...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-09-2012, 11:06 PM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member and Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 11,272
Thanks: 3,465
Thanked 3,767 Times in 2,230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFRESH View Post
How dare you say that.
Sorry Doug, of course yours is special too...



__________________
Skip

Last edited by fleetus macmullitz; 08-13-2012 at 04:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 08-10-2012, 06:02 AM
Jay Hilliard's Avatar
Jay Hilliard Jay Hilliard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 1,119
Thanks: 34
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Looking great. Nice job.
__________________
Jay
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 08-10-2012, 06:26 AM
SLO_Z28 SLO_Z28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 468
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

How much rear camber are you running with that floater? What posi are you using?
__________________
James F.
1974 Camaro Z28
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 08-10-2012, 11:39 AM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

James and Rodger, the project is looking great. Love those ideas with the cage.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 08-12-2012, 09:57 AM
sik68's Avatar
sik68 sik68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironworks View Post
Absolutely love this build!

I have a question on the fabricated base for the main hoop. The load path seems a little suspect, as the main hoop loads during a crash have to get transfered through the relatively thin sheet of the fabricated box. Do you think that box is strong enough to not puncture or deform during a crash?

Thanks,
S
__________________
Steven

1968 Camaro: "TRACKDAY"

Build In Progress: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=10706

Last edited by sik68; 08-12-2012 at 10:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 08-12-2012, 01:15 PM
HWY Nova HWY Nova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Santa Ynez, CA
Posts: 888
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sik68 View Post
Absolutely love this build!

I have a question on the fabricated base for the main hoop. The load path seems a little suspect, as the main hoop loads during a crash have to get transfered through the relatively thin sheet of the fabricated box. Do you think that box is strong enough to not puncture or deform during a crash?

Thanks,
S
What thickness do you consider to be thin? The boxes are probably 1/8" thick.

--Eric
__________________
ET
63 Nova Coupe
63 Nova Wagon
62 Nova Convertible
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 08-12-2012, 05:35 PM
James OLC's Avatar
James OLC James OLC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Built to the rules and to the prefered design:

Quote:
15.6.13 Mounting Points
The roll cage shall be mounted to the floor area of the car in six, seven, or eight points. The cage shall not go through the firewall. The seventh and eighth points must attach to the firewall or front fender wells. All cage attachment points must be mounted to plates or a mounting box (plinth). Each required cage bar shall terminate on a plate with a 360 degree weld to the mounting plate, except as specified in Section 15.6.14.B. There shall be only one (1) mounting “point” per plate. This point is defined as where the “required tube” mounts. All additional tubes mounted to that plate must be mounted as close to the required tube as possible [Ref: (15.6.14.B)]. It is recommended that plinth boxes use a bottom support plate in cases where the edges of the box may punch through the sheet metal.

15.6.14 Mounting Plates
Each mounting plate shall be no greater than one hundred (100) square inches and no greater than twelve (12) inches or less than two (2) inches on a side. Welded mounting plates shall be at least 0.080-inch thick. Plates may extend onto vertical sections of the structure. Any mounting plate may be multi-angled, but shall not exceed one hundred (100) square inches total including vertical sections. Each mounting plate should have an area of not less than nine (9) square inches.
and yes - I would consider them to be on par with the subframe or subframe connectors wrt strength.
__________________
James
1967 Camaro RS - The OLC
1967 Camaro RS - Recycler
1969 Camaro - Dusty
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 08-12-2012, 05:58 PM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,156
Thanks: 4
Thanked 35 Times in 21 Posts
Default

So your saying I was not supposed to form them from .020 aluminum? But I painted them with steel colored spray paint. Krylon none the less.......GEEZ
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com

Last edited by ironworks; 08-12-2012 at 08:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 08-12-2012, 07:58 PM
sik68's Avatar
sik68 sik68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Good to know thanks guys
__________________
Steven

1968 Camaro: "TRACKDAY"

Build In Progress: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=10706
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 08-12-2012, 11:39 PM
SLO_Z28 SLO_Z28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 468
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The point he is making is that you have only about 1.25 sq inches (assuming its .125 x 6(4x2 patch) as opposed to the surface area of part where the main hoop connects which would be 8 sq inches. You load the main hoop and it would act like a lever arm on the frame and deform. To reduce that you could add another plate underneath where the bend comes down from the hoop and that would slow deformation of the mounting plate.

If you got me some measurements from that picture I could do a few statics calculations and give you a basic idea of how forces would act on it in a collision.
__________________
James F.
1974 Camaro Z28
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net