...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Cooling: Radiators/Fans/Controllers
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2015, 04:49 PM
andrewb70's Avatar
andrewb70 andrewb70 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 930
Thanks: 255
Thanked 650 Times in 261 Posts
Default

So........

I am not ashamed to admit that I might be slightly obsessed with the ability to control my fan speed.

Recently I had to add coolant to my system (I was running straight water in the summer) so that I don't hurt anything during the long WI winter. After adding the coolant (good to about -40 degrees) I noticed that the engine ran about 4-5 degrees hotter under previously noted conditions. This of course caused the fan to run faster per the table that I programmed.

So I decided to "retune" the table and just set it to work the best it can in my car. For me, "the best it can" is running the fan as slowly as possible, while maintaining a target temperature. But what is that target temperature? LOL

I know I have a stock thermostat which by all accounts is 187 degrees. Given that information I can turn off the fan and just watch what the temperature does under varying conditions (granted all of this is dependent on ambient temperature and ideal I would incorporate it into the fan control strategy for optimal results, but even GM doesn't do this...Didn't I say that I might be slightly obsessed?)

Driving normally around town (aka like grandma...top speed 35) the temperature never got above 191-192 (about 50 ambient). I then took it on the highway and cruising at a steady 75 mph the temp was stable between 194-195 degrees (all this with the fan off).

So I configured my table as follows at vehicle speed below 40mph...

Temp:fan %

194:5 (off)
200:10
210:20

Then it ramps in rather quickly (I don't recall the exact numbers). The fan basically never kicks on around town and temps is steady at 191-192.

For vehicle speed above 40mph I just configured the cells to be one value off, like this:

194:5
200:5
210:10

etc....again, ramping in quickly. Temp is steady at 194-195 without the fan.

I don't know if this is optimal in terms of thermal efficiency. Probably not because my engine seems to run cooler than it would in the donor vehicle (2009 Colorado pick-up). But in terms of my target goal (cycling the fan as little as possible) I think I succeeded.

Anyway, I thought I would share for anyone that cares.

Comments, questions, and opinions welcome.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2015, 09:13 PM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Andrew,

Question: when driving down the road normally, won't the fan spin due to airflow through the radiator? I'm curious how much more the motors spin the fans at 5% vs. what air passing through it would be?

That would take some math to figure out I assume, but I am curious.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2015, 10:05 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carbuff View Post
Andrew,

Question: when driving down the road normally, won't the fan spin due to airflow through the radiator? I'm curious how much more the motors spin the fans at 5% vs. what air passing through it would be?

That would take some math to figure out I assume, but I am curious.


Running down the road - the fan shouldn't be needed at all.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-17-2015, 10:18 PM
andrewb70's Avatar
andrewb70 andrewb70 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 930
Thanks: 255
Thanked 650 Times in 261 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Running down the road - the fan shouldn't be needed at all.
Precisely. See my comment above.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:13 AM
130fe 130fe is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 779
Thanks: 225
Thanked 40 Times in 29 Posts
Post

Justin, do you have a link to the kit you listed?
__________________
Chris
1968 Camaro SS
LS3/T56
Full of DSE and Holley parts
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2015, 10:35 AM
4wheels 4wheels is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Vehicle speed

With some of the newer high output fans the vehicle speed based fan disable strategy isn't used anymore. If the cooling is enough that the fans aren't needed then they turn off due to temperature anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Running down the road - the fan shouldn't be needed at all.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2015, 10:42 AM
4wheels 4wheels is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Stand alone PWM fan control - temperature output signal?

I am doing some testing of a stand alone PWM fan controller for a manufacturer. Since this is a stand alone system it reads a separate coolant temperature sensor and can be used on any vehicle (doesn't have to have PWM fan control strategy in the ECM).

One question that has come up in my testing is what is this other sensor reading for temperature since it isn't the same as the other temperature sensors in the cooling system (not the same sensor and may or may not be in the same location in comparison to engine, pump, thermostat, radiator etc.).

If you were a potential customer for this type of product, would an output of temperature from a fan controller be of interest? For example I would like to see it output temperature as a 0-5 volt signal that I could read with a data acquisition system or even just a simple volt meter. Might even be able to drive a gauge with this output (depends on the gauge type).

Any feedback/ideas?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2015, 05:48 PM
andrewb70's Avatar
andrewb70 andrewb70 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 930
Thanks: 255
Thanked 650 Times in 261 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4wheels View Post
I am doing some testing of a stand alone PWM fan controller for a manufacturer. Since this is a stand alone system it reads a separate coolant temperature sensor and can be used on any vehicle (doesn't have to have PWM fan control strategy in the ECM).

One question that has come up in my testing is what is this other sensor reading for temperature since it isn't the same as the other temperature sensors in the cooling system (not the same sensor and may or may not be in the same location in comparison to engine, pump, thermostat, radiator etc.).

If you were a potential customer for this type of product, would an output of temperature from a fan controller be of interest? For example I would like to see it output temperature as a 0-5 volt signal that I could read with a data acquisition system or even just a simple volt meter. Might even be able to drive a gauge with this output (depends on the gauge type).

Any feedback/ideas?

Thanks.
If you are targeting users that may not have EFI, then I see a benefit to having a "temp out." As you said, this can be used to drive a gauge in the dash. I think most temp gauges use a thermister style sensor so the output would need to be resistance.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2015, 06:54 AM
mikels mikels is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 145
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Running down the road - the fan shouldn't be needed at all.
Not completely true - if running the fan creates more negative pressure on backside of cooling system stack, running fan will increase cooling.

For example - when Mark switched Red Devil to 850W fan from 400W, it resulted in ~10 F reduction in coolant and oil temps (oil-to-water oil cooler in radiator) when running on track - with average speeds well above what you typically run on street.

Keep in mind this is a very thick (~5-6") cooling stack as well (A/C condenser, ICHE, radiator)

So ability to create more negative pressure on backside of cooling stack resulted in more airflow across coolers - and more heat transfer as a result.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2015, 08:19 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikels View Post
Not completely true - if running the fan creates more negative pressure on backside of cooling system stack, running fan will increase cooling.

For example - when Mark switched Red Devil to 850W fan from 400W, it resulted in ~10 F reduction in coolant and oil temps (oil-to-water oil cooler in radiator) when running on track - with average speeds well above what you typically run on street.

Keep in mind this is a very thick (~5-6") cooling stack as well (A/C condenser, ICHE, radiator)

So ability to create more negative pressure on backside of cooling stack resulted in more airflow across coolers - and more heat transfer as a result.

Dave


Good info Dave.... and Yes - I can certainly see in a racing situation, and with that much horsepower creating additional heat that needs to be dispersed. I was referring to a normal freeway cruising situation where even my Semi truck rarely engages the fan (air engaged fan of ginormous proportions).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net