...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2017, 01:18 PM
rustomatic rustomatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: ATL
Posts: 748
Thanks: 11
Thanked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Default

They did say that the tune was "conservative." Surely they do not want to grenade the thing during the first round of glory tests . . .

Yes, I just called you Shirley.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2017, 01:43 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rustomatic View Post
They did say that the tune was "conservative." Surely they do not want to grenade the thing during the first round of glory tests . . .

Yes, I just called you Shirley.



Think about HellFire - makes 950HP - drives across country multiple times per year - gets tracked - and generally gets the crap driven out of it..... and I hear the new build will be 1000+....... So my point was more that there is an awful lot going on here for the result.... when 1000HP these days is pretty "easy".... and on PUMP gas not E85.

I love the car and the build -- please don't misread what I'm saying. The car is bad ass 100%. I just was expecting 1750 +
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2017, 02:20 PM
preston preston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 657
Thanks: 0
Thanked 38 Times in 20 Posts
Default

I don't think you are gaining any efficiency by compound boosting it in this application, so the extra complexity is more for show than go - What I mean is I think they would have put up the same number with only turbos and the same boost. Heck, maybe more. Generally the compound boosting is to allow the positive displacement charger to fill in the bottom end before the turbos are full flow.

I think I had a similar reaction to you, but more because the chart showed they were using 27 psi to make the power. That's a crap load of boost, my rough numbers show that the base motor is making less than 400whp without boost. But again that could be the tune and lots of other things.

But agreed, this is a totally cool car nothing negative to say about it except I think the compound deal is more for show, it would probably be lighter and make just as much power with turbos only.

Always curious how the CF brakes will work in the real world without ABS (or did I miss that part ?). According to Clill himself that can be a dicey proposition.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2017, 02:28 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by preston View Post
I don't think you are gaining any efficiency by compound boosting it in this application, so the extra complexity is more for show than go - What I mean is I think they would have put up the same number with only turbos and the same boost. Heck, maybe more. Generally the compound boosting is to allow the positive displacement charger to fill in the bottom end before the turbos are full flow.

I think I had a similar reaction to you, but more because the chart showed they were using 27 psi to make the power. That's a crap load of boost, my rough numbers show that the base motor is making less than 400whp without boost. But again that could be the tune and lots of other things.

But agreed, this is a totally cool car nothing negative to say about it except I think the compound deal is more for show, it would probably be lighter and make just as much power with turbos only.

Always curious how the CF brakes will work in the real world without ABS (or did I miss that part ?). According to Clill himself that can be a dicey proposition.



I was playing yesterday with the LSX platform ---- Hot Rod magazine built a STOCK LSX 376 -- put on a single 76MM turbo and made 1000 HP.... on pump gas with 19 psi.


Mind you -- that's flywheel....


http://www.hotrod.com/articles/make-...ecision-turbo/


I agree --- super killer build -- love the looks and the color choices and the carbon and all of it.

The carbon brakes on our 911 S Turbo's are better than fantastic!! And according to Mark Steilow -- We might wear out a set of rotors about 30 sets of brake pads from now. Amazing!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2017, 03:59 PM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 291
Thanks: 158
Thanked 108 Times in 65 Posts
Default

Who else out there remembers when 450hp was usually considered barely streetable?
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2017, 04:06 PM
Che70velle's Avatar
Che70velle Che70velle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 2,251
Thanks: 648
Thanked 179 Times in 121 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
Who else out there remembers when 450hp was usually considered barely streetable?
No kidding! My 02' Z06 had 405 flywheel hp, and I thought that I had me a monster...LOL!!
__________________
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------
70 velle' on custom chassis w/custom RideTech coilovers, RED sleeved 434” with Mamo 265’s, F-body Magnum, 12 bolt 3:73, wilwood 6/4's, bla, bla, bla...build. thread https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=39631
New 434” engine build here https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ved-block.html

Thanks Dad!!

My Chevelle is old school... It has a belt driven power steering pump.
They're 17's, but I keep em clean!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2017, 07:28 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Che70velle View Post
No kidding! My 02' Z06 had 405 flywheel hp, and I thought that I had me a monster...LOL!!



Where's the like button!


LOL



FACT!


Or you bought a big ass crate motor! A 502!! with 502 hp!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2017, 09:51 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Stunning, but a track car? I find that hard to believe.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-19-2017, 03:32 AM
Sheck44's Avatar
Sheck44 Sheck44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Pickering Ont
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 209
Thanked 1,125 Times in 402 Posts
Default Bad A$$

Seriously awesome car ... 10,000 hours of work, WOW !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvAqEGbkx5E

Steve
__________________
'Build it RIGHT the 2nd time'
69' SS X11 PRO-TOURING - SOLD
73' FJ40 LS - SOLD
1966 FJ40 R2.8 -SOLD
911 Hotrod - SOLD
2002 Gated 360
Next up - "Killer Piggy"
67' Camaro - Take-Over'
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2017, 09:54 AM
Josh@Ridetech's Avatar
Josh@Ridetech Josh@Ridetech is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 382
Thanks: 17
Thanked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
Stunning, but a track car? I find that hard to believe.
It's definitely a nice build. When we worked with the guys, they said they didn't have any intentions of this one being a trailer queen. They plan on tracking the car to no end.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net