...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:33 AM
JohnnyGMachine's Avatar
JohnnyGMachine JohnnyGMachine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sugar Hill, Ga
Posts: 388
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Holy Crap, I'm a Ford guy and even I was pissed about the Corvette going away!!! Good one!

John
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-30-2006, 05:36 PM
69MyWay's Avatar
69MyWay 69MyWay is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clinton, IL
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Hey guys...This time it isn't a joke.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201707,00.html

NEW YORK — Kirk Kerkorian, the billionaire mogul and major shareholder in General Motors Corp. (GM), said Friday that automakers Renault SA and Nissan Motor Co. are interested in purchasing a significant stake in GM and including the Detroit automaker in their alliance.

Kerkorian's investment company, Tracinda Corp., told GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner in a letter that Renault and Nissan are receptive to the idea of including General Motors in their partnership and purchasing "a significant minority interest" in the automaker.

Click here to visit FOXBusiness.com's Autos Center.

Shares of GM soared $2.45, or 8.9 percent, to close at $29.89 on the New York Stock Exchange.

Tracinda, which owns 9.9 percent of GM's common stock and is GM's third-largest shareholder, said the existing French-Japanese partnership has created "tremendous engineering, manufacturing and marketing synergies, resulting in substantial benefits and cost savings to both Renault and Nissan."

In a separate letter to Nissan Chairman Carlos Ghosn and Renault Chairman Louis Schweitzer, Tracinda said: "Tracinda believes that such a global alliance has the potential to materially strengthen the competitive positions of all three companies in the increasingly challenging worldwide automotive industry."

(Story continues below)

ADVERTISEMENTS
Advertise Here

Tracinda urged GM's board to form a committee to "immediately and fully explore this opportunity together with management," as it feels the alliance could help GM "realize substantial synergies and cost savings and thereby greatly benefit the company and enhance shareholder value."

GM, in a statement, said the Tracinda request "will be taken under advisement" by its board of directors. The automaker said it has not received any offers or proposals from Renault/Nissan about an alliance. GM said it would have no further comment.

A GM official confirmed reports that the GM board met on Friday. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, was not authorized to discuss the meeting.

Nissan said in a statement that Ghosn had been approached by Kerkorian and his top aide Jerome York and other Tracinda officials "to assess the merits of GM joining the Renault Nissan Alliance."

"At this point, it is necessary that GM Board and top management fully support this project in order to start the study of this opportunity after agreement of Renault and Nissan boards," Nissan said.

Nissan said its alliance with Renault was an "open partnership" and "under the right circumstances and with the appropriate partners, the Alliance could be expanded further."

Renault owns a 44.4 percent stake in Nissan, which in turn owns a 15 percent stake in Renault. Nissan was on the brink of bankruptcy when Ghosn was dispatched by Renault to lead the Japanese company in 1999. Brazilian-born Ghosn engineered a cost-cutting and morale-boosting campaign that revived the automaker.

GM has been engaged in an extensive turnaround plan in North America amid declining profit, high labor costs and growing competition from Asian automakers. The automaker announced plans last year to close 12 plants by 2008 and earlier this week announced that 35,000 hourly workers had agreed to retire early or accept a buyout offer.

Kerkorian has pressured GM to take aggressive steps to restore profitability and his top adviser, York, was elected to GM's board earlier this year.

"What we're seeing here is the realization of the offshore foreign OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) and the domestic OEMs sensing that while competition is healthy globally, global alliances are also very healthy, too," said James McTevia, a Detroit-area restructuring consultant.

Some analysts said the overtures could represent the first steps in the most significant alliance or merger since Daimler-Benz acquired Chrysler Corp. in 1998.

JP Morgan analyst Himanshu Patel said in a note to investors that it offered the potential for positive developments in purchasing, product development and in the growing China market.

"If GM management were to agree to such a partnership, we would view this as a major potential long-term positive for GM shareholders," Patel wrote.

Auto analyst Robert Barry of Goldman Sachs & Co., however, said he saw "little logic" in an alliance, noting that Renault has recently embarked on its own restructuring plan and Nissan has made strides on its own in North America, seizing market share from the domestic Big Three.

"We do not see the upside for Nissan from collaborating with struggling GM, certainly not in a manner that would require taking a GM stake," Barry wrote.

Gerald Meyers, former chairman of American Motors Corp. who now teaches at the University of Michigan, said the potential equity interest was "an opening shot, a feeler" but a long way off from a merger along the lines of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler.

Meyers, whose former company had an unsuccessful merger with Renault in 1979, said the inquiry was "a worrisome thing for the GM management. I'm sure they don't need another voice in the boardroom."

"Carlos Ghosn has a reputation of being a very strong CEO," Meyers said. "I can't imagine him taking a back seat to Rick Wagoner."

DaimlerChrysler Chairman Dieter Zetsche, during a morning news conference on incentives and an advertising campaign, called the Tracinda letter speculation and said that sometimes, such news doesn't lead to a result.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-06-2006, 03:08 PM
fvike's Avatar
fvike fvike is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mosjoen, Norway
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think GM would profit from a partnership with Renault particulary. Renault is at the very top in car crash safty (they got most Euro-NCAP 5 star rated cars), which is a huge selling point when it comes to passenger cars. GM however doesn't have "any" passenger cars anybody wants to buy. Renault could help GM develop safe passenger cars, which is the financial backbone of an OEM. They won't survive selling SUVs and Corvettes.

From a preformance standpoint, Renault is the current Formula 1 champion, and they have been involved with F1 for a long time. Renault doesn't have any sports cars / preformance cars in their model lineup. GM could very well take on the preformance oriented side of the partnership, and make use of that F1 tech/experiense.
What Nissan can contribute with I don't know, beacuse all they got is S H I T. Except for the Skyline and 350Z, I'll give them that.
__________________
1969 Ford Mustang - Build progress - My FQuick site
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-06-2006, 08:56 PM
Damn True's Avatar
Damn True Damn True is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

One thing Renault does have is a kick-a$$ line of really nice, fuel efficient turbo-diesel engine cars. I rented a Renault Megane` wagon while in Italy for my honeymoon earlier this year. About the same size as a Subaru Outback, it had more than enough power to run in the left lane on the autostrada, it accelerated well, got great mileage was quiet and the entire car was comfortable and just really darn nice. Id love to have a similar car.

If GM formed a partnership with Renault similar to that of Chrysler and Daimler Benz I'd think we'd see some really nice "regular" cars out of the deal.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-08-2006, 12:11 AM
Roadrage David Roadrage David is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 111
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

being from europe i can say that renault is not mercedes!!! its no where near merc when it comes to quality disighn ecetera not to mention engine tech. every car they built with the ecseption of 1 are all underpowerd and not one single car they build is made for the higher sigmend .i cant see what this company,s culture can bring to help/upgrade GM , compeard to what merc did for mopar/crijsler its a miss match if you ask me , audi volkswagen would be a better marrige .ps they dont have the muscle......... forgive my spelling
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-10-2006, 06:30 AM
trapin's Avatar
trapin trapin is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Michigan
Posts: 692
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Whatever.

This is not going to happen.
__________________
Tony Rapin
The Pigeon Forge Project
A 1968 Pro-Touring LS1 Camaro.........and why not?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-10-2006, 01:57 PM
fasstasheck fasstasheck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

man... time to change my drawers... cus I just crapped my pants... in a bad way
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net