...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2011, 06:45 PM
R0LLDAMTIDE R0LLDAMTIDE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default room for a 335?

i have a minitubbed 68 camaro that i am going to try to run 335s on. to the guys that run them now, how much room do you call enough? its purely a street car, driven maybe 2500 miles a year..... it has a g-link and a 9", new quarters with lip not rolled.... yet!! just trying to see what you all would be comfortable with.... thanks alot
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-05-2011, 07:05 AM
MarkM66's Avatar
MarkM66 MarkM66 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Here's some info that may help.

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...highlight=1968
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2011, 07:01 PM
SS454 SS454 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chelsea, AL
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've got a 70 Chevelle mini tubbed with 345's. I have 3/4" to the frame and less than 3/8" to the fender lip. No rubbing issues at all.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2011, 06:41 PM
TheJDMan's Avatar
TheJDMan TheJDMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 690
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
Default

I have a 9", G-link, mini-tubs and 18x12 335's . The rear end width is 57" WMS to WMS (wheel mount surface). I have about 1" of clearance inboard. The fenders are not rolled yet but they will need to be before driving. Here are a couple of pics so you can kinda see where the tires set in retation to the fender.



__________________
Steve Hayes
"Dust Off"
68 Camaro
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you!
"Jeremy Clarkson"

Last edited by TheJDMan; 11-09-2011 at 06:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2011, 10:50 PM
DEIGuy38's Avatar
DEIGuy38 DEIGuy38 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Don't mean to hijack the thread. JD man did you have any issues with getting the rear to that ride height with the g-link? I've seen a couple post where guys can't get to the ride height they want. I really like where your is setting.

Guy
__________________
Guy

68 Camaro, LS1 T56, DSE Speed Kit 2, DSE Quadralink, DSE Mini Tub, Forgelines, Vintage Air, Dakota Digital, GM Tilt Column, Corbeau Seats
2012 Dodge 3500 4x4 6.7L Diesel CCSB

Last edited by DEIGuy38; 11-09-2011 at 10:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2011, 08:37 AM
6D9 Matt's Avatar
6D9 Matt 6D9 Matt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

DEIGuy - see here:

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...t=33473&page=2
__________________
'69 Camaro
416ci / T56 / 9"
Turbo in the works...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2011, 05:50 PM
R0LLDAMTIDE R0LLDAMTIDE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

thanks everybody! i think if i roll or cut the lip ill be fine. thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-10-2011, 10:19 PM
TheJDMan's Avatar
TheJDMan TheJDMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 690
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DEIGuy38 View Post
Don't mean to hijack the thread. JD man did you have any issues with getting the rear to that ride height with the g-link? I've seen a couple post where guys can't get to the ride height they want. I really like where your is setting.

Guy
The G-link came with 12-200 springs. I could not get the rear down with those springs. I installed a pair of 10-200 springs which gave me enough adjustment to lower the car to the current ride height. Everything else on the G-Link works well with the 10" springs.
__________________
Steve Hayes
"Dust Off"
68 Camaro
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you!
"Jeremy Clarkson"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-11-2011, 10:57 AM
6D9 Matt's Avatar
6D9 Matt 6D9 Matt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

So just replacing those springs and you have no issues whatsoever? Ride quality still good? No issues with anything hitting the trunk floor, etc?
__________________
'69 Camaro
416ci / T56 / 9"
Turbo in the works...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-11-2011, 08:35 PM
TheJDMan's Avatar
TheJDMan TheJDMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 690
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6D9 Matt View Post
So just replacing those springs and you have no issues whatsoever? Ride quality still good? No issues with anything hitting the trunk floor, etc?
The car is not operational yet so I cannot speak to the ride quality. I can say that the 10" spring gave me some adjustability and there is still at least 2" of additional travel before the suspension bottoms out.
__________________
Steve Hayes
"Dust Off"
68 Camaro
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you!
"Jeremy Clarkson"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net