...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2008, 09:29 AM
mosconiac's Avatar
mosconiac mosconiac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Turbo Mufflers?

I thought the following was a joke until I read the thread....
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?t=109338

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2008, 10:17 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hey Jody, I have an idea...
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-13-2008, 05:58 AM
Krushpuppy Krushpuppy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow, i have to give a 10 for imagination but here is my question.

Locating your turbos that far from intake leaves a lot of piping to get that pressurized air through before its providing any umf. Wouldn't this setup increase the effects of turbo lag significantly? and would your boost be lower since the exhaust velocity is a bit slower that far back?

I could see them being good for cooling purposes but it seems you would be trading a lot if it lagged the turbos even more since that's the biggest down side of turbos in the first place.

Im far from an expert but that's what it seems would be the result.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2008, 06:26 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well, I guess it's supposed to function like the STS system. I'm no turbo expert either, but I do know that turbos spool from heat energy. A lot of energy is lost in all that exhaust pipe.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2008, 07:54 AM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Looks like the inside of that car is gonna be toasty warm.
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2008, 07:57 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Safe to say it's probably not going in the riddler winner next year. If it works, and the car is fun to drive, then more power to him.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2008, 10:16 AM
ArisESQ ArisESQ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Gatos
Posts: 765
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krushpuppy View Post
Wow, i have to give a 10 for imagination but here is my question.

Locating your turbos that far from intake leaves a lot of piping to get that pressurized air through before its providing any umf. Wouldn't this setup increase the effects of turbo lag significantly? and would your boost be lower since the exhaust velocity is a bit slower that far back?

I could see them being good for cooling purposes but it seems you would be trading a lot if it lagged the turbos even more since that's the biggest down side of turbos in the first place.

Im far from an expert but that's what it seems would be the result.
I'm also no turbo expert, but I have been in an STS vette and know that it doesn't feel like there is any turbo lag... according to the STS site (which I realize will be a lot of marketing bs), that the longer intake piping actually allows pressure to remain built up so there is less lag.

Tom Nelson would probably be the one to clear this up though, seeing as he's a turbo expert.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-13-2008, 01:12 PM
skatinjay27's Avatar
skatinjay27 skatinjay27 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 1,778
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i have to agree there are quiet a few rear mount turbo cars in town and they are bad azz! thats always a question with rear mounts (lag) everyone i have talked to said its not barley there.
__________________
AJ

1970 1/2 rs z28...pro-touring?...i wish...soon?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2008, 06:33 AM
andrewmp6 andrewmp6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 641
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

That's one pricey rear seat heater.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-11-2010, 08:26 AM
dave281sc dave281sc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
That's one pricey rear seat heater.

Updated thread. You don't have to be a member to view the pictures here:

http://www.modularpowerhouse.com/for...ighlight=turbo

Last edited by dave281sc; 02-11-2010 at 09:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net