...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2015, 04:26 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Scared me for a minute there Sieg...
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2015, 10:26 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 101 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
Scared me for a minute there Sieg...
The offer was made to use Norwood as the recipient.......but I haven't seen an engine cover that looks better to me than my Gen 1 SBC motor and everyone knows I don't have the talent to handle any more horsepower.

I did find him a really nice C10 shortwide today that would be a good donor/shop truck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2015, 06:17 PM
PTAddict PTAddict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 292
Thanks: 12
Thanked 25 Times in 14 Posts
Default

All an LS3 needs to make that kind of crank HP is a cam (and a mild cam at that). I had an LS3 in my previous car (71 Camaro), completely stock internally other than a 227/235 113 LSA Comp LSr cam. Headers too, of course. It made ~465 HP and 430 TQ at the rear wheels. It survived about 20 track days without a hiccup. It idled and drove almost like a stock late model Vette.
__________________
Latest car: https://lateral-g.net/members/borduin/
EFI Tuner for: http://www.modernclassicsauto.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2015, 11:27 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 101 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTAddict View Post
All an LS3 needs to make that kind of crank HP is a cam (and a mild cam at that). I had an LS3 in my previous car (71 Camaro), completely stock internally other than a 227/235 113 LSA Comp LSr cam. Headers too, of course. It made ~465 HP and 430 TQ at the rear wheels. It survived about 20 track days without a hiccup. It idled and drove almost like a stock late model Vette.
So 550 - 575 at the crank is a reasonably safe target?

What are the LS3's common stress related failures?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-21-2015, 05:11 AM
71RS/SS396's Avatar
71RS/SS396 71RS/SS396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wake Forest,NC
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I would use the LS3 525 cam and springs, GM did tons of testing on that combo, it makes good power and is easy on the valvetrain. The question is... how good does the car handle that it's going in? The higher the grip level is the more time you need to spend on helping it keep oil where it belongs. A oilpan with good baffling (I'm a fan of the Autokraft pan), accusump, oil cooler, and good venting on the valve covers and valley through a catch can.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-21-2015, 07:14 AM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 101 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71RS/SS396 View Post
I would use the LS3 525 cam and springs, GM did tons of testing on that combo, it makes good power and is easy on the valvetrain. The question is... how good does the car handle that it's going in? The higher the grip level is the more time you need to spend on helping it keep oil where it belongs. A oil pan with good baffling (I'm a fan of the Autokraft pan), accusump, oil cooler, and good venting on the valve covers and valley through a catch can.
Thanks Tim. Completely agree with the handling statement and will add brakes to that. With the new generation crate powerplants it's an uncomforting thought wondering what type of chassis' they may be going in.....and the fact that they could be coming at you on public roads in a manner similar to a Skud missile.

One the the better tracks near us (6 hours) is Thunderhill and T2 is an oil starver for sure. It's a pure 180*3rd gear radius that's probably damaged more than it's share of motors.

The GMPP LS3 525 motor is what I've been looking at as a decent target for the shop to improve on by addressing the oiling and venting issues along with insuring the motor gets adequate fuel, that should deliver a reliable cost effective package in my amature mind at least.

At what point does the Nodular Iron crankshaft/rods/pistons become a weak link in an LS?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-21-2015, 08:12 AM
PTAddict PTAddict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 292
Thanks: 12
Thanked 25 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sieg View Post
At what point does the Nodular Iron crankshaft/rods/pistons become a weak link in an LS?
The bottom end parts in an LS3 are far more robust than in the production Gen 1 small blocks. I simply wouldn't worry about the bottom end at any normally aspirated power level. The failures I've seen on LS motors at the track almost all seem to be related to either oiling issues or valvetrain.

You do want to make sure you're using an ECU with correctly calibrated knock sensors (like the GM ECU, or a correctly calibrated Holley or AEM). LS3s are quite knock sensitive, especially on the crap gas we get here in Oregon. I dyno tuned a 2011 Camaro SS yesterday with stock cam, headers, cold air, and I couldn't get it to keep more than 19 degrees timing at WOT. And it still made 413 hp at the rear wheels!

Also if you're going to track it, overdo the cooling system as much as possible, especially in a 1st gen f-body, which has smaller core size than the 2nd gens. Ron Davis or C&R radiator, secondary oil cooler, tightly seal the high pressure area at the cowl. Also a 160 thermostat if you don't care much about the heater
__________________
Latest car: https://lateral-g.net/members/borduin/
EFI Tuner for: http://www.modernclassicsauto.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-21-2015, 08:35 AM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 18
Thanked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71RS/SS396 View Post
and good venting on the valve covers and valley through a catch can.
Tim,

Do you have a preferred catch can that you suggest/use? There are so many different styles, and as such, a lot of marketing hype for each...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-22-2015, 07:01 AM
Jay Hilliard's Avatar
Jay Hilliard Jay Hilliard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,119
Thanks: 34
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Bryan,

Petersen and DSE cans seem to be the ones used a lot.
__________________
Jay
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-29-2015, 07:30 PM
Solid LT1 Solid LT1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sieg View Post
So 550 - 575 at the crank is a reasonably safe target?

What are the LS3's common stress related failures?
Throw the connecting rods away, forged pistons, some valve train components and mods to oiling system passages. I haven't built a lot of LS motors but, my friends machine shop has, including his sons kick ass KOH off road buggy engine. If your going drag racing, it's one thing but, if you plan on hitting a road course for 20 minute lapping sessions and extended high RPM running, cooling systems upgrades would come into play in my book.

When building my GS Vette LS3 I went with Mahle pistons, Manley forged rods (lighter than the GM powder metal crap rods) hand ported the heads, changed valves for hollow stem stainless stuff (but the OEM LS3 intakes are pretty nice and light) I drilled the plastic lifter guides for better oil drain back, used better lifters, pushrods, valve springs, and most importantly looked at all the poorly intersecting holes in the oil passages of the block/oil pan and ported/smoothed the transitions as I anticipate extended high RPM operation of my build. You won't find the deficiencies of the LS oiling system in a drag racing environment but, take that same modified motor to a track and you will. After all I went through on the LS build, I think I should have just called up Donvon Engineering and ordered an aluminum GEN1 block. In my opinion the oiling system of an LS motor isn't as good of a set up as a GEN1.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net