...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:58 AM
Silver69Camaro Silver69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by two68s View Post

2010 Camaro = swing and a miss
A 400+HP RWD 6-speed in today's auto industry is a miss? Really? Tough crowd.

By the looks of it the new Camaros may use a Macpherson strut suspension...that would be dissapointing.
__________________
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:59 AM
rogue rogue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 721
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HWY Nova View Post
Hey rogue...... are you in Santa Barbara?


--Eric
I drove up there for the day to visit my sister... I live just above downtown LA.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:00 AM
rogue rogue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 721
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayR View Post
Very cool! I see MI plates. Was he from GM? Driver have a backstory?
Automotive journalist, I think for autoblog?

Very nice guy but he didn't want to race, I tried
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:08 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayR View Post
Very cool! I see MI plates. Was he from GM? Driver have a backstory?
I see it has an M plate.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:27 AM
Musclerodz's Avatar
Musclerodz Musclerodz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: washington, ok
Posts: 4,286
Thanks: 22
Thanked 164 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Not digging it at all and now the interior sucks as well. All the cool features of the concept cars are gone in the production car.
__________________
Mike Redpath
Musclerodz & Customz
facebook page
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:51 AM
Josh69 Josh69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 404
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I built my '69 firebird for the sole purpose to be able to choose which one I wanted when the new one came out. I'm glad I did, because I'll be keeping it.

The new one looks nice. I'd like to see one lowered with the right rims, a few custom touches, exhaust, headers, cam, etc. and it could be a winner, but so far I find it boring...so I'll wait until I see one done the way I'd want to build it and go from there.
__________________
1969 Firebird, Black w/Parchment Arizen interior, 383 Pontiac Stroker (350/428 crank), TKO600, Moser 12 bolt, 18" TTII's, Hotchkis, GW, DSE, Speed Tech, Vintage A/C, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:22 AM
Karps TA Karps TA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Muskego, WI
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Overall I like the look, but where GM missed is by making it too much of a niche vehicle. I just can't see too many people being able to live with a car like that as their own car on a daily basis. I just saw one at the auto show and looking at the interior, there is zero leg room for the back seats, and ontop of that the opening for the trunk is so tiny. I'm guessing you'd be able to fit a carry on piece of luggage thru the hole at best. I don't see you being able to fit say a cooler, or something like golf clubs in it at all. From that standpoint the 4th gens made for a more legit daily driven vehicle.

IMO the car almost becomes a slightly bigger/expensive Solstice/Skyy. Not sure in this economy people have that kinda of coin to finance a toy.

It's too bad IMO. It's definetly got potential.
__________________
1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:35 AM
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
buickfunnycar.com buickfunnycar.com is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Monterey Peninsula,CA
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tones2SS View Post
Yeah, those "new" Camaros do not do anything for me.
The '69 looks 10x meaner and nicer in my opinion.
X2...new Camaro does absolutely nothing for me.
__________________
'67 Buick Skylark GS400 Funny Car "Ingenue"...World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car/Aug '10 Hot Rod featured car
World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car!

www.buickfunnycar.com
http://www.facebook.com/ingenuebuickfunnycar
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-02-2009, 12:22 PM
DOOM's Avatar
DOOM DOOM is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Side Chicago
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 7
Thanked 64 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Man its just like looking in a mirror ARE YOU KIDDING ME! Once again the GENERAL drops the ball. A Mustang looks like a 60's and 70's Mustang ,the Challenger, well looks like a 70 Challenger. The minute they released the Challenger someone should of sent the design team back to the drawing board ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How can anyone look at these pictures and say these cars even closely resemble a 67,68 or a 69 Camaro. Am I mistaken is this not what GM was going for? Man something got lost in translation here... Sorry guys this is just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions
__________________
Mario
USCOLLISION
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-02-2009, 01:53 PM
rogue rogue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 721
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOM View Post
Man its just like looking in a mirror ARE YOU KIDDING ME! Once again the GENERAL drops the ball. A Mustang looks like a 60's and 70's Mustang ,the Challenger, well looks like a 70 Challenger. The minute they released the Challenger someone should of sent the design team back to the drawing board ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How can anyone look at these pictures and say these cars even closely resemble a 67,68 or a 69 Camaro. Am I mistaken is this not what GM was going for? Man something got lost in translation here... Sorry guys this is just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions
If you want a 69 go buy one. The car was intended to be inspired by the first gen body style and it obviously is.

I'd say they met their goal regardless if you care for it or not.

And if you think the new challenger is a closer representation than the original than the new camaro is to a 69, I suggest you take another look.




is that an SUV or a "muscle car"?

These modern interpretations of muscle cars are just that, interpretations. Lots of people may not like it in these photos, but I promise you, within a month of people getting their hands on them, you're going to love the new camaro and change your tune...

Wheels, a drop, some minor changes, they're going to be BADASS.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net