...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-06-2014, 08:42 PM
6carmello8 6carmello8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72Z/28 View Post
Well have a look at the Speedtech yellow 69 camaro they have recently installed their suspension kit and the exhaust. You will have an idea and notice they have fabricated theirs and welded them in pieces in order to get the tailpipes fit with their Rear suspension. They did use a 2.5" size as well
Have you considered dumping them right after the muffler?
I've noticed a lot of people trying to bend their way over and around things back there where you can just dump them right after the muffler. You'll also save time and money if you run it that way. In addition, I think that Camaro's look better without exhaust tips in the rear. The back end of that design is so clean that you really don't need them. What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-09-2014, 01:58 PM
DETON8R's Avatar
DETON8R DETON8R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scotts Valley, CA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

A few more photos here on this thread:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=37954


Quote:
Originally Posted by 6carmello8 View Post
Have you considered dumping them right after the muffler?
I've noticed a lot of people trying to bend their way over and around things back there where you can just dump them right after the muffler. You'll also save time and money if you run it that way. In addition, I think that Camaro's look better without exhaust tips in the rear. The back end of that design is so clean that you really don't need them. What do you think?
I has a 1967 with a 396, long tubes and the exhaust dumped right ahead of the 3rd member. Sounded amazing around town, especially when I romped on it. Didn't sound so great at highway speeds, the drone came right up through the floor. As a young man, I loved the sound wherever I drove it, but nobody else did. And now that I'm older (and wiser?!?) I don't think that I'd dump the exhaust like that, just to make drive ability on the highway more tolerable.
__________________
DETONATOR - 69 Camaro RS
LS1 - T56 - Chris Alston Frame - 2" drop
G-Link Rear - 4.20 gears in 9" - Mini Tubs
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-09-2014, 04:24 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Here are pics of mine showing custom tailpipe routing around the G-link and stock width Ricks tank that is not dog eared.





__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-14-2014, 05:46 PM
6carmello8 6carmello8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DETON8R View Post
A few more photos here on this thread:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=37954




I has a 1967 with a 396, long tubes and the exhaust dumped right ahead of the 3rd member. Sounded amazing around town, especially when I romped on it. Didn't sound so great at highway speeds, the drone came right up through the floor. As a young man, I loved the sound wherever I drove it, but nobody else did. And now that I'm older (and wiser?!?) I don't think that I'd dump the exhaust like that, just to make drive ability on the highway more tolerable.
You didn't mention a muffler...Did you mean dumped after the third member with a muffler? If this is true, I had no idea that the extra 3 feet after the muffler (aprox) made such a significant difference in sound even say with like a Flowmaster Super 44, but you make a good point since the exhaust is dumped right around the rear end. I'm 33 and I don't want a super loud exhaust. The car is flashy as it is and I don't want it overly loud exhaust. Figuring out the right sound is gonna be a nightmare for me ugh...getting a headache just thinking about it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-14-2014, 07:46 PM
TheJDMan's Avatar
TheJDMan TheJDMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 690
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
Default

This is how I ran my exhaust. Very simple. I have had to remove it several times and this setup is easy to put on and take off.

__________________
Steve Hayes
"Dust Off"
68 Camaro
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you!
"Jeremy Clarkson"
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-16-2014, 09:10 AM
DETON8R's Avatar
DETON8R DETON8R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scotts Valley, CA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6carmello8 View Post
You didn't mention a muffler...Did you mean dumped after the third member with a muffler? If this is true, I had no idea that the extra 3 feet after the muffler (aprox) made such a significant difference in sound even say with like a Flowmaster Super 44, but you make a good point since the exhaust is dumped right around the rear end. I'm 33 and I don't want a super loud exhaust. The car is flashy as it is and I don't want it overly loud exhaust. Figuring out the right sound is gonna be a nightmare for me ugh...getting a headache just thinking about it.
The photo that TheJDMan posted is very similar to the exhaust set up that I used.

I wouldn't say that the exhaust was particularly loud, the turbo style mufflers and exhaust were 2-1/2" and the sound wasn't obnoxious or excessively loud for the average hot rod of the day. I owned the car from 1988 to 1997, and I never had a noise complaint. And after driving cars with 3" exhausts and cars with glasspacks noise level could have been much worse, but it wasn't loud for this particular car/exhaust set up.

What I really would have done different is route the exhaust to the tail of the car, as it keeps the sound from the getting "trapped" in the third-member tunnel, because the tunnel acted like an echo chamber. The sound/pressure pulses exited the exhaust, reflected off the pavement then up into the tunnel, and the noise came up through the back seat. When the engine varies in RPM it wasn't noticeable, but at freeway speeds and constant RPM, the low frequency tone, often called the "droning" sound, would just rumble from the floor pan up into the cabin.

Most of the time it didn't bother me, it was a hot rod, the sound of the car is part of the driving experience. For me personally, the only time I noticed it in a negative way was after a long/hard day of work driving in the afternoon, the noise fatigue would be more noticeable because of my mental and physical fatigue. The kids in the car seats, my wife, etc. didn't have the same driving experience that they had in other cars (from a noise perspective), they were much less tolerant of the drone across the board.

And I know that drone can be experienced with the exhaust exiting the rear of the car too, part of it is the muffler design.

If you plan to use it for long hauls, I think it is a consideration. Getting the exhaust to the rear of the car will reduce the drone as it will take some of the noise and move it to the rear of the car, eliminating the noise from under the car.
__________________
DETONATOR - 69 Camaro RS
LS1 - T56 - Chris Alston Frame - 2" drop
G-Link Rear - 4.20 gears in 9" - Mini Tubs
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net