...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2012, 10:21 AM
64pontiac 64pontiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 631
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Do all TCP/Alston Products Have Issues??????

Ok guys, I am generally a pretty easy going guy, and we deal with ALL kinds of suspension components at HPI, including designing some of our own, so I am no stranger to how things "should" go......... but lately I have to find out if this is just my bad luck or am I not alone???

We have recently installed several Chris Alston and Total Control products, on chevys and fords, and I am NOT impressed. I am not trying to p*ss off Alston, or slam anyone elses product, especially a company that has been around the block a few times, but I can't understand this:

Attempt #1) Customer brought in a Chevelle project (can be seen in Race Cars section) with an Alston rear clip and suspension package that he bought. The rear frame was WAY out of square (over 3/4 inch over a length of only 4 feet) and the crossbars were all over 4 degrees off. Also, the mandrel bent rails differed at EACH bend by over 2 degrees. Not ever using their product, I phoned them to ask if it was maybe dropped off the truck or something..... immediate response was "our rear clips are not jig welded".
So we cut up their rear clip and re welded it. While doing this, we found out that the front crossbar/driveshaft loop was 2 inches off center, way more than required if you centered your housing and left the pinion off center. Cut/Weld required.

We are a small shop and we jig everything!! So this kind of scared me...... then we found out that their upper shock tabs were not welded on wide enough for the ALSTON coil overs. cut/weld required. Then the four link bar rod ends were too wide for the front 4 link mounts that were welded to the chassis, but only on one side. Ok back to no jig-welding! Cut/weld required.

Once we were ready to jig up the rear housing in the wheelbase we needed, we tried to adjust the 4 link bars. The threads inside were messed up, had two threads criss crossing. Most guys don't have a 1.25 fine thread tap or a lathe that they can chuck up the bars in...... so re-thread required, as well as cutting down the bars.

The customer was pretty upset with the added costs....so we wrote some supporting documents and pics for him, and Alston did NOTHING. In the end, he was just asking for a free door bar swingout kit (200 bucks) to cover some of his costs, but they wouldn't give it!

I won't even get into the cage kit........

OK.

Attempt #2) 67 mustang fastback, customer wanted TCP front coilover system and rear 4 link. I was going to build the customer a rear 4 link, but he went and ordered this behind my back, so we got married to it...... The front control arms weren't bad, but I would never use spherical rod ends on a street front suspension again ever. We had an issue with one of the ball joints, it was cut right out of the box. Turns out they are mopar ball joints......... anyways! Lots of the usual, re drill and enlarge holes because this and that doesn't fit blah blah..... not bad though.

The rear suspension install was not as fun. Their upper tubular mount, although solid in design, had two flaws. One, it did not fit the factory frame rails tightly, requiring 1/2 inch of plate to take up the gap so we could weld it. Also, the way they designed it, you bolt in the bar (great for the restomod crew right? easily reversible?) but then the frame plates get welded, and guess what, they capture the bar, never to be removed again! So your out of luck if you want to disassemble, paint, coat etc after mockup. So we had to modify the rear cradle to be removable, something that could easily be done by alston.

The subframe connector/brace kit is not very exhaust friendly, but we are pretty good with our exhaust fab and came up with a nice system up to the rear end. Then it hit me like a slap to the face...... you cannot run exhaust over the diff through their suspension. not possible. No way. Period. Partly my fault for not doing it sooner, but you know how it goes building a car on someone elses deadline...... not always the order you would like! So I do some digging...... and even the Ring Brothers had to go under the diff with the exhaust. Ok so I'm not on crack, my eyesight is correct. Well with that low of a ride height, I am not a fan of this at all.

On to the motor mounts...... we had their small block ford motor mounts that are supposed to work with a T5.... oh yeah but not if you want to use a t5 bellhousing. That would be unheard of! So we had to re-do the mounts and laser cut different plates that lower the motor.

To me it just seems like there was not alot of forethough put into this system, and every time I have called for a tech tip or to ask questions about issues we are having, I get the cold shoulder.

