...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2016, 01:59 PM
Bill71 Bill71 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Help with Oversteer

I need some help adjusting my suspension. I have a 1971 Camaro with a full cage, LS7, T56, Speedway 9" with Speedtech Torque Arm rear. The front has 700# springs, Viking double adjust shocks, GW uppers, Hotchkis hollow bar. The rear has Ridetech single adjust coilvers. I use my car on road courses exclusively, no autocross. Tires are NT01 with 275/35-18 front and 315/30-18 rear. I have been running the car since January and have had a bit of understeer from the beginning. I have always had a bit of tire rub in the back so I changed out the 225# rear springs to 300#. i had the car on a local track last Saturday and had zero tire rub but the car was noticeably tail-happy, at one point causing so much oversteer that I put all 4 wheel in the dirt. When I changed the springs I also raised the rear about an inch at that time. I am thinking that I can lower the rear ride height and maybe add rear tire pressure and soften the shock adjustment to help with this. Am I on the right track?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2016, 08:13 PM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 288
Thanks: 155
Thanked 103 Times in 62 Posts
Default

I should let this for the more experienced, but refer to Ron Suttons sticky on overall handling in this section. #12 "more spring = less grip". This is exactly what happened when spring rate was increased. Also increasing tire pressure acts like increasing spring rate, effectively compounding your issue. Let's hope some others can chime in to tell you what you should do, because there are a lot of people with great experience on this forum.
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-19-2016, 08:26 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I would say less spring rate and a dual adjustable shock. An inch of ride height change is HUGE. Corner weight the car when you reduce the spring rate. Make sure you have that rear shock close to mid stroke. Otherwise you take the risk of bottoming out the shock in compression or extension. Either way, no bueno.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-19-2016, 08:31 PM
Z06vette's Avatar
Z06vette Z06vette is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I have found this to be true as well. My car tends to push on the autocross. The more I dial up the rear shock setting, the better the car turns. Softening the setting creates more push. I also dont like the mismatched types & brands of shocks. But I have no business making suggestions, as I am no expert by any means. Just relaying my experiences. Why not put the softer springs back in and just raise the rear ride height to help with tire rub? Where is it rubbing? Can you roll the lip? Or maybe a 250lb spring is the sweet spot for you?
__________________
69 RS LS3/T56
68 firebird vert LS1/4L60E
67 RS LS2/T56
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-19-2016, 09:32 PM
Bill71 Bill71 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I will look for Ron's suspension post. Regarding air pressure I actually lowered it in relation to the front. I have different brands of shocks because I bought the Speedtech parts first then the Viking shocks became available later. The tire rubs mostly on the inside of the rear wheel wels as I did not mini tub the car. The 300# springs definitely helped that problem and the new handling characteristics do make the car change direction faster. I just want to dial it back a bit if I can do it without buying another set of springs. I will probably start with lowering the rear a bit and it sounds like softening the shock setting is going in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-19-2016, 10:10 PM
Rod P's Avatar
Rod P Rod P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 977
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

its tough to give proper spring recommendations without corner and vehicle weights....but i also dont like mixing the shocks, the two have different compression and rebound curves, not to mention that the Viking is a digressive piston twin tube double adjustable shock, and the ridetech shock is a linear piston mono tube rebound adjust only shock (unless it is brand new then it might be the new digressive piston ones) so they react completely different as the flow thru the shock oil

there is so much that needs to be discussed before a base can setup can be designed
__________________
Rod Prouty
My websiteAuto-cross 101
I'm not a Real Racer but I did spend a night in the Pozzi's motor-home
Bangshift Stories
I’m not the smartest guy at the track … but when he goes home … I’m still there testing, tuning, learning & getting faster.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-21-2016, 11:20 AM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod P View Post
its tough to give proper spring recommendations without corner and vehicle weights....but i also dont like mixing the shocks, the two have different compression and rebound curves, not to mention that the Viking is a digressive piston twin tube double adjustable shock, and the ridetech shock is a linear piston mono tube rebound adjust only shock (unless it is brand new then it might be the new digressive piston ones) so they react completely different as the flow thru the shock oil

there is so much that needs to be discussed before a base can setup can be designed


I "think" the only Ridetech singles with digressive pistons & valving are the ones they do for me. But maybe someone else is having them do some for them too.



.
__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-21-2016, 11:23 AM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill71 View Post
I need some help adjusting my suspension. I have a 1971 Camaro with a full cage, LS7, T56, Speedway 9" with Speedtech Torque Arm rear. The front has 700# springs, Viking double adjust shocks, GW uppers, Hotchkis hollow bar. The rear has Ridetech single adjust coilvers. I use my car on road courses exclusively, no autocross. Tires are NT01 with 275/35-18 front and 315/30-18 rear. I have been running the car since January and have had a bit of understeer from the beginning. I have always had a bit of tire rub in the back so I changed out the 225# rear springs to 300#. i had the car on a local track last Saturday and had zero tire rub but the car was noticeably tail-happy, at one point causing so much oversteer that I put all 4 wheel in the dirt. When I changed the springs I also raised the rear about an inch at that time. I am thinking that I can lower the rear ride height and maybe add rear tire pressure and soften the shock adjustment to help with this. Am I on the right track?

Like others have said, raising the rear an inch is a HUGE change.

Lower the car back down & run it. If you find you still need more rear grip, lower the rear panhard some. If it is too tight again, you can raise the rear a little, or raise the rear panhard bar ... or both.

__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-22-2016, 10:15 AM
Bill71 Bill71 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I need to correct what I originally wrote. I probably raised the rear about 1/2 inch. I will lower it just the same. Ron, the panhard bar is already at it's lowest position.The Ridetech shocks are single adjustable in both rebound and compression according to Speedtech's website. If it is possible to answer this question, would it be worthwhile to just bite the bullet and get Viking shocks for the rear? I do not want to drop another $150 for another set of springs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-22-2016, 08:08 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill71 View Post
I need to correct what I originally wrote. I probably raised the rear about 1/2 inch. I will lower it just the same. Ron, the panhard bar is already at it's lowest position.The Ridetech shocks are single adjustable in both rebound and compression according to Speedtech's website. If it is possible to answer this question, would it be worthwhile to just bite the bullet and get Viking shocks for the rear? I do not want to drop another $150 for another set of springs.
Perfect. Lower the car back 1/2" & run it. If you still need more rear grip we can explore other options.

I'm trying my best to not sound like a smart ass. I really am. But why would you want to change from Ridetech shocks to V....

Never mind. Changing from a monotube shock like the Ridetech to a twin tube shock like the Viking would be a disadvantage. So don't do that.


__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net