...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-21-2008, 10:49 AM
gearhead1186's Avatar
gearhead1186 gearhead1186 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Since its a road course car, the ls7 appeals to me since it has dry sump oiling but Im kinda scared to put too much boost through it. ls2 has a little more meat on it.

Any opinions? 800rwhp is fine with me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-21-2008, 12:52 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb View Post
I don't think you need an aftermarket block at 1000 hp, Kurt (W2W) had no problem with my stock LS2 block at that level. Still doesn't as he's spec'd another for Troy at 800 rwhp with the stock LS2 block, no ERL prep, nada.

My two cents.................

Jody
Yep. I told Kurt I wanted about 800rwhp on pump gas for my new turbo LS2 (that's about 950 crank)...

Kurt spec'd me a STOCK block and a STOCK GM crank.

Kurt said both the factory block and crank will be plenty adequate at this power level, he has used the both reliably above this power level and advised me to save my money or spend it elsewhere.

As you approach 1350 hp / 20 psi of boost or so, a stock 4-bolt LS can start pushing coolant out-- that's where the LSx and 6 bolt heads shine.

Kurt is modifying my LS2 block with piston oil squirters though-- I asked if he could modify the block with squirters and he said yes-- so I said go for it. They are a very good idea for any forced induction build-- nearly all factory FI engines have piston squirters. The new NASCAR blocks have 2 squirters per cylinder. If you're going to track the thing, you absolutely positively want them! Really helps the pistons out and also keeps detonation away by maintaining piston temps.

With 1000fwhp on a track, I hope you are planning on a very large cooling system. Cooling 1000hp in a prolonged sustained use environment is NOT going to be an easy task...
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 11-21-2008 at 05:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-21-2008, 04:38 PM
BBC69Camaro's Avatar
BBC69Camaro BBC69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 572
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blown353 View Post
With 1000fwhp on a track, I hope you are planning on a very large cooling system. Cooling 1000hp in a prolonged sustained use environment is NOT going to be an easy task...
I have always wondered what those guys do for prolonged cooling, especially in a hot climate.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-21-2008, 05:57 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC69Camaro View Post
I have always wondered what those guys do for prolonged cooling, especially in a hot climate.
...and especially forced induction. Keeping forced-induction anything on a road course happy is a challenge. Once heat soak starts setting in you start hurting things, typically from detonation.

A large radiator with ample airflow, large intercooler with ample airflow, large oil cooler with ample airflow, power steering cooler, and a way to exchange enough underhood air to avoid creating a "superheated" underhood enviornment but in such a way to avoid creating too much front end lift are all important. Not to mention shielding all the radiant heat sources in a turbo car so they don't bake all the more fragile bits under the hood when they are glowing orange for an entire track session.

Keeping a naturally aspirated car happy on a roadcourse isn't too bad usually; size the radiator right, size the oil cooler right, put on a good water pump and shield the plug wires and anything else that might melt from the radiated heat from the headers that will be scorching hot for 20-30 minutes straight and go try it. Add boost and you just upped the heat load on the engine & oil cooling system, so you might have to grow those components. You also just increased the amount of radiant heat under the hood, especially if using turbos. And now you have to fit an intercooler in that's large enough such that the intake temps don't heatsoak from prolonged boost-making engine load conditions, and chances are that intercooler is mounted up front and is now raising the temp of the air that flows through the radiator & oil coolers, reducing their efficiency, so you might need to move the intercooler or make the radiator & oil cooler bigger still... it's really fun shaking down a forced induction car for roadcourse duty.

I think we went through 3 radiator / oil cooler / intercooler variations on a friend's Procharged 5.0 track-day beater until it finally made it through a 30 minute track session without overheating something.
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 11-21-2008 at 06:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-21-2008, 11:54 PM
gearhead1186's Avatar
gearhead1186 gearhead1186 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

thanks. great info. just thinking more and more about the car, what Ill use it for, making sure not to get carried away... 700-800 rwhp is more then enough with me.

Im sure an ls7 can be built to that power level breathing on its own. Heck, just for arguments sake, it can always be sprayed a bit for a nice dyno print out.

Heck, worst case scenario, it doesnt take much boost to get an ls7 to 700-800 rwhp. Im sure that wont be AS BAD as some twin turbo car running around the track with glowing headers.

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-22-2008, 08:07 AM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,299
Thanks: 6,989
Thanked 2,141 Times in 983 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gearhead1186 View Post
700-800 rwhp is more then enough with me.

