...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2006, 05:36 PM
Bad94 Bad94 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 362
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 400 SB/T-56 combo

Does anyone have a chevy 400 SB and T-56 combo? I need to know a few things.


Thanks
__________________
Above Average Motorsports
1972 Nova, Ride Tech, Forgelines, Wilwood, Bowler Transmission, Lingenfelter, RAFT.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2006, 06:23 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad94
Does anyone have a chevy 400 SB and T-56 combo? I need to know a few things.
Perhaps if you indicated what you needed to know even folks who don't have a T56 behind a 400 SBC could help.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2006, 07:40 PM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

MKelcy.....LOL.....C'mon take it easy on the guy!


Bad94 - Ya gotta admit that was kind of a dumb post! State your business and let's get the build going on!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2006, 07:41 PM
Bad94 Bad94 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 362
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I need to know what bellhousing, flywheel, clutch, and if you have the block changed from 2 piece to 1 piece rear main


Cause i dont think that you can run a 400 with a T-56 unless u get the flywheel that is like $400, and im not game for that.


I was thinking of running a McLeod bellhousing old school flywheel and LS1 clutch set up and LS1 T-56, would work on a 400.
__________________
Above Average Motorsports
1972 Nova, Ride Tech, Forgelines, Wilwood, Bowler Transmission, Lingenfelter, RAFT.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2006, 08:29 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad94
I need to know what bellhousing, flywheel, clutch, and if you have the block changed from 2 piece to 1 piece rear main

Cause i dont think that you can run a 400 with a T-56 unless u get the flywheel that is like $400, and im not game for that.

I was thinking of running a McLeod bellhousing old school flywheel and LS1 clutch set up and LS1 T-56, would work on a 400.
There's no magic to the 400 SBC, other than the possibility of it being externally balanced, and there's no reason (or way?) to use a 1 piece rear main seal crank in an OEM 400 SBC block. You haven't told us what car all this is going into, so we're still flying a bit blind.

IMHO, the easiest and cleanest way to swap a T56 behind a traditional BBC/SBC, is to use an LS1 T56 and the McLeod adapter kit (1/2” thick adapter plate that goes between the transmission and the bellhousing, extended pilot bushing, and “collar” on which the throwout bearing rides - http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku). You will likely also need a transmission cross member, a shortened driveshaft, which you can have made up locally, and an electronic speedometer or an electronic to mechanical converter (pricey!).

Using these parts you can use any standard Chevy bellhousing (or a scattershield), the standard Chevy flywheel of your choice and the standard Chevy "push" style clutch setup of your choice. If your car came equiped from the factory with a mechanical clutch linkage, you can likely use that as well. If the factory didn't make a mechanical clutch linkage, or if you don't like mechanical linkages, you can use an hydraulic TO bearing.

The "pull" style clutch, which requires the expensive flywheel and clutch you're writing about is only needed with the LT1 T56.

If space in the tranmision tunnel is REALLY tight, you could go with the McLeod Modular bellhousing, which moves the transmission closer to the engine (by 0.5") and tapers down in size that much faster.

If you tell us what car it's going into, we might be able to help more.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2006, 08:50 PM
Bad94 Bad94 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 362
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Mkelcy thanks for that info, very helpful


Im looking to put a 400 and T-56 in my 94 S-10.

The truck has a 4.3L with 5 speed right now.


I was told that the T-56 is hard to put behind a 400 cause of the flywheel problem.


My bro has a 91 S-10 4.3L with a Lt1 T-56 and we did a 01 S-10 with a 4.3L that we did a LS1 T-56


Im just tryied of this V6 crap
__________________
Above Average Motorsports
1972 Nova, Ride Tech, Forgelines, Wilwood, Bowler Transmission, Lingenfelter, RAFT.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2006, 09:19 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad94
Mkelcy thanks for that info, very helpful.
No problem. If you have any additional questions, please ask. We're always happy to help.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net