...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Vendor Specific Technical Discussions and Support > Roadster Shop Chassis and Components
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2011, 02:28 PM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Very nice looking stuff. IS that a 9" ford center section?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2011, 02:50 PM
Ron in SoCal's Avatar
Ron in SoCal Ron in SoCal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,044
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Man that is slick! Any info on hp ratings?
__________________
Ron in SoCal
69 Camaro in progress
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=31246

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2011, 03:16 PM
67ragtp 67ragtp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Most impressive! Have you guys done some testing, Test car? WOW! Beautiful work, I got to have one for my 65 gto project.

Rich
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2011, 03:48 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fbm37 View Post
wow that is truly amazing and looks incredible ....I guess we will have to have one of those next...
Its not too late to put one under that Mustang!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce View Post
Very nice looking stuff. IS that a 9" ford center section?
Yes, it is an aluminum 9" Ford center, C6 Vette Spindles, fabricated control arms.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron in SoCal View Post
Man that is slick! Any info on hp ratings?
We are going to offer 3 configurations based on the axles and CV rating. 600 HP, 1,000 HP, and 1,400 HP. Ford 9" center sections can be built accordingly. The stub axles are 31 spline or 35 spline. There are not a lot of options currently for the 35 spline in a street application, but several companies are developing a tru-trac type posi for a 35 spline axle that should be out by the end of summer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67ragtp View Post
Most impressive! Have you guys done some testing, Test car? WOW! Beautiful work, I got to have one for my 65 gto project.

Rich
We have not done any real world testing just yet, but have spent a solid 6 months of time on the computer going through suspension analyzing software. Two of the first production units are currently going under test cars that will be on the road very shortly. We are installing a chassis under a 66 Chevelle for a customer, and building a test car for ourselves. We currently have the IRS in both 64-67 and 68-72 Chevelle (and GTO) chassis as well as 1st and 2nd gen Camaro Chassis, and Challenger/Cuda Chassis. Mustang chassis are next on our drawing board to incorporate the IRS into.
__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2011, 06:41 PM
67ragtp 67ragtp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

What are thoughts on exhaust/tail pipe routing? Dumps? Is there enough room under the center section?

Thanks Rich
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2011, 07:08 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67ragtp View Post
What are thoughts on exhaust/tail pipe routing? Dumps? Is there enough room under the center section?

Thanks Rich
Rich,
The crossmember has two recesses in it to allow for 3" exhaust to pass above the axle. There are holes there for an exhaust mount that we are going to offer as an option. We are going to be starting on the exhaust for chris's 66 chevelle in the project section. I'll get a few pics posted as we get there.


__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-08-2011, 08:16 PM
Autokraft's Avatar
Autokraft Autokraft is offline
Supporting Vendor

Autokraft.org

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eau Claire,Wi
Posts: 874
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

What is the track width on the rear? Looks awesome
__________________
Autokraft
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-09-2011, 01:46 AM
96z28ss's Avatar
96z28ss 96z28ss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 2,024
Thanks: 18
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default

This is a really cool way to get IRS in side a muscle car.
Tim Bruning has done a similar set up before at SAR. SAR used more GM Facotry components. There hasn't been any true hard testing of the system. Show car type stuff.
Lets get some real world testing!!


__________________
1969 Camaro LS2/T56 D1SC
www.automotivedesigneng.com
Special thanks to: DPE Wheel / Columbia Parts Company / US Collision / T. Bruning

Last edited by 96z28ss; 05-09-2011 at 01:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-09-2011, 09:16 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 96z28ss View Post
This is a really cool way to get IRS in side a muscle car.
Tim Bruning has done a similar set up before at SAR. SAR used more GM Facotry components. There hasn't been any true hard testing of the system. Show car type stuff.
Lets get some real world testing!!
We are working to have Chris's 66 out for the Motor State Event with the IRS and we will have a 2nd gen of our own shortly behind that.

SAR definitely does some top notch stuff. We looked at the stock C6 components and saw a lot of room for improvement. By building our own conrtol arms and cradle system we were to make several improvements over a stock C6 IRS.

We have increased camber gains in roll compared to stock C6. There is 1 degree of negative camber gain through 1" of compression. This makes sure your tires never gain positive camber (like a stock C6) during cornering, losing traction/grip.

We were able to closely match camber gains to that of our front suspension which will yield a much more balanced and predictable car

Upper and lower control arm mounting points are pitched to give your vehicle 55% anti-squat, NO OTHER IRS OFFERS THIS, (Anti-squat will make your tires plant harder to the ground to help with acceleration and traction out of corners and from a launch)

We were also able to stand up the coilovers drastically over what is possible on a stock C6 arm giving more desirable a motion ratio.

Our upper control arms are also easily adjustable so caster/camber can be adjusted with shims while at the track.
__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-09-2011, 09:00 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autokraft View Post
What is the track width on the rear? Looks awesome
Thanks, the track width is 58.75" which will end up at 59" with brakes. We had a lot of discussion about track widths and possibly going narrower to get a deeper lip on the rear wheels, but decided on maintaining the optimal geometry and performance rather than sacrifice that for looks of the rear wheel. We designed it to be considerably narrower than a stock C6 Vette IRS. Depending on the car, you should be in the 6" - 9" back space range on a 12" wheel.
__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net