...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > LSX Conversions
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-03-2012, 02:55 PM
Obsin71Ls1 Obsin71Ls1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
. Anytime you add complexity, you decrease reliability.
The same was said when GM went from the proven Gen I/II SBC to the gen III. Direct fuel injection is not anything new and certainly not a cause for concern with regard to reliability.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-04-2012, 08:39 AM
Efi69Cam Efi69Cam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 196
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I don't buy the reliabiliy argument against DI. High pressure DI pumps have been used on diesel engines for a long time.

As Mike said what is going to slow the use of these engines in the hot rod market is the aftermarket support. From what I've read so far the new ECM is locked up pretty tight. That's not say the aftermarket will not step up but it will be awhile.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-21-2012, 04:56 PM
kainedogg's Avatar
kainedogg kainedogg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I can't even afford a crate LS7 yet. I shudder to think what this new motor will cost. On the other hand, if the direct injection allows me to run a lot of boost, with a lot of compression, then when it's tossed into an affordable vehicle (Camaro Z28 LT1 ) I might buy it.
__________________
Science flies you to the Moon, Religion flies you into buildings
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-21-2012, 10:15 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,455
Thanks: 914
Thanked 683 Times in 537 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obsin71Ls1 View Post
The same was said when GM went from the proven Gen I/II SBC to the gen III. Direct fuel injection is not anything new and certainly not a cause for concern with regard to reliability.
GM's had direct injection on the V6 CTS for a while now. I'm unaware of any major issues with that system. I'm with you, I seriously doubt there will be any major reliability issues with the design.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-22-2012, 12:26 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,691
Thanks: 86
Thanked 210 Times in 119 Posts
Default

Time will tell....

I did a quick search and one thing I found is pretty interesting. On a direct injection engine, the intake valve never see's any fuel but they do see dirt, combustion vapor(Oil), and oil from the valve guide. The additives in fuel help keep the back of the valve clean in non direct injected engines. This could lead to drivability issues and additional maintenence.

I also noticed that some direct injected CTS engines suffered timing chain problems. The lobe on the camshaft for the high pressure pump will increase the load and frequency on the chain.
__________________
Todd

Last edited by Vegas69; 11-22-2012 at 12:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-22-2012, 07:44 AM
MarkM66's Avatar
MarkM66 MarkM66 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, DI has been around awhile in gas engines, and so have the problems Todds post states. Not to mention that second fuel pump that's extremely loud , and make the engine sound like a diesel when running, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-28-2012, 08:58 AM
GRob GRob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
Time will tell....

I did a quick search and one thing I found is pretty interesting. On a direct injection engine, the intake valve never see's any fuel but they do see dirt, combustion vapor(Oil), and oil from the valve guide. The additives in fuel help keep the back of the valve clean in non direct injected engines. This could lead to drivability issues and additional maintenence.

I also noticed that some direct injected CTS engines suffered timing chain problems. The lobe on the camshaft for the high pressure pump will increase the load and frequency on the chain.
While this has been true in the past (Audi RS4 anyone?), I believe that this problem is for the most part solved on the current gen DI engines - but yes, it could be a potential issue for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-28-2012, 10:20 AM
Stuart Adams Stuart Adams is offline
Lateral-g Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,046
Thanks: 19
Thanked 62 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Interesting topic. It will be cool to see what shakes out down the road.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net