...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2015, 08:57 AM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 10,568
Thanks: 2,933
Thanked 2,723 Times in 1,629 Posts
Default 427 cid 800hp n/a LT-5 build

Saw it here...

http://www.zr1.net/forum/showthread.php?t=24966
__________________
The artist formerly known as ‘cosmo mentis’…

Skip
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2015, 10:28 AM
DavidBoren DavidBoren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 191
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thanks for sharing that.

Those Corvette Lotus engines are neat. I like how the guy building it said that it costs "cubic dollars" to upgrade an LT-5.

Did the LT-5 have a flat plane crank? I don't think it did, but I'm not sure.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2015, 11:21 AM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 10,568
Thanks: 2,933
Thanked 2,723 Times in 1,629 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidBoren View Post
Thanks for sharing that.

Those Corvette Lotus engines are neat. I like how the guy building it said that it costs "cubic dollars" to upgrade an LT-5.

Did the LT-5 have a flat plane crank? I don't think it did, but I'm not sure.
David,

Although it wasn't a flat plane crank, there was a racing LT-5 or 2 that was built with a flat plane crank. Might have been 5.0L versions.
__________________
The artist formerly known as ‘cosmo mentis’…

Skip
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2015, 05:36 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

You know I love it Skipper!
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2015, 08:08 PM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 10,568
Thanks: 2,933
Thanked 2,723 Times in 1,629 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
You know I love it Skipper!
800 hp n/a SB2's and LT-5's...I guess that could give those FE guys something to dream about.




lol
__________________
The artist formerly known as ‘cosmo mentis’…

Skip
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2015, 09:30 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,464
Thanks: 966
Thanked 699 Times in 545 Posts
Default

That's amazing! I had no idea you could build an LT5 to that power level.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-30-2015, 10:54 PM
fleetus macmullitz's Avatar
fleetus macmullitz fleetus macmullitz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: On Lake Ontario in NY
Posts: 10,568
Thanks: 2,933
Thanked 2,723 Times in 1,629 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix View Post
That's amazing! I had no idea you could build an LT5 to that power level.
Plus they look amazing too, especially with the siamesed plenum mod.
Attached Images
 
__________________
The artist formerly known as ‘cosmo mentis’…

Skip
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2015, 03:32 AM
Solid LT1 Solid LT1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Those motors weight about the same as a cast iron big block....wouldn't touch one with a 10ft pole....starter motor is under the intake manifold....British engineering at its finest!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-05-2015, 04:07 PM
DavidBoren DavidBoren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 191
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I am just a huge proponent of having overhead valves with one cam to rule them all. That's just personal preference, though.

I do find it quite funny that the LT-5 is what GM produced in the 90's when they decided to see what overhead cams had to offer. And it made 400hp back in 1993-ish. It took Ford until 2011 to make a 400hp dohc naturally aspirated motor.

I am glad that GM stuck the cam back in the block where it belongs... I think that the choice to build the LS motors versus pursuing the dohc design has more than proven to be the right move.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-20-2015, 01:11 PM
uxojerry uxojerry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The LT5 was built mostly by Mercury Marine and is viewed by many as an outstanding design. Gm couldn't machine the parts to the tolerances required and farmed the work out to Mercury. It was discontinued because of cost and not because it was flawed. Same story with the Northstar, 32 valve V8 built by Cadillac. Great engines but discontinued due to cost.

I like 2 valve motors because they are small, powerful engines and look good on an engine stand. I almost put one in my living room, lol. Take a look at a Coyote on an engine stand, it is big, top heavy, and ugly. The Coyote does sound great when it's having the snot wrung out of it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net