...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Race Cars and Modern Pro-Street
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2014, 05:44 PM
358Mustang 358Mustang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 73
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
I am at 18x12 front w/ 7.5 BS and 18x13 rear w/ 8.5 BS.

Front TREAD width outside of tire to outside of tire is 75 or 75.5 if I recall.



Um... did you mean Infineon is for corporate weenies?

Now, let's see that hat!
Ok nice. Pretty deep BS, I was doing some rough numbers with the spindle/hub setup I was trying to use and I was coming up with about 9" BS if I wanted to target 0 scrub... That seemed pretty high, I am looking into other spindle/hub options currently. I don't think what I have is going to work out too well... Too much SAI and the hub offset is pretty big.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2014, 07:33 PM
chetly chetly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 181
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Maier has some aluminum spindles with steel shaft that uses big bearings. They might work for you...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2014, 10:06 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 358Mustang View Post
Ok nice. Pretty deep BS, I was doing some rough numbers with the spindle/hub setup I was trying to use and I was coming up with about 9" BS if I wanted to target 0 scrub... That seemed pretty high, I am looking into other spindle/hub options currently. I don't think what I have is going to work out too well... Too much SAI and the hub offset is pretty big.
Payton King has the same size wheels and long arm deal but a .25 inch more BS so he closer to zero scrub than I am but neither of us are at true zero. Still pretty low and wide though.
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2014, 11:36 PM
358Mustang 358Mustang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 73
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
Payton King has the same size wheels and long arm deal but a .25 inch more BS so he closer to zero scrub than I am but neither of us are at true zero. Still pretty low and wide though.
I gotcha. Not sure how important it is, or if having an inch or so of scrub isn't particularly a bad thing then maybe I shouldn't sweat it. I just would rather try and do the figuring out now and optimize what I can (or at least what I think is right) rather than just compromise and call it good enough
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2014, 10:34 PM
358Mustang 358Mustang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 73
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

SO now I am working on just making my own spindles. This seems like the best route for me, since I can dial in exactly what I want. I found some photos of some of the Trans am spindles, I plan on using a similar design. Mono ball upper/lower joints. Ive got speedway engineering 5x5 grand national hubs and coleman sells a weld on spindle pin that I am going to start building off..

Here is the spindle I was going to steal some ideas from and build it similar to this guy.





Id like to end up in the 6 degree KPI range and zero (or less than an inch) of scrub with an 18x11.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2014, 05:39 PM
358Mustang 358Mustang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 73
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Made a little progress. Made a motor plate and got that tacked in. I needed to set the motor where I wanted it, next I plan on building the "sub frame" for the lower control arms. I think I am getting things figured out. I know I am 7" back from where my old motor was. And I had my old motor 2-3 inches back. So I'll call it 10" set back. Unsure on the height but the engine is very low in the chassis. I think I should be ok with pan clearance, but I have already explored some options of making a pan about 1-1.5" shorter if I need.




I'll have front and rear plates, as well as a tranny mount..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2014, 05:44 PM
dstryr dstryr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gilroy CA
Posts: 130
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You made the engine plate? LOL
__________________
Dennis

www.creationsultd.com

1969 Chevelle Build - Meanstreets Performance Style
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=39456
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2014, 05:48 PM
358Mustang 358Mustang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 73
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

If you closely interpret my posts. I said... "made a motor plate" .That could mean I made it, some kid in china made it, or in this case you cut it for me. And did the high quality programming
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net