|

05-19-2021, 01:21 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,168
Thanks: 6,489
Thanked 1,969 Times in 888 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 214Chevy
|
Exactly!
|

05-20-2021, 07:24 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 83
Thanks: 3
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb
Always does. Starts out looking nice and open and as stuff is added the room is gone lol. The intake will be bending to the drivers side, across the top and then down. The real fun will be getting it out of and into the intercooler. With the four headlights of the 70 I can't fit it through the radiator support like on Malitude, so it'll have to snake underneath around the frame, hopefully not hanging down and visible from the front of the car.
|
Is the engine intended to be installed that far forward? Seems very far forward. My passenger head has 3/4" between it and the firewall, I see you can fit your coils between the head and firewall!
__________________
72 Chevelle. 370ci LS, Forced inductions S476, SpeedTech Suspension equipped, C6 Z06 brakes
|
The Following User Says Thank You to protour For This Useful Post:
|
|

05-20-2021, 10:02 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,168
Thanks: 6,489
Thanked 1,969 Times in 888 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by protour
Is the engine intended to be installed that far forward? Seems very far forward. My passenger head has 3/4" between it and the firewall, I see you can fit your coils between the head and firewall!
|
Funny you mentioned that. I've been debating moving it back, there's advantages and disadvantages. I have the Dirty Dingo sliders so it'd be easy to slide back. My buddies 72 is in the same position and rides and handles just fine.
The reason I had it forward was "street car" so the difference in weight balance wasn't a major concern to me. Plus I wanted a simple coil relocation setup, I like the looks and fit of the ADE brackets. It also gives me more room at the back of the engine for EFI wiring, and access to the bellhousing bolts.
Moving it back gets me better weight balance, and more room between the radiator and engine. Might also be the difference in not having to trim the inner hood for intake clearance. But now I have to find a spot to mount the coils (not a huge deal). Turbo position should work but will be closer to the inner fender. Will have to re-do my upper radiator hose, and the rear fuel line into the intake, but minor stuff. IF I'm going to do it now is the time.
Bottom line, it was easier to do it the way I did, but since when are these cars supposed to be easy?
|

05-20-2021, 11:15 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 83
Thanks: 3
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb
Funny you mentioned that. I've been debating moving it back, there's advantages and disadvantages. I have the Dirty Dingo sliders so it'd be easy to slide back. My buddies 72 is in the same position and rides and handles just fine.
The reason I had it forward was "street car" so the difference in weight balance wasn't a major concern to me. Plus I wanted a simple coil relocation setup, I like the looks and fit of the ADE brackets. It also gives me more room at the back of the engine for EFI wiring, and access to the bellhousing bolts.
Moving it back gets me better weight balance, and more room between the radiator and engine. Might also be the difference in not having to trim the inner hood for intake clearance. But now I have to find a spot to mount the coils (not a huge deal). Turbo position should work but will be closer to the inner fender. Will have to re-do my upper radiator hose, and the rear fuel line into the intake, but minor stuff. IF I'm going to do it now is the time.
Bottom line, it was easier to do it the way I did, but since when are these cars supposed to be easy? 
|
I was scratching my head at the space between the rad and front drive. I run truck accessories and was wondering how in the world I have more room than a car front drive haha.
I definitely understand you're reasoning! It does look great so far, just had to mention it
__________________
72 Chevelle. 370ci LS, Forced inductions S476, SpeedTech Suspension equipped, C6 Z06 brakes
|

05-20-2021, 11:28 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 1,172
Thanked 529 Times in 290 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb
Funny you mentioned that. I've been debating moving it back, there's advantages and disadvantages. I have the Dirty Dingo sliders so it'd be easy to slide back. My buddies 72 is in the same position and rides and handles just fine.
The reason I had it forward was "street car" so the difference in weight balance wasn't a major concern to me. Plus I wanted a simple coil relocation setup, I like the looks and fit of the ADE brackets. It also gives me more room at the back of the engine for EFI wiring, and access to the bellhousing bolts.
Moving it back gets me better weight balance, and more room between the radiator and engine. Might also be the difference in not having to trim the inner hood for intake clearance. But now I have to find a spot to mount the coils (not a huge deal). Turbo position should work but will be closer to the inner fender. Will have to re-do my upper radiator hose, and the rear fuel line into the intake, but minor stuff. IF I'm going to do it now is the time.
Bottom line, it was easier to do it the way I did, but since when are these cars supposed to be easy? 
|
Since we are critiquing your build do you have any concerns about exhaust heat cooking your fan motors? It looks close in the pics. I know you can wrap the pipe but the insulation is not perfect. That being said I don’t know chit about building a turbo engine
Don
|

05-20-2021, 02:05 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 693
Thanks: 78
Thanked 227 Times in 156 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton
Since we are critiquing your build do you have any concerns about exhaust heat cooking your fan motors? It looks close in the pics. I know you can wrap the pipe but the insulation is not perfect. That being said I don’t know chit about building a turbo engine
Don
|
I've had similar thoughts as well. Lots of these turbo set-ups on the NET & it's always had me wondering about exhaust heat related impact on items not normally subjected to the issue.
|

05-20-2021, 02:11 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,168
Thanks: 6,489
Thanked 1,969 Times in 888 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton
Since we are critiquing your build do you have any concerns about exhaust heat cooking your fan motors? It looks close in the pics. I know you can wrap the pipe but the insulation is not perfect. That being said I don’t know chit about building a turbo engine
Don
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotI
I've had similar thoughts as well. Lots of these turbo set-ups on the NET & it's always had me wondering about exhaust heat related impact on items not normally subjected to the issue.
|
I don't. For one, I just moved the engine back 2"...  Plus I'm going to use Zycoat on the pipe; they claim it reduces radiant heat by 90%. Reviews look very good. If I'm not happy I'll also wrap it. On Malitude the pipes I wrapped with Thermotec wrap could be touched after driving without burning.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to camcojb For This Useful Post:
|
|

05-24-2021, 08:05 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,168
Thanks: 6,489
Thanked 1,969 Times in 888 Posts
|
|
Changed my mind and decided to remake the upper hose tubing, to get both bends in stainless 1.5" tubing. Moving the engine back gave me the additional room, before it was too close to get the 90 degree bend into the radiator in solid tubing, the molded hose could do a tighter bend.
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to camcojb For This Useful Post:
|
|

05-25-2021, 08:20 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 1,172
Thanked 529 Times in 290 Posts
|
|
Hi Jody. What are you using to put the bead in the tube?
Thanks,
Don
|

05-25-2021, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,168
Thanks: 6,489
Thanked 1,969 Times in 888 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton
Hi Jody. What are you using to put the bead in the tube?
Thanks,
Don
|
Don,
I've had the Bead Form bead roller for many years, works fantastic. At the time there weren't many others, but now there's several similar units.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to camcojb For This Useful Post:
|
|
Tags
|
70 chevelle, aeromotive, american powertrain, amsoil, baer brakes, borgeson, clayton machine, currie, dakota digital, eddie motorsports, forgeline, holley performance, hydratech, ididit, lateral-g, lokar, magnaflow, mcleod racing, mighty mouse solutions, modo innovations, morris classic concepts, painless performance, protouring, restomodair, roadster shop, rock valley antique auto parts, ron davis, texas speed, thermotec, tmi products, vintage air  |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.
|