Quote:
Originally Posted by streetfytr68
You guys have it easy. When Stielow and I bought our "bolt on" C4 clips back in 1999, we basically got screwed. The difference is that Mark is a suspension engineer, so he immediately went to work on alterations. But I'm a marketing guy. So I looked at the clip and said "C4 A-arms & spindles--cool!" I probably spent $12K over the years in do-overs to make the clip right on the 3rd try (Stielow cautioned me after try #1, but I didn't listen).
|
I have one of those C4 bolt on clips myself! And I now have it working pretty well - but not to level I expect from my new DSE.
To Ty's question, I too would go with whatever Mark Magers at LD recommends. The one thing I do think is good about the Morrison is the custom steering arms to allow lower rack position, and therefore lower motor position - but an inch up or down on motor C.G. isn't enough to make a decision on.
On the Heidts clip, I don't know much about it, but given all of the choices out there, here's what I would use as a sort of basic litmus test:
- Can the manufacturer provide data (graphs) of Camber Gain, Bump Steer, Front View Swing Arm, Roll Center, and Side View Swing Arm? If they can't, then it's a crap shoot how well the clip will handle. Bonus: have they done any FEA to determine torsional rigidity of the clip?
On the 4-link handling question, there was quite a thread here about a year ago on 3-link vs. 4-link. Bottom line, from my perspective: 3-link is ultimately a superior design on paper, but both can be engineered to provide excellent results and it depends more on the goals of the designer and the execution than the number of links per se. And to greatly oversimplify, the Quadralink, compared to the LD 3-link, seems to be engineered to give up some handling performance ideals, and adjustability, in order to simplify packaging and installation. But the people who have it seem to love it ...
The European school, way overly simplified again, tends to use stiffer springing and damping with less anti-roll bar. This results a firmer ride for a given amount of roll stiffness, but allows the front/rear wheel pairs more independence, keeps the damping ratios more constant, and reduces pitching and instability over uneven surfaces. Basically, the American school corners flatter, the European school feels more stable and "planted".
And once again, to echo Steve's point, I have to say it's great to be able to make choices between so many good options.