Ultimate Headers

[ADiCarlo]

Originally Posted by camcojb

Sure looks like you end up with a lot of room!

Are those the standard position mounts or the set back ones?

[Musclerodz]

Originally Posted by ADiCarlo

Are those the standard position mounts or the set back ones?

he has the setback mounts

[Jr]

These shorty/mid-length headers can handle the abuse marks put threw them, makes me wonder why everyone NEEDS long tube headers?

That is a great looking header, too.

Dutchboys did an outstanding job on the paint.

[Carbo]

Going to revive an old thread here but I'm looking at these headers as well. One question I have, does anyone know if these will work with mechanical clutch linkage in a 69 camaro with an LS or do I need to go to a hydraulic set up?

[Schwartz Perf]

Originally Posted by Carbo

Going to revive an old thread here but I'm looking at these headers as well. One question I have, does anyone know if these will work with mechanical clutch linkage in a 69 camaro with an LS or do I need to go to a hydraulic set up?

My guess is that they will not work with the mechanical linkage based on the collector's position.

BTW- I have test fit these to see if they work on our chassis, and while they do not, the quality of them is really nice. We use their flanges on every header we build now, they're really sexy.

-Dale

[LS3torque]

On a car that has enough room for long tubes why wouldn't you run long tubes? I know the LS1 2 and 3s have good torque out of the box but why leave torque on the table?

Tom

[Schwartz Perf]

Originally Posted by LS3torque

On a car that has enough room for long tubes why wouldn't you run long tubes? I know the LS1 2 and 3s have good torque out of the box but why leave torque on the table?

Tom

They published some dyno results, interesting numbers on the LS7:

http://www.ultimateheaders.com/dyno.shtml