Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hectore3
Still does not get to the elephant in the room. GM and other domestics in the business built crappy cars for years. The worker on the assembly line did not tell CEO's like Roger Smith etc. to go and buy all kinds of unrelated companies in the 80's and 90's and then lose their shirts. Or should I say the line assembly guys shirts?
|
Ah, but let's look at a few things our own government has done to help kill the big elephant! Way back around the time of the first couple of gas crunches, our government instituted a bunch of crash standards, as well as emissions standards. Then, because many of the imports got such great mileage, our government exempted those imports from the standards!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hectore3
I'm looking out the window right now and saw a early Chevy Lumina with huge sheets of "water based" paint peeling off it. What a great introduction to General Motors products eh?
|
Again, why did GM, Ford, and Chrysler have trouble with the water based paints? Because they were forced to use them to meet emission standars. The way a new car has its emissions tested for federal standards is by measuring ALL of the emissions the car give off, including those made from the curing of glues, plastics, and paint. A car shipped from overseas won't have as hard a time meeting those standards because it cures on the boat.
Add to all of this that, even now when the imports build cars in the US, they manage to skirt paying any taxes, have no Unions, Etc, and you can see why they still have some unfair advantages. On top of this, you have a fickle population that views anything the domestics build as inferior despite any evidence to the contrary.
Funny too that enviromentalists love the imports, especially Japanese imports, this despite the fact that Japan kills more elephants, whales, dolphins, and sharks than any other country in the world.
Shiny Side Up!
Bill