...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 01-09-2006, 10:13 PM
clinthart's Avatar
clinthart clinthart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c.schulz
I just cant believe all the positive feed back on this!!!!!!!! As part of the CZ6 camaro design team, THANK YOU ALL!!!!
There is quite the story that goes with this car design.Let me just say in short that we were asked to do the impposible in a short time frame and we pulled it off.Glad to see the positive comments about GM also.


THANKS AGAIN
Chris
You're welcome. Now build the bloody thing so I can see it in my driveway!

Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 01-10-2006, 09:06 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Came across another Photoshop.... a vert...

__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 01-10-2006, 10:42 AM
clinthart's Avatar
clinthart clinthart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockdogz
The Z06 flagship engine? I don't see how they would allow that... don't get me wrong, I would be all over that but I think the chances of that are slim to none.
By the time the Camaro comes out in '09 - '10, the LS7 will no longer be the Z06 flagship engine. The LS7 is a possible power plant.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 01-10-2006, 11:08 AM
camaro_kyle camaro_kyle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

That vert photoshop looks an awful lot like a new Mustang vert. If they do make a convertible, I hope it doesn't look like that.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 01-10-2006, 12:14 PM
rockdogz's Avatar
rockdogz rockdogz is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 655
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
By the time the Camaro comes out in '09 - '10, the LS7 will no longer be the Z06 flagship engine. The LS7 is a possible power plant.
Great point, I guess I was thinking about the current engine lineup...as if the new Camaro would come out tomorrow or something...
__________________
-Tom

camarorestoration.com
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 01-10-2006, 12:17 PM
T Bell T Bell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Love it. Love it. Love it. And I'm an Oldsmobile guy.
__________________
1972 Nova 355, 4 spd, rusty but something to drive.
1972 Pro-touring Cutlass S in the works....still
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 01-10-2006, 01:56 PM
srh3trinity srh3trinity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 596
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I like it, I sure do hope the General sends a few to some of the aftermarket companies (if it goes into production) so that they can start making accessories and performance upgrades available the same time the car comes out. If I am not mistaken Ford did that with the newest iteration of the Mustang. This car should make a nice graduation present for myself.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 01-10-2006, 02:20 PM
markss28 markss28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TX.
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I am going to get one even if my wife needs to get 3 jobs I am going to get one.

They have to make with more power then the ls2 comes with now. I think something like 425-450hp and weighing under 3500lbs would be the way to go. The GTO has a strong motor but weighs a bit much and considering the 06 Vette weighs around 3100lbs I am sure GM can get it to the 3500lb weight or less.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 01-11-2006, 12:37 PM
LIL QIK LIL QIK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well........I have to say that I don't like it. I was really hoping for something that looked closer to the original's.....when I look at that car........I don't see Camaro.........and not sure I would know that's what it suppose to be without someone telling me.

I like the interior and the LS2 option.....but the exterior just doesn't do it for me. The front end looks like a 2004 or so Impala.....the headlights kinda look Cadillac-ish......

I was really hoping for the nice round headlights.....the original style tail lights.......and a trunk. What's up with not having the trunk in a Camaro. Anyway........maybe it'll grow on me.........But I don't see me buying one.

I hate to say it.....But Ford hit it right on the head when they built the Mustang. I would never guess that was a Camaro if it was driving past me.
__________________
1968 Camaro SS
Twin Turbo 383
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 01-11-2006, 01:10 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

All the following IMHO, no strong debate or anything…

I liked it right off. Especially now that I’ve been able to see it with people standing next to it, to be able to see how it scales out. To me, It’s bigger than it had looked to be in the early photos. There is definitely a styling edict at work within GM to create “family resemblance” with Corvette (same lead designer). I think the front of the car looks really menacing.

I think it is about as retro as can be and still be “new” enough to appeal to people that are younger than ~40. The roofline and qtr windows, doors, quarters have enough strong first-gen cues for me… The dash too I think strikes a neat balance. I personally don’t want a verbatim re-creation of 1969.

I’m still on the fence with the taillights but I do like the “sunken-in” depth that you can see within the housings themselves, maybe the outline shape could be tweaked some.

I think that, If you go TOO retro with a design, then, after a few years…what do you do next? except…probably kill it altogether.


The new car has to be able to stand on its own and have its own styling evolution path to follow. I think that from what we see in the new car, GM is thinking this way and there is a plan for the car to have some longevity as an evolving design.

I think we also can’t expect to have the same kind of big collective gasp and overwhelming positive reaction that the current Mustang had when it was first shown. Ford was the first in the "nuvo-retro" game and that whole idea was a brand new concept to everyone then, and everyone was so hungry for ANYTHING new and fresh. Now retro is all over the place, and neat designs in general (retro or not) are popping up everywhere.

Also in terms of reaction (esp on the msg boards) a new Camaro (since it went AWAY, unlike Mustang) has been fretted over / debated / anticipated / discussed ad NAUSEUM, for the last 3 years or so, and so there will be no shortage of critics just posting their brains out about it on the net. I think that “negative nellies”, on any subject, any message board (except lat-g!), tend to out-post positive or moderate people by a significant margin.

I’m much more interested to hear what Mr. and Mrs. Joe Average have to say when they see one pass them by as they are walking down main street USA having never seen one before.

I think that FBody sales tumbled mostly because of a lack of practicality. Most people were not willing to live with one as an “only vehicle”. The same problem very nearly killed Corvette before C5, because you couldn’t fit a set of golf clubs into the back of a C4, and that has been rectified with C5 forward.

Anyway, people just couldn’t live with those Gen3/Gen4 back seats. Four office workers can’t go out to lunch in a 3rd or 4th gen, without there being a lot of bitching going on. New mustang has a usable back seat and decent headroom, sales guy here has a GT and I’ve ridden in the back and it’s a complete non-issue. From the looks of Camaro it will be a similar configuration back there.

Hopefully they also will do a good job with the V6 version of the car which will be the volume sales leader esp in fleet and thus extremely important to the bottom line for Camaro. The Mustang V6 is just a great entry-level car and is a screaming bargain with 200 or so HP.

It’s rear wheel drive, LSx powered, it’s actually called a Camaro, and hopefully will be affordable enough to get the aftermarket spooled up in a big way. That alone is enough to make me rejoice! J

Again, just my $.02. I think it will do well, we’ll see!




__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310

Last edited by rwhite692; 01-11-2006 at 01:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net