...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Brakes
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2018, 07:31 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 1,682
Thanked 901 Times in 670 Posts
Default

Watching the video Donny posted, they reiterate that the working angles need to be the same between the two u-joints while showing the working angles at each end being fairly extreme. Which is more important? I can rotate the nose of the pinion up more easily than bringing the tail shaft of the transmission up. That would get my angles the same between the two joints but the angles would be more extreme. I'd be simply doing this as a test to see if it effects the vibration at all.

I swear I've done this before and it had no effect on the vibration. Then again, I swore my angles were good, too.

Also, if I were to nose the pinion down 3.5 degrees to match the tail shaft, causing the drive line to look like this \ _ /, wouldn't that cause the drive shaft to become unstable or bind?

Thanks everyone.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2001 BMW 540iT soon to be manual swapped and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

00 BMW 540i/6: Suspension, wheels, and ACS bits.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2018, 08:00 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Your current working angles per your measurements are within .5-1 of each other. 0-.5 is ideal so you are close.

What you are describing with the pinion pointed down 3.5 is exactly what I just talked about. You are getting your working angles on both ends of the shafts as small as possible. It takes some trial and error. The problem with this strategy is that you may get an oscillating vibration. When the working angles are equal and opposite, you get a consistent hum or vibration, when they are not you will get a stronger vibration followed by none.

Equal and opposite and small working angles gives you the smoothest operation.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2018, 06:30 AM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 1,682
Thanked 901 Times in 670 Posts
Default

OK, I think I'm getting confused. I'm going to do some more reading and get back with you guys. I think I'm getting my terms mixed up or something.

Based on the measurements I have given, what is my pinion angle?

Thank you
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2001 BMW 540iT soon to be manual swapped and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

00 BMW 540i/6: Suspension, wheels, and ACS bits.

Last edited by WSSix; 01-12-2018 at 06:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2018, 08:56 AM
randy randy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,041
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Do this All angles are measured on the drivers side of the car.

1. engine/trans is on ____ angle and it heads down in the back. Meaning the crankshaft is higher than the tail shaft

2. The Driveshaft (if not there use a string or a piece of wood to go from the center of the output shaft to the center of the pinion) is at a ___ angle and it heads down in the back. The connection at the transmission & driveshaft is higher or lower than the connection at the rear diff to driveshaft. Does water from from the front driveshaft down to the rear or would it run from the rear to the front towards the engine

3. the pinion is at a ______ angle heads up or down in the back. The driveshaft and pinion create a V or a /\ ?. Would water placed on top of the diff run behind it or onto the driveshaft.

Base on this we will figure out the rest.


To give you an idea my angles were close but still caused a vibration and the aluminum bigger driveshaft fixed this. Mainly because the driveshaft was very level and caused a jump rope effect not to mention the driveshaft shop high speed balanced my new one.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2018, 08:56 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

2.5 degrees UP from level.

Your tailshaft is DOWN 3-3.5 from level. If this is true it puts them close to the same plane.

This is exaggerated: Tailshaft: \ Driveshaft: / Rear: \
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2018, 10:10 AM
randy randy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,041
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 43 Posts
Default

i just dont see his driveshaft going up from the trans to the rear diff. My car is Low and i know its a 1st gen but i still have 1 degree down on my driveshaft angle. If his driveshaft is going up my guess is that he is measuring his engine angle wrong. The crank pulley and fuel rails were the easiest spot for me to measure.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2018, 10:51 AM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Trey, make sure whatever you are using for an angle finder is EXACTLY straight front to back for each measurement. It being just a bit off skew can really mess with the numbers.

And run to harbor freight and get a digital gauge if you don't have one already. The needle gauges are way inaccurate in my opinion.
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-12-2018, 10:57 AM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 1,682
Thanked 901 Times in 670 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
2.5 degrees UP from level.

Your tailshaft is DOWN 3-3.5 from level. If this is true it puts them close to the same plane.

This is exaggerated: Tailshaft: \ Driveshaft: / Rear: \
Thank you. That's what I've been thinking and saying but the number of articles and information pages I'm reading that say the pinion angle is the difference between the drive shaft angle and the angle the pinion is placed at is staggering and it pisses me off, lol. It's just confusing me because in my mind the difference between the angles is the working angle not the pinion angle. Just wanting to make sure I'm communicating properly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by randy View Post
i just dont see his driveshaft going up from the trans to the rear diff. My car is Low and i know its a 1st gen but i still have 1 degree down on my driveshaft angle. If his driveshaft is going up my guess is that he is measuring his engine angle wrong. The crank pulley and fuel rails were the easiest spot for me to measure.
I measured at the balancer just a minute ago and it's showing 2.5 to 3 degrees up from level which causes the tail shaft to point down. I think I'm going to invest in a digital angle gauge so I can stop expecting this manual gravity one to be accurate. It's hard to read as well.

If you stand on the driver's side of the car moving from front to back, my drive line looks like what Todd posted \ / \ .

Thanks everyone
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2001 BMW 540iT soon to be manual swapped and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

00 BMW 540i/6: Suspension, wheels, and ACS bits.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-12-2018, 02:58 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

The face of the U Joint is the best place to measure all the angles. I used a socket and angle finder, but a magnetic finder would be much easier as you could stick it right on the u joint.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-12-2018, 05:15 PM
randy randy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,041
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix View Post
Thank you. That's what I've been thinking and saying but the number of articles and information pages I'm reading that say the pinion angle is the difference between the drive shaft angle and the angle the pinion is placed at is staggering and it pisses me off, lol. It's just confusing me because in my mind the difference between the angles is the working angle not the pinion angle. Just wanting to make sure I'm communicating properly.



I measured at the balancer just a minute ago and it's showing 2.5 to 3 degrees up from level which causes the tail shaft to point down. I think I'm going to invest in a digital angle gauge so I can stop expecting this manual gravity one to be accurate. It's hard to read as well.

If you stand on the driver's side of the car moving from front to back, my drive line looks like what Todd posted \ / \ .

Thanks everyone
that makes no sense. the engine cant be angled up and the trans pointing down at the same time.

I have this one
https://www.amazon.com/Floureon-Incl...l+angle+finder
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net