...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #271  
Old 03-01-2019, 06:34 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD Automotive View Post
Look at the engine offset!

Coming together and looking good.
Tt is all due to the rack location and oil pan, The way Sweet builds the racks is that when they narrow them, the pinion also moves closer to the center, we ran into this on the Extreme front end and ended up having to use a wider rack to clear the LS oil pan rail which is wider then even a big block.

It is ALWAYS the rack the dictates the placement of EVERYTHING. if you want the geometry correct.
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Blake Foster For This Useful Post:
craig510 (03-01-2019), fleetus macmullitz (03-02-2019), gofastwclass (03-05-2019), slimjim (03-01-2019)
  #272  
Old 03-01-2019, 07:19 AM
CJD Automotive's Avatar
CJD Automotive CJD Automotive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 256
Thanks: 61
Thanked 207 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake Foster View Post
Tt is all due to the rack location and oil pan, The way Sweet builds the racks is that when they narrow them, the pinion also moves closer to the center, we ran into this on the Extreme front end and ended up having to use a wider rack to clear the LS oil pan rail which is wider then even a big block.

It is ALWAYS the rack the dictates the placement of EVERYTHING. if you want the geometry correct.
Gotcha, didn't realize that about the racks. I thought it was moved over for weight distribution to offset the driver.
__________________
Craig Scholl
CJD Automotive, LLC

www.CJDAUTOMOTIVE.com

"I own a Mopar, so I already know it won't be in stock, won't ship tomorrow, and won't actually fit without modification."
Reply With Quote
  #273  
Old 03-01-2019, 08:04 AM
mitch_04 mitch_04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Was the MSD Airforce intake chose because of size or performance? I'm interested in different builders opinions in intake manifolds, why MSD instead of Fast or Holley or....
Reply With Quote
  #274  
Old 03-02-2019, 10:29 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch_04 View Post
Was the MSD Airforce intake chose because of size or performance? I'm interested in different builders opinions in intake manifolds, why MSD instead of Fast or Holley or....


Because it makes 25hp and 25Tq over the others......


Easy choice
Reply With Quote
  #275  
Old 03-02-2019, 12:13 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD Automotive View Post
Gotcha, didn't realize that about the racks. I thought it was moved over for weight distribution to offset the driver.
One thing he did appear to get right was the corner balancing and this should have helped I'd think?
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #276  
Old 03-02-2019, 07:32 PM
Turbo6inKY Turbo6inKY is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 17
Thanks: 5
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
One thing he did appear to get right was the corner balancing and this should have helped I'd think?
Concentrating on one thing to the exception of all others never helps.
__________________
Andrew Scott
1987 Buick Grand National
Web Log
Instagram
Youtube
Reply With Quote
  #277  
Old 03-03-2019, 07:05 AM
mitch_04 mitch_04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Because it makes 25hp and 25Tq over the others......


Easy choice
Did they test on this engine or is that from a different test?

Not doubting or anything, just curious! I don't have a lot of money so what I spend needs to be researched well!
Reply With Quote
  #278  
Old 03-03-2019, 11:27 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch_04 View Post
Did they test on this engine or is that from a different test?

Not doubting or anything, just curious! I don't have a lot of money so what I spend needs to be researched well!


No Mitch, no testing here — but if you search the ‘net — the MSD seems to be the current power maker. Lots of info about them - and tests done against others etc.
Reply With Quote
  #279  
Old 03-03-2019, 12:45 PM
Che70velle's Avatar
Che70velle Che70velle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 2,249
Thanks: 645
Thanked 177 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Great to see this thing coming along so well Greg. What electronics will run this engine?
__________________
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------
70 velle' on custom chassis w/custom RideTech coilovers, RED sleeved 434” with Mamo 265’s, F-body Magnum, 12 bolt 3:73, wilwood 6/4's, bla, bla, bla...build. thread https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=39631
New 434” engine build here https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ved-block.html

Thanks Dad!!

My Chevelle is old school... It has a belt driven power steering pump.
They're 17's, but I keep em clean!
Reply With Quote
  #280  
Old 03-03-2019, 03:18 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Che70velle View Post
Great to see this thing coming along so well Greg. What electronics will run this engine?


It’s running a Holley Dominator
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net