Now I am really questioning if I ever want an attempt #3..... so I am asking if this is just my bad luck or are some of their products pretty decent? I tend to stick with a few brands of every product, so I really don't want to add them to my distributor list, but sometimes a customer requests specific product........

Any feedback?
__________________
Tyler
HPI Customs
Manitoba, Canada
www.hpicustoms.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2012, 12:45 PM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Tyler,

I have used the TCP pieces a few of my cars.

I used their complete manual rack, it bolted in very nice and need a few mods to make it great. The taper tie rod adapter piece was not a great design, so I reamed the spindle for a perfect fit 1/2" bolt. A couple other things that needed small mods. I also wish the rack system was lighter and I see some areas for improvement.

I am using the k-strut swivel on my falcon to make the sytem a bolt in. I will be removing that and using a rod end. I have rod ends on all my suspension attach points on that car. I am using the kevlar/teflon lined chromoly rod ends and they are great. I have no issues with street driving or autocross.

The 4-link I did for my 65 mustang uses the g-bar cradle but I did modify every attach point to the chassis. I designed it so that it would bolt in, I am working on an original k-model mustang. the brackets completly sup the frame for excellent structural integrity. I also put in a chassis mounted sway bar and made all my own links using the chormoly rod ends.

I understand where you are coming from. I never buy anything that works out of the box.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2012, 01:39 PM
64pontiac 64pontiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 631
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ya I was just curious....... all you ever see in the mustang magazines is TCP TCP TCP TCP and yet there are others out there! I don't know I just wanted to rant I guess!

But for anyone looking to use the rear stuff from TCP, Consider all avenues.....

I have not used one but would love to hear about RRS for mustangs......

On another note we are currently doing a 65 fastback that we are adapting a Speedtech Torque arm too, so when I start posting that you can critique me Bryce!!
__________________
Tyler
HPI Customs
Manitoba, Canada
www.hpicustoms.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:21 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Don't forget the Alston G-link ride height issues on 1st gen Camaro's. Few guys including myself have had to install a shorter spring to acheive a more desired ride height. And also the rear frame rails cracking with this and similar older style G-bar/Air bar. This happened in 3 cars on this site that I know of.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:40 PM
GrabberGT's Avatar
GrabberGT GrabberGT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I had 2 bad ball joints right out of the box on my front coilover kit.
__________________
Chris

Its not a Vega!!!!

Total Cost Involved - Total Control Products - Gateway Performance - Fatman - MaverickMan Carbon
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:42 PM
64pontiac 64pontiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 631
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I am starting to feel bad for even starting this thread!

But I am getting the answer I kind of wanted.....
__________________
Tyler
HPI Customs
Manitoba, Canada
www.hpicustoms.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2012, 03:03 PM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 64pontiac View Post
On another note we are currently doing a 65 fastback that we are adapting a Speedtech Torque arm too, so when I start posting that you can critique me Bryce!!
Anytime Bud!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2012, 03:21 PM
ErikLS2's Avatar
ErikLS2 ErikLS2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 462
Thanks: 10
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 64pontiac View Post
I am starting to feel bad for even starting this thread!

But I am getting the answer I kind of wanted.....
I wouldn't feel bad at all, this kind of information is one of the reasons I frequent this board.
__________________
Erik

69 Camaro
Several other things with wheels and engines

https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=27133
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2012, 03:26 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 214 Times in 120 Posts
Default

My Varishocks have been good to me so far. There are clearly different classes of parts in the aftermarket. From R&D, engineering, and materials.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2012, 04:14 PM
64pontiac 64pontiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 631
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I hear ya on the different classes, you realize pretty quick that almost nothing is ever bolt in despite what anyone says (for the most part)

Definately no stranger to the aftermarket, but I just thought maybe I got the lemon stuff.........
__________________
Tyler
HPI Customs
Manitoba, Canada
www.hpicustoms.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net