...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-02-2007, 11:48 AM
DVierstra's Avatar
DVierstra DVierstra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buena Park, CA
Posts: 158
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
I'm kinda diggin' the look of it.

BTW, by the time the Camaro comes out it will already be outdated. I'm already bored with the looks of it after seeing it nonstop for like 3 years now.
I am not bored with the looks myself. I just wish that it would be out already!!
The Mule has often been mistaken for the next RWD Impala due out in 2009.
I believe it will be on a Holden platform, Which the Caprice (only sold everywhere else but the US) is built on the Holden platform and does look similar to the current Impala.
__________________
Vierstra Design- automotive art
"Imagination is more than knowledge" - A. Einstein



Email for DV

vierstradesign.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-02-2007, 12:23 PM
Mecom Racer's Avatar
Mecom Racer Mecom Racer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Bad news is that it appears GM will not be able to engineer it without a B pillar as shown on the concept. I'm beyond disappointed about this seemingly minute detail but it makes a huge difference when you want all the windows down.
__________________
"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." -- Ronald Reagan

http://photobucket.com/albums/v494/M...ort%20Tribute/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-02-2007, 04:03 PM
Ummgawa's Avatar
Ummgawa Ummgawa is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Douglasville, Ga.
Posts: 2,876
Thanks: 94
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Better news for us GM fans:


http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_...02154609990003
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-02-2007, 05:22 PM
BThibodeaux BThibodeaux is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 310
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecom Racer
Bad news is that it appears GM will not be able to engineer it without a B pillar as shown on the concept. I'm beyond disappointed about this seemingly minute detail but it makes a huge difference when you want all the windows down.

So how do you think they will pull off the convertible?

BTW, does anyone know if it has truly been confirmed that convertibles will not be available until 2010?
__________________
Brian T.

2011 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-02-2007, 09:35 PM
andrewmp6 andrewmp6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 641
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i dont understand why bring it back they canned it before for lack of sales and look at the gto it didnt do that good.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-04-2007, 02:15 PM
trapin's Avatar
trapin trapin is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Michigan
Posts: 692
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6
i dont understand why bring it back they canned it before for lack of sales and look at the gto it didnt do that good.
The F-body was canned because we didn't have a new platform to move it to and sales were only lacking because the current architecture had run it's course. It was just in the wrong place at the wrong time when it happened.

GTO failed for obvious reasons. But it's still a great "driving" car. A used one would be a great bargain for the amount of performance.
__________________
Tony Rapin
The Pigeon Forge Project
A 1968 Pro-Touring LS1 Camaro.........and why not?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-04-2007, 02:43 PM
Mecom Racer's Avatar
Mecom Racer Mecom Racer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bartlett, IL
Posts: 255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BThibodeaux
So how do you think they will pull off the convertible?

BTW, does anyone know if it has truly been confirmed that convertibles will not be available until 2010?

There are different government-mandated standards on verts vs. coupes. Insurance premiums and the cost to build them is usually also higher on a vert. Premiums are higher for obvious reasons but GM's cost, hence consumer cost, would be too high to make the coupe meet the crash and rollover standards without a b-pillar. Remember, the Camaro needs to appeal to the younger crowd who needs an affordable car in order for GM to sell enough to make it worthwhile. My guess is that along with a b-pillar, the Camaro doors will not be frameless as on the concept. We get a b-pillar, a rear window that won't open and a fully framed door thanks to the beaurocrats and the tough crash standards.
__________________
"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." -- Ronald Reagan

http://photobucket.com/albums/v494/M...ort%20Tribute/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net