LS-7 or Stroked LS-2?

[lil427z]

I think the LS7 is a better bang for the buck, but I'm old and sometimes stupid.
:lol
sturt your not old . you just like what you like.
rick k

[XcYZ]

Originally Posted by dave96dcm

The new L92 heads are basically the same port as the LS7 and i think the flow #'s were 330 - 340 cfm.

Similar maybe, but there big are differences... valve angle, size, CNC'd runners and chambers... That's not to say the L92 couldn't be massaged to flow what the LS7 heads flow, but then the LS7 heads can be massaged as well.

[tyoneal]

Any Idea's on the price of a SC LS2 with 700 hp?
Any idea's on the price of a N/A or SC LS7 with 700 hp?

Thoughts to consider:

Dependability
Streetable Power
Cost
Broad Power Band

Thanks,

Ty

[XcYZ]

You'd never be able to supercharge an LS7 without opening the motor up. It would definitely need forged pistons and lower compression.

I don't know what a supercharged LS2 would cost, but it sounds like a good topic for discussion.

[JayR]

Originally Posted by dave96dcm

The new L92 heads are basically the same port as the LS7 and i think the flow #'s were 330 - 340 cfm.

Not only that, but they work killer with the L76 intake and the whole package, heads and intake can be sent to your door complete for under a grand and are good for 150hp with a cam swap!!

The initial 400hp package is a huge bang for the buck and the GM Performance Parts are even more so!

[Stuart Adams]

Originally Posted by JayR

Not only that, but they work killer with the L76 intake and the whole package, heads and intake can be sent to your door complete for under a grand and are good for 150hp with a cam swap!!

The initial 400hp package is a huge bang for the buck and the GM Performance Parts are even more so!

Heads and intake for under a grand