...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2013, 11:53 AM
chr2002ca's Avatar
chr2002ca chr2002ca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 775
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow, now this shifter too? I know a few folks who changed from the Black Jack shifter to the White Lightning shifter specifically because their Black Jack shifter was leaking. That right there would be irritating. Thanks for sharing this information. I was interested in the White Lightning, but I think I'll just stick with the Tremec shifter and avoid the issues, regardless of upcoming 'revised editions' that don't leak like the first edition should have done. Where's the testing on these products? I guess we're the testers, using our own $$$ of course. Now, if a compay steps up and does a free replacement of the defective first edition with the corrected edition, then they're doing it right.
__________________
Chris Robinson
1969 Camaro SS/RS, 489 ZL-1 MPFI, T-56 Mag

Last edited by chr2002ca; 02-26-2013 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2013, 01:31 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 99 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chr2002ca View Post
Wow, now this shifter too? I know a few folks who changed from the Black Jack shifter to the White Lightning shifter specifically because their Black Jack shifter was leaking. That right there would be irritating. Thanks for sharing this information. I was interested in the White Lightning, but I think I'll just stick with the Tremec shifter and avoid the issues, regardless of upcoming 'revised editions' that don't leak like the first edition should have done. Where's the testing on these products? I guess we're the testers, using our own $$$ of course. Now, if a company steps up and does a free replacement of the defective first edition with the corrected edition, then they're doing it right.
Where the engineering lacked was consideration for utilizing the shifter in forward position which places it over the top of this gear........


A machine fit without an internal seal compounded by an internal case pressure of up to 10 psi won't control the oil slung by that gear.





Now if I hadn't built this cover to gain tunnel clearance which also conveniently serves as a shifter access panel............I'd have been seriously PO'd.



In the rear mounting position neither shifter leak, they just weep a little. So until the new shfter was engineered I'm running the Hurst in the rear position with these tunnel and console plates.




All said, having some redesign insight gives me confidence in Hurst's redesign. Being under the B&M umbrella is good and bad in that they have the resources but the corporate processes take time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net