...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-12-2006, 10:58 AM
trapin's Avatar
trapin trapin is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Michigan
Posts: 692
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I don't deny they're great engines. I just wish they weren't so much of a hassell to upgrade and put in your car. But that said, they're amazing powerplants and you can't beat the weight savings for competition.
__________________
Tony Rapin
The Pigeon Forge Project
A 1968 Pro-Touring LS1 Camaro.........and why not?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-12-2006, 12:47 PM
rocketman's Avatar
rocketman rocketman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mo
Posts: 718
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have built acouple Ls style engine's and they are no cheaper to build,and I think a little more to build than a SBC.

How many of use guy's on here are going to drive the car hard enough to notice having an alumunin block.And there's only 70 pd's differnet in a steel block and aluminum block.


I have never seen a Lsx engine in stock form rwph 400hp.the best i have seen was 348rhwp in a 01 vette.My zo6 didnt rw 400 and the Ls6 is the 2nd best Ls engine next a Ls7.

I am not saying there bad they are good engine's,but they aren't as cheap as people think.and IMO not worth changing out a current SBC set-up just for a LS
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-12-2006, 01:55 PM
Diognes56's Avatar
Diognes56 Diognes56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

SBC's and BBC's aren't going anywhere, LSx's are just another option. Depending on what needs to be done to a car it may be logical to stick with the SBC's or BBC's but in other cases it might be reasonable to go with a LSx. It also depends on budget and personal taste. Someday (when I have more money ) I will get a LSx for my '56, but that is what I like and it makes sense because I have to have to fix/change things that the previous owner and time had done to the car anyway (motor mounts, radiator, gas tank, etc).

David
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-12-2006, 03:44 PM
MarkM66's Avatar
MarkM66 MarkM66 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Doesn't look like the LS1 has a weight advantage. Even with an aluminum block.

Posted by Steve1968LS2:

457.6 lbs, LS1 auto; 497.2 lbs, LS1/LS6 manual

From Chevy2only; http://www.chevy2only.com/index.php?..._position=54:8

Weights are from carb to oil pan with HEI dist, harmonic balancer, and iron water pump.

SMALL BLOCK
All iron small block 520 lbs.
Alum heads w/iron small block 480 lbs.
All alum motor 389 lbs.

BIG BLOCK
All iron BB 754 lbs.
Alum heads with iron block 660 lbs.
All alum BB 501 lbs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net