Mark Stielow transmission cross member.

[Tim john---]

Can someone post a clear photo of the transmission cross member under one of Marks Camaro's. I like the way it mounts and offers nice exhaust routing options. There was a picture or two at one point on the forum but I am unsuccessful finding them again. Thank You. Tim john--- PM is fine as well.

[clill]

...........

[Tim john---]

Thank You very much, not the ones I remember but the same idea. I seem to recall a "channel" iron across supporting the transmission verses round tubing on this one. May have been one of his other cars. This helps me get started and I thank you for posting them. Tim john---

[SlowProgress]

I like this style also and plan on doing a version for my car. There are some good photos on the DSE site that show how the doublers are done on the inside.

http://www.detroitspeed.com/Projects...dee1969184.jpg

Also I really like the one the Dutchboys did.

http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o...psg7rgpzwe.jpg

https://lateral-g.net/forums/atta...1&d=1435562511

[TheJDMan]

The problem I see with that style cross member is that the weight of the transmission is supported by the thin sheet metal floor pan and not the more substantial sub frame rails. While it does provide for more exhaust clearance under the floor, it also is more prone to flexing and possible floor pan sagging. On the other hand a conventional cross member ties all three mount points of the engine/trans assembly into the sub frame creating one complete assembly. It just seems to me that you give up some rigidity by not tying the cross member to the sub frame. Just sayin.

[71RS/SS396]

Originally Posted by TheJDMan

The problem I see with that style cross member is that the weight of the transmission is supported by the thin sheet metal floor pan and not the more substantial sub frame rails. While it does provide for more exhaust clearance under the floor, it also is more prone to flexing and possible floor pan sagging. On the other hand a conventional cross member ties all three mount points of the engine/trans assembly into the sub frame creating one complete assembly. It just seems to me that you give up some rigidity by not tying the cross member to the sub frame. Just sayin.

Steve, I'm willing to bet it's tied into the rocker panels which will provide plenty of support and strength. DSE did mine in a similar fashion with tubing running the entire width of the car tied into the rockers. It's had 760 hp going through it with no problem.