...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > LSX Conversions
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-13-2012, 09:22 PM
67RS/SSx2 67RS/SSx2 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Gotta love an LS engine in a 69 Camaro!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-14-2012, 07:24 AM
GRob GRob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Payton, why are you selling your car? Saw it on eBay. A shame.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-14-2012, 08:13 AM
Payton King's Avatar
Payton King Payton King is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,576
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Default Yep

going to build a track car.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-14-2012, 10:22 AM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by classiccamaro View Post
By the way..... RYBAR, your car rocks!! I followed the thread on your upgrade with the rims/tires. I just love the stance, color, etc.... Given that you have the LS1.....would you say that your car has a ton of power, punch, or problem breaking those BIG rear tires loose I'm a big block guy, so I have really come to love the torque aspect of a street motor, if you know what I mean?
Well a stock cube 346 cannot match the torque of a BBC. But top end HP on 5.7-6.2 LSX can equal milder BBC's. If you want torque then I would really go for the largest cube motor, maybe a cam with a broader torque range. My setup lacks low end but can easily spin the 335's at will. It's a little more peaky but on the upper RPM it's moves pretty good.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-14-2012, 12:25 PM
NOPANTS68 NOPANTS68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orangevale CA
Posts: 916
Thanks: 2
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Like Rybar said- the BBC torque won't be there unless you add some cubes to the equation, but keep in mind that you will be touting around 200 less lbs as well. All of it comes right off the nose of the car too.

FWIW- I ran 325/50/15 MT drag radials @ 18 PSI and could fry them at will with my little 346 and a T56.
__________________
1929 Roadster Pickup
1961 Chevy Parkwood Wagon
1956 Chevy 210


Smithcraft Collision and Restoration
Newcastle , CA
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-29-2012, 11:06 PM
JMitch19's Avatar
JMitch19 JMitch19 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Caledonia,MI
Posts: 406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar View Post
I just looked up the 799 Heads, they seem like a decent stock head. I'd deck them to gain compression and seems with a mild cam you should be around 430 rwhp according to LS1tech. That's pretty good power.
The 799 is the same as the 243(01-04 Z06) head minus the light weight valves. For the money they are really hard to beat.

If your thinking about having any work done to the heads do yourself a favor and look at http://www.advancedinduction.com/LSX...43GMPRHead.php If you spend much time on ls1tech.com you will see lots of people raving about their head program.
__________________
Jason Mitchell

1971 Camaro 416 LT1 Project
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net