Im sure an ls7 can be built to that power level breathing on its own.
I'm gonna say you'll have a tough time getting a naturally aspirated LS7 to 700-800 rwhp. With some nitrous, yeah. If you prefer track duty over street duty drop the 700-800 rwhp goal and build a solid 500-550 rwhp LS7 combo with the proper coolers for oil, ps, etc. and go have a blast. It will be a much better car on the track, easier to drive, easier on parts, and likely faster on a road course than an 800 rwhp monster. Work on reducing weight, getting the car balanced, proper suspension, and most importantly the driver factor................ a great driver can kick ass in a rental car...........

If the track will only be a small portion of what you do with the car and you need that power, then forced induction is the way to go.



Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank

Last edited by camcojb; 11-22-2008 at 08:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-22-2008, 12:20 PM
gearhead1186's Avatar
gearhead1186 gearhead1186 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

thanks jody. it wont be a dedicated track car, its just something I would like to do with the car and be somewhat "competitive." Im not gonna cry at night if it has a 51/49 weight distribution, I plan on a/c, a reasonable sound system, etc, etc.

I guess with that in mind, using a procharger or twin screw pushing not more than 10lbs should be more than enough on a forged ls7.

which type of blower would be most suited for track duty?
as I recall, you cant get the eaton 2300 unless you go through australia. so that pretty much just leaves the procharger if im correct?

thanks again for your help.

Last edited by gearhead1186; 11-22-2008 at 10:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-22-2008, 10:39 PM
tyoneal's Avatar
tyoneal tyoneal is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gearhead1186 View Post
Im building a 69 camaro with a max-g chassis frame. Its going to be a road course/street car. My goals is ~1000fwhp using and ls platform and twin turbos backed by a paddle shifted 4l80e.

Here is the pickle Im in. At that power level I have 3 choices of blocks..

1) GMPP Iron LSX --$2g ---- about 215lbs after machining
2) ERL prepped LS2 http://www.erlperformance.com/ -- $5200g ready for crank ----about 115 lbs after machining
3) LQ9/LQ4 6.0 liter truck block -- about $600 --- about 175lbs after machining

I would love to have an aluminum block since the tt setup will add even more weight but the price is a little extreme. Figuring a machined lsx block will be around 2600, the ERL prepped block is twice as much, another 2600.

Afer maching the LQ9/LQ4 will be about 1g and the ERL prepped block will cost me 4200 more.

Whats your opinion? I dont need to break any records, but I would like to be competitive in the road course. Iron or aluminum over the nose of the car?
====================================
The TT's are going to cost some bucks. Look at the engines Schwartz manufacturing makes. They are biult right, but your also looking at $22K worth of greenbacks. They have the power and are priced fairly.

1) The money that it will take to build the beast you want right, I think might be considerably higher than what your budgeting. (This does not include the Magicians who can build these on their own, and make them work right.)

2) If you really want a good road racing car, spend 80% of your money on the suspension and 20% on the engine. Recently I have found that a well sorted out car with 250 hp to the ground, can play hell with someone with 500 hp to the ground, and that doesn't even come near the 1000hp you are speaking of. With that hp, Drag Racing or Bonneville would be the right place for those types of engines.

What do the rest think, does this sound correct?

Ty


I think you might have one other issue to deal with.
__________________
Project, "EnGULFed"
1964 Gulf Liveried, Corvette, "Grand Sport"
===========================
Ty O'Neal
"She Devil" aka. Betty
1969/70 Camaro SS
427 LS3, 600
Keisler Road and Track T-56
Full size 3 link and custom roll cage
315mm tires on rear, should fit the same on front. Worked to design a more effective shape.
======================
"Chester's '65"
1965 Buick Riviera
Aiming for true PT Status with
the best available from the 70's and 80's
======================
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-22-2008, 10:50 PM
gearhead1186's Avatar
gearhead1186 gearhead1186 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

yes, thanks. If you read the above posts, I have since adjusted my goals and plans for the car.

I am leaning towards a n/a ls7 with 600rwhp with some juice for the heck of it.

or

a supercharged ls7 pushing no more than 10lbs of boost.

dont need more than 700rwhp.

what my question is now... being that the eaton 2300 isnt available to the public, im assuming the procharger is my only option. just want to make sure it will be reliable enough if i go the f/i route.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-23-2008, 12:41 AM
gearhead1186's Avatar
gearhead1186 gearhead1186 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yes, thank you. I remember reading that. I stand corrected.

Now that we have that out of the way, which blower is better suited for road racing.. the harrop 2300 or say a d1 or f1 procharger?

In regards to the ls7/ls3.. the wet sump on the ls3 can be converted to the ls7's dry sump correct? All thats needed is a longer crank, ls7 pump, timing cover etc? If thats the case I would gladly trade a couple cubes for a block with more meat.

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net