...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:34 AM
dhutton dhutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 1,186
Thanked 542 Times in 296 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vstol View Post
thanks I knew about the 37 degree flare I was wondering if there is another solution besides flaring. I would imagine it would not be as secure
They are secure. That type of fitting is widely used in other applications. I have used them several times without issue.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:42 AM
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi's Avatar
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi OBeer-WAN-Kenobi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
They are secure. That type of fitting is widely used in other applications. I have used them several times without issue.

Don
Aren't those just for aluminum tubing though? It doesn't say anything about stainless tubing in the descriptions, just aluminum tubing. I would think that would make a major difference.

That's what steered me towards the yorlok and swagelok style fittings like I linked above before I ultimately just went with PTFE lined braided hose. I know for a fact the yorlok and swagelok fittings hold tight on stainless as we use them with stainless tubing in high pressure tester applications where I work.
__________________
'69 RS Camaro
'99 SWB Silverado LS "Beater"
'01 GMC Sierra 2500HD LQ4 (Turbo build)
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4X4


My '69 Camaro Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-15-2014, 12:16 PM
dhutton dhutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 1,186
Thanked 542 Times in 296 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi View Post
Aren't those just for aluminum tubing though? It doesn't say anything about stainless tubing in the descriptions, just aluminum tubing. I would think that would make a major difference.

That's what steered me towards the yorlok and swagelok style fittings like I linked above before I ultimately just went with PTFE lined braided hose. I know for a fact the yorlok and swagelok fittings hold tight on stainless as we use them with stainless tubing in high pressure tester applications where I work.
I have used them on 3/8 stainless and I can tell you from experience that the ferrule is on there to stay. At least they hold a whole lot better than those Russell AN to GM fuel rail adaptors...

As I said not the most elegant solution but flaring 1/2 inch stainless is something that I can't image being all that easy to do depending on the flaring tool you have.

Your fittings were $30 each if I read it correctly. That gives me a little heartburn...

Don

Last edited by dhutton; 08-15-2014 at 12:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-15-2014, 12:41 PM
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi's Avatar
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi OBeer-WAN-Kenobi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi View Post
I think something like this would also work:

http://www.mcmaster.com/#5182k457/=taj967

I was going to use them since you don't need to flare anything but decided just to use PTFE lined braided hose instead of hard line.

These are rated for 2,100 PSI so they should be pretty secure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
I have used them on 3/8 stainless and I can tell you from experience that the ferrule is on there to stay. At least they hold a whole lot better than those Russell AN to GM fuel rail adaptors...

As I said not the most elegant solution but flaring 1/2 inch stainless is something that I can't image being all that easy to do depending on the flaring tool you have.

Your fittings were $30 each if I read it correctly. That gives me a little heartburn...

Don
Yeah, those yorlok/swagelok fittings are expensive but they make some for up to 10,000 psi applications. We use them on a "boom" tester. A tester used to test valves beyond their rating for safety factors. Sometimes up to 10,000 psi, and they don't leak. The one I linked was only for 2100 psi though. "Only" haha. Probably overkill, but really you only probably need two of them.

The horse shoe style Russel to GM fuel connections are fine I think. It's the snap lock ones that are an accident waiting to happen.

http://www.russellperformance.com/mc...injected.shtml

The first ones in the above link (push on) are the junk. The second ones (threaded cap) are OK.

I agree about the flaring in my experience anyway. You have to buy an expensive flaring tool to make things come out right. The cheap tools like the one I have suck. I can't make a flare seal for my life with mine.

P.S. I know what you mean about the heartburn. I junkyard dive or find the cheapest stuff that will work whenever I can. Fuel stuff though, I ponied up the cash for what I needed. I'm pretty sure my plumbing cost more than my tanks inc fuel tank.
__________________
'69 RS Camaro
'99 SWB Silverado LS "Beater"
'01 GMC Sierra 2500HD LQ4 (Turbo build)
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4X4


My '69 Camaro Build Thread

Last edited by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi; 08-15-2014 at 12:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2014, 11:37 AM
vstol vstol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Thanks for the input, if I flared it I would take it to a machine shop to do so, hardly worth the $$to get a flare tool to flare two ends.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2014, 04:05 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi View Post
Yeah, those yorlok/swagelok fittings are expensive but they make some for up to 10,000 psi applications. We use them on a "boom" tester. A tester used to test valves beyond their rating for safety factors. Sometimes up to 10,000 psi, and they don't leak. The one I linked was only for 2100 psi though. "Only" haha. Probably overkill, but really you only probably need two of them.

The horse shoe style Russel to GM fuel connections are fine I think. It's the snap lock ones that are an accident waiting to happen.

http://www.russellperformance.com/mc...injected.shtml

The first ones in the above link (push on) are the junk. The second ones (threaded cap) are OK.

I agree about the flaring in my experience anyway. You have to buy an expensive flaring tool to make things come out right. The cheap tools like the one I have suck. I can't make a flare seal for my life with mine.

P.S. I know what you mean about the heartburn. I junkyard dive or find the cheapest stuff that will work whenever I can. Fuel stuff though, I ponied up the cash for what I needed. I'm pretty sure my plumbing cost more than my tanks inc fuel tank.


You're in need of some "FLARE SAVERS" --- copper "gaskets" that go between the male and female and they're softer so mate better.

Yes -- the "proper" 37* flaring tools are expense... I think the tapered roller bearing version I have was like $450... The flare savers are FAR less....LOL

http://www.gen-aircraft-hardware.com...agename=flrsav
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-29-2015, 09:40 AM
vstol vstol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default

How about a -8AN fitting to 1/2"-20 which is on the end of SS fuel line?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:53 AM
Vince@Meanstreets's Avatar
Vince@Meanstreets Vince@Meanstreets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 5,532
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
They are secure. That type of fitting is widely used in other applications. I have used them several times without issue.

Don
They are designed for aluminum tubing but I have used them on transmission lines (90 psi dead head pressures) and mechanical fuel pump applications with steel line with no issues. Whether it works with the harder stainless line is what is not known. 70 psi fuel pressure you gonna wanna flare the tube.

Any particular reason you are wanting stainless? 1/2" stainless isn't a whole lot of fun to work with.
__________________
MEANSTREETS PERFORMANCE

Dealer for
ACCUAIR rideheight control systems
ENTROPY RADIATORS XXX radiators for your pro-touring vehicle
FORGELINE MOTORSPORTS Highline custom 3 piece wheels
WEGNER AUTOMOTIVE Custom engines and LSX drive systems
SPEEDTECH PERFORMANCE Bay Area stocking dealer

NEVER FORGET -11
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-15-2014, 11:53 AM
Musclerodz's Avatar
Musclerodz Musclerodz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: washington, ok
Posts: 4,286
Thanks: 22
Thanked 164 Times in 95 Posts
Default

That is a compression style fitting. I am sure they work fine, but not what I prefer to use.
__________________
Mike Redpath
Musclerodz & Customz
facebook page
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net