...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-03-2014, 02:17 PM
Brewtal66 Brewtal66 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Moreno valley, CA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

I ran over to his house this morning and snapped a few pictures of this Elky. You can see all the junk on top of it, so I wasn't able to get a good picture. And the lighting was horrible, so excuse these really bad pictures.



Under the back:








__________________
Tim King
Editor, Lateral-G
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-03-2014, 03:16 PM
Vince@Meanstreets's Avatar
Vince@Meanstreets Vince@Meanstreets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 5,532
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

ZZ top baby!!!!!!!!

Not too bad, trans tunnel done, cage looks good, back halved, clearanced for big tires , your more than half way there.

700hp LS and a Mag T56 and ford 9 in the rear will be the way to go. You should be able to use the rear lower link mounts.
__________________
MEANSTREETS PERFORMANCE

Dealer for
ACCUAIR rideheight control systems
ENTROPY RADIATORS XXX radiators for your pro-touring vehicle
FORGELINE MOTORSPORTS Highline custom 3 piece wheels
WEGNER AUTOMOTIVE Custom engines and LSX drive systems
SPEEDTECH PERFORMANCE Bay Area stocking dealer

NEVER FORGET -11
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-03-2014, 04:36 PM
Brewtal66 Brewtal66 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Moreno valley, CA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab View Post
ZZ top baby!!!!!!!!

Not too bad, trans tunnel done, cage looks good, back halved, clearanced for big tires , your more than half way there.

700hp LS and a Mag T56 and ford 9 in the rear will be the way to go. You should be able to use the rear lower link mounts.
Looking at the pictures...would I be able to use that rearend? Just thinking the rear rims would have a ton of offset on them.

The cage actually continues all the way into the engine bay too....so the chassis has to be stiff as hell already.
__________________
Tim King
Editor, Lateral-G
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-03-2014, 05:08 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Pick ups and "Elkys" do NOT make good track cars.... Check out any of the times on USCA -- or Good-Guys and you'll see the trucks just aren't competitive, despite having some pretty good drivers. They just don't hook up.

I used to have a 69 El Camino SS with a 396... was the worst driving car ever. All it ever did was light up the tires.

If you want to build a track car - at least start out with something that isn't burdened right out of the box. This stuff is hard enough and costs enough as it is without trying to turn something that doesn't work into something that is now just expensive and doesn't work.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-03-2014, 06:37 PM
Brewtal66 Brewtal66 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Moreno valley, CA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Pick ups and "Elkys" do NOT make good track cars.... Check out any of the times on USCA -- or Good-Guys and you'll see the trucks just aren't competitive, despite having some pretty good drivers. They just don't hook up.

I used to have a 69 El Camino SS with a 396... was the worst driving car ever. All it ever did was light up the tires.

If you want to build a track car - at least start out with something that isn't burdened right out of the box. This stuff is hard enough and costs enough as it is without trying to turn something that doesn't work into something that is now just expensive and doesn't work.
Even if I move the engine and trans back and get this to an almost 50/50 weight distribution?
__________________
Tim King
Editor, Lateral-G
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-03-2014, 06:53 PM
Vince@Meanstreets's Avatar
Vince@Meanstreets Vince@Meanstreets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 5,532
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewtal66 View Post
Even if I move the engine and trans back and get this to an almost 50/50 weight distribution?
yep, super light is not always a good thing but it all can be tuned. Beauty of starting with a light car and link suspension. You can add and move weight around and tune AS for traction.

Your gonna want some rear weight biased. 45 front/ 55 rear.

Most of those cars Greg speaks of are still tri 4 bar rears with not a lot of tire. With a clean sheet suspension a lot of improments can be made. Long arm 3 link, cantillever coil overs and watts comes to mind.

Let the rear end go if he wants it. Your probably better off starting fresh. Theres a bunch to change on the current rear end housing.
__________________
MEANSTREETS PERFORMANCE

Dealer for
ACCUAIR rideheight control systems
ENTROPY RADIATORS XXX radiators for your pro-touring vehicle
FORGELINE MOTORSPORTS Highline custom 3 piece wheels
WEGNER AUTOMOTIVE Custom engines and LSX drive systems
SPEEDTECH PERFORMANCE Bay Area stocking dealer

NEVER FORGET -11

Last edited by Vince@Meanstreets; 12-03-2014 at 06:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-03-2014, 08:23 PM
Brewtal66 Brewtal66 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Moreno valley, CA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab View Post
yep, super light is not always a good thing but it all can be tuned. Beauty of starting with a light car and link suspension. You can add and move weight around and tune AS for traction.

Your gonna want some rear weight biased. 45 front/ 55 rear.

Most of those cars Greg speaks of are still tri 4 bar rears with not a lot of tire. With a clean sheet suspension a lot of improments can be made. Long arm 3 link, cantillever coil overs and watts comes to mind.

Let the rear end go if he wants it. Your probably better off starting fresh. Theres a bunch to change on the current rear end housing.
I know some weight will get added back into the car. For starters, I'd put in a glass front windshield. I'd also put the guts back in the door to have working windows. A bigger fuel cell would add a little weight.

What's your thought on a rear mounted radiator?
__________________
Tim King
Editor, Lateral-G
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-03-2014, 08:33 PM
Vince@Meanstreets's Avatar
Vince@Meanstreets Vince@Meanstreets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 5,532
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Not necessary. The cooling system will be lighter where it belongs. If you are worried about upfront weight your better off with and aluminum rad support and composite bumpers.
__________________
MEANSTREETS PERFORMANCE

Dealer for
ACCUAIR rideheight control systems
ENTROPY RADIATORS XXX radiators for your pro-touring vehicle
FORGELINE MOTORSPORTS Highline custom 3 piece wheels
WEGNER AUTOMOTIVE Custom engines and LSX drive systems
SPEEDTECH PERFORMANCE Bay Area stocking dealer

NEVER FORGET -11
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-03-2014, 09:03 PM
Brewtal66 Brewtal66 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Moreno valley, CA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

I'm pretty sure he already has a glass front bumper for it. I'd also add some carpeting and a basic stereo, and some heat/AC.

Sounds like it will be a fun car. Next step is to get it registered in my name. Hasn't been registered since the 80s.
__________________
Tim King
Editor, Lateral-G
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-04-2014, 08:10 AM
BMR Sales's Avatar
BMR Sales BMR Sales is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,327
Thanks: 475
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Pick ups and "Elkys" do NOT make good track cars.... Check out any of the times on USCA -- or Good-Guys and you'll see the trucks just aren't competitive, despite having some pretty good drivers. They just don't hook up.

I used to have a 69 El Camino SS with a 396... was the worst driving car ever. All it ever did was light up the tires.
Bad Driving Car, but still a lot of Smiles per Mile!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net