...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-07-2006, 10:37 AM
slownova slownova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

$$$$$$$
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-07-2006, 11:29 AM
Rob07002 Rob07002 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 199
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Matt will regular backspacing work. ei 4.5 - 4.75"?
__________________
Rob07002
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-07-2006, 04:05 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Nice!

I would be interested in a version that would allow me to use "stock replacement" type tubular upper and lower A-Arms such as DSE, GW, Speedtech, Hotchkiss, etc with coilovers.

Not everyone wants to run the C4/5 stuff.
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-07-2006, 04:19 PM
Van B's Avatar
Van B Van B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Caledonia, WI
Posts: 936
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwhite692
Nice!

I would be interested in a version that would allow me to use "stock replacement" type tubular upper and lower A-Arms such as DSE, GW, Speedtech, Hotchkiss, etc with coilovers.

Not everyone wants to run the C4/5 stuff.
This is what I was getting at with my earlier post....
__________________
Jeff


99 Miata LS6
67 Camaro Street Fighter 599 HP L92-SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-07-2006, 05:17 PM
awr68's Avatar
awr68 awr68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,478
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Yeah many of us have all the suspension parts and just need the frame and perhaps a rack. I have DSE arms, QA1 c/o's, and a Unisteer rack...
__________________
Tony
'68 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-07-2006, 06:21 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Nice job Craig, and you guys are pretty close to me. Maybe a future upgrade.... Also interested if it can accept aftermarket arms
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-07-2006, 06:57 PM
23corner_blitz 23corner_blitz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigMorrison


Just took pics for the 07 catalog yesterday, and couldn't wait to share this with you guys! Pricing will be out shortly. Enjoy the sneak peek!




you wouldn't happen to be donating one to a poor college student, would you
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-07-2006, 08:22 PM
kaptainkw kaptainkw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richland, WA
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I want the first one off the line! When can I come pick it up??? Seriously! Just don't abuse us on price... please!

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-08-2006, 11:01 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

For sure a standard 4 - 4.5 BS wheel will not fit, not only that but the suspension is designed for about a 45-50 mm positive off set
so a 8.5" wheel 6.5 to 7 BS. a 4.5 BS would adversly change the scrub way too much ( i have this argument with my partner alllll the time he always wants a bigger lip on the front wheel and it is really not possible) we have built frames with c5 and made them narrower than AM will and i know you make the bump steer worse but when your putting C5 into a 66Nova i think the trade off of a little bump steer is worth the upgrade, besides if the rack goes in the optomimum position it is not that bad our last one we ended up with .071 deg of toe change in 1.0 inches of travel and .157 toe out @ 2" of compression ant the track width is 53.5"
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-08-2006, 12:08 PM
Beach Cruiser's Avatar
Beach Cruiser Beach Cruiser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va
Posts: 603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Any Chance you'll be producing one that will support the C4 stuff?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net