...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:24 PM
Nvrenuf's Avatar
Nvrenuf Nvrenuf is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Advice: Sequential distributor?

So I am in the middle of yanking my Accel Gen VI DFI. Replacing it with FAST. Hadn't really thought about it,but I'm at that point that I should decide. Should I go with a FAST sequential distributor for $350 or whatever? Or should I just "lock up" my MSD distributor and save the cash? (i'm turbo'd and doing this to be able to retard timing under boost) From what I understand, sequential really just gives me a lil better efficiency up to about 1500 RPM. Any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks!
__________________
Sikness: '64 Malibu, Twin Turbo (had to sell)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:37 PM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The FAST distributor will make it true plug and play, and sequential. All good things.
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2008, 05:11 AM
thedugan's Avatar
thedugan thedugan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 364
Thanks: 61
Thanked 128 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Whats the reason to yank the Accel setup?
__________________
Doug L.
68 Camaro RS/SS Conv. LSA/T56
67 Camaro RS LS2/T56 "NutKse"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2008, 06:49 AM
Nvrenuf's Avatar
Nvrenuf Nvrenuf is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It's an Accel Gen 6 (VI). It just old and antiquated and doesn't do what I want it to. (I have no idea why it was put in the car!) Most importantly, it does not have the control to retard timing under boost. The new Accel versions are much better, but I just decided to go with FAST for many reasons. Mostly "my tuner" is well versed in FAST and that's the most important part.
__________________
Sikness: '64 Malibu, Twin Turbo (had to sell)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2008, 06:59 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swchopper View Post
...should I just "lock up" my MSD distributor and save the cash?
I'm no expert on this, and maybe someone else can comment on this, but I believe you need to have a dual sync distributor to run sequential?
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2008, 07:24 AM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

If you want to run bank to bank injection (and it works fine), then your MSD distributor is fine. However you really should rephase the reluctor to rotor relationship such that the FAST receives the signal from the falling edge of the pickup at a crank lead angle of 55-60 degrees BTDC (ideal for a FAST) but then you want the rotor pointing directly at the cap terminals at the timing required at your peak torque/cylinder pressure to reduce the chances of a misfire. MSD sells the adjustable reluctor wheels.

The FAST distributor already has the reluctor to rotor relationship set internally at a 50 BTDC crank lead, and also has a 1x per rev cam sensor output so you can run sequential. The Accel Dual-Sync distributor is the same sort of thing however it has an adjustable rotor so you can easily alter the rotor phasing, however it requires a little bit of re-wiring & connector swapping to work with a FAST.

You can run sequential with an MSD distributor and a FAST, however it requires a crank trigger also. You clip all but 1 paddle on the reluctor wheel in the distributor so it serves as a cam sensor, and the crank trigger does the rest. This is more accurate than having the distributor signal everything as you don't have to deal with distributor gear lash, cam twist, timing chain slop, etc all bouncing the distributor around and leading to inaccuracies in the signal to the EFI box.
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 12-24-2008 at 09:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2008, 09:12 AM
Nvrenuf's Avatar
Nvrenuf Nvrenuf is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the valuable info. I am reading it over and over, letting it all sink in. It sounds like, due to my limited experience... If I just pay for the FAST distributor, everything is done for me. I know I could accomplish the same with my MSD, but whether I do it totally correctly is the question. I will study, but at this point Im leaning towards FAST dist.
__________________
Sikness: '64 Malibu, Twin Turbo (had to sell)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2008, 11:56 AM
slammed con slammed con is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: san antonio texas
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default sequential

run sequential and buy yhr distributor make life so easy
__________________
BUILT NOT PAY TO GET BUILT
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-24-2008, 02:37 PM
vipercuda vipercuda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 186
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swchopper View Post
So I am in the middle of yanking my Accel Gen VI DFI. Replacing it with FAST. Hadn't really thought about it,but I'm at that point that I should decide. Should I go with a FAST sequential distributor for $350 or whatever? Or should I just "lock up" my MSD distributor and save the cash? (i'm turbo'd and doing this to be able to retard timing under boost) From what I understand, sequential really just gives me a lil better efficiency up to about 1500 RPM. Any thoughts or suggestions? Thanks!
If Bob says do it, take his advice do it..... He will not steer you wrong... I get a ride once it is completed...

Happy Holidays
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-24-2008, 04:30 PM
Nvrenuf's Avatar
Nvrenuf Nvrenuf is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hey Mike! Believe me, I do whatever Bob says. But on this one, he has said it's a toss up and its just up to me. What an awesome guy he is though! Merry Christmas to you also.
__________________
Sikness: '64 Malibu, Twin Turbo (had to sell)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net