering can you use frame connectors?
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:13 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Sure can, I have them in my Nova


you can see them welded into the floor. in this shot.
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com

Last edited by Blake Foster; 05-29-2012 at 11:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 05-29-2012, 06:19 PM
Musclerodz's Avatar
Musclerodz Musclerodz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: washington, ok
Posts: 4,286
Thanks: 22
Thanked 164 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
Doug, it's my opinion that any rear suspension design could compromise these paper thin frame rails. I push things until they break or prove themself. I'm not sold that a panhard bar is the answer.
One of the reasons i like the quadralink so much. plus the panhard mount reinforces the frame rail as apart of the design.
__________________
Mike Redpath
Musclerodz & Customz
facebook page
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 05-29-2012, 07:38 PM
XLexusTech XLexusTech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 86
Thanked 119 Times in 68 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer69 View Post
Sure can, I have them in my Nova


you can see them welded into the floor. in this shot.
cool but how does the connectors front Sub and front torque arm all meet up?
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 05-31-2012, 04:49 PM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Here are some more detailed pictures







hope that shows what your wanting to see.
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 06-12-2012, 09:08 AM
onevoice onevoice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
Doug, it's my opinion that any rear suspension design could compromise these paper thin frame rails. I push things until they break or prove themself. I'm not sold that a panhard bar is the answer.
FYI - Over on PT, there is a thread about a broken DSE panhard bracket, and a report of another. Racing breaks stuff, always check your parts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net