...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2007, 10:28 AM
Musclerodz's Avatar
Musclerodz Musclerodz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: washington, ok
Posts: 4,286
Thanks: 22
Thanked 164 Times in 95 Posts
Default How do you know when the market is saturated....

with 67-69 Camaro aftermarket subframes? When you open up the new Super Chevy and nearly every large suspension advertiser has a different one for sale. March '07 has one from Heidt's, Chris Alston's, Total Cost Involved, Fat Man Fabrications, and DSE. The does not include Art Morrison (had an ad but not for their new sub), 21st Century Street Machines, and one or two others I am probably missing. This is not a who's better thread, but an observation that I hope there is plenty of market to go around for everyone. That is 7 plus manufacturers of the same product.
__________________
Mike Redpath
Musclerodz & Customz
facebook page
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2007, 10:53 AM
Stuart Adams Stuart Adams is offline
Lateral-g Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,046
Thanks: 19
Thanked 62 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Pro Touring alive and well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-24-2007, 01:55 PM
Silver69Camaro Silver69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart Adams
Pro Touring alive and well.
Exactly. Think about how many companies make headers for '67-'69 Camaros...but each one is different.
__________________
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-24-2007, 01:59 PM
slownova slownova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i wish the fact that there is 8 people with the same product would drive the price down a little.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-24-2007, 02:04 PM
MaxHarvard's Avatar
MaxHarvard MaxHarvard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hugo, Minnesota
Posts: 2,001
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart Adams
Pro Touring alive and well.

Here here!!

Pro-touring is a such a blast.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-24-2007, 06:35 PM
frankenstang frankenstang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 235
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You forgot to mention Jeff Schwartz. I think his is the best design, but I'm really biased! I agree on the saturation/cost issue. The sheer amount of 1st gen Camaros being built doesn't seem to bring the total cost of the car down.
__________________
check out pics of the car at www.fquick.com/frankenstang
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-24-2007, 10:32 PM
FreddieCougar's Avatar
FreddieCougar FreddieCougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 235
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slownova
i wish the fact that there is 8 people with the same product would drive the price down a little.
Ultimately, that is the best indicator that the market is saturated. When it gets to that point, nobody can sell on their features (because all 87 people manufacturing said part share some feature or another) and all that is left is price.
Then comes the cost cutting, degradation of quality, and the downward death spiral. Happens in the automotive aftermarket all the time....I sincerely hope that it doesn't happen in such a specialized marketplace, considering I just entered into it!
Tim
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2007, 12:55 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankenstang
You forgot to mention Jeff Schwartz. I think his is the best design, but I'm really biased! I agree on the saturation/cost issue. The sheer amount of 1st gen Camaros being built doesn't seem to bring the total cost of the car down.

Has Jeff made hes own too? That must be quality piece!! I need to take a look at hes pages.
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2007, 01:54 AM
71Nova 71Nova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

True, and I know this was not meant to be a which one is better tread, but I wouldn't want half of them.
__________________
David
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-25-2007, 04:32 AM
Mean 69 Mean 69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 375
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Actually, it's an indicator that the market is thriving, but it is a good point that it will attract some folks that are looking to steal market share away based on pricing, which will virtually always fall into the " I wouldn't own half of them" comment from 71 Nova, I agree completely. The hard part is for the lay-person to decipher which ones are actually "real," and which ones are hype and should be avoided.

Another good indicator? AME's introduction of their setup. Art and folks are pretty smart, and very business savy, I'd surmize that they wouldn't invest the effort into developing a setup if they didn't have supreme confidence that it would sell like hotcakes (and IMHO, looks to be the best performance and value setup out there so far).

Of course, you can't forget the goodies associated with making the stock frames perform exceedingly better than they came from the factory either, like the really bitchin ATS setup. Here again though, look at the number of tubular control arms out there!!! Are they all the same? Not hardly, but I'd guess that there are a large number of folks that open the Super Chevy magazine and buy on pricing alone, while others are looking for a specific benefit.

What's it mean? In my opinion, the phrase "you get what you pay for" only applies to a market where there is sufficient competition. That's the reason that a Sonny Bryant billet crankshaft will set you back $2k or more, and a Scat cast crank that serves the same purpose is $300 (or whatever they go for). It's a good thing because there are customers for both. It's a bad thing, however, when folks are led to believe that a $300 cast crank is the same as a $2k billet unit.

M
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net