Quote:
Originally Posted by compos mentis
|
Tightly Priceless Skippah
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld
I just bought a Tamron 10-24 for my Nikon... I wanted to buy the Nikkor version but the Tamron actually has less distortion around the edges..and was half the price... go figure.
http://www.tamron.com/en/photolens/di_II_wide/b001.html
If you've never used it --- try reading about lens on www.KenRockwell.com he has great info and reviews.
Had to add that Ken hates this lens --- but for the kind of photography I do -- it works just fine. For a pro like him - it probably sucks... it just wasn't worth paying almost double for the Nikkor when I couldn't tell the difference.
|
We have a newer Tamron 18-200mm on the wife's Rebel and a Tamron 28-300mm.......no image quality complaints other than the f3.5.
Ken's lens reviews are somewhat out of date IMO, so I've also been referencing B&H's customer reviews, Digital Photography Review, Digital Camera Review.
FWIW - I'm down to these two lenses:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc..._f_2_8_IS.html
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...0mm_f_2_8.html
Somewhat concerned on the reviews of the VC (vibration control/image stabilization) of this lens as it appears to cause focusing issues resulting in soft images which doesn't appear to be an issue with the non-VR lens.
Just when you think you've found a deal, a serious for me shortcoming pops up.
The Canon lens appears to shine in autofocus performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by intocarss
|
If that wasn't classic Skippah I don't know what is...........