...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 05-05-2009, 03:23 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Looks good, as I was reading the first couple of posts I was saying to myself, "he's going to have to modify the K-Member...." LOL! Glad you are going this route, it will look so much better.
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 05-05-2009, 03:54 PM
tjbruning tjbruning is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 466
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by syborg tt View Post
I agree - the ride height was high. Are you going to have to notch the rear frame to tuck the axle ?
No, plenty of clearance between the axle and the frame rail. After modifying the upper shock mounts, there will be ~3 1/2" of clearance at the new ride height.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 05-05-2009, 03:58 PM
tjbruning tjbruning is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 466
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Musclerodz View Post
As many K members i have heard about being modified this way, I am suprised they have not changed the design. looks awesome
Most of the Mopar suspension kits are designed to bolt-in with minimal fabrication. Ned's already past the point of no return...
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 05-05-2009, 04:00 PM
DRJDVM's '69's Avatar
DRJDVM's '69 DRJDVM's '69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 26 Posts
Default

No I shouldnt have to notch the frame in the rear...its not going to be that low... I think ...I may have the notch the rear crossmember so the pumpkin doesnt hit....but I think the axle tubes should be fine

As for the k-frame design....the RMS (and the other 2....Magnumforce and XV) is really designed for "less aggressive stance" of a car...i.e not running 19 inch front rims and 20 rears.....not shooting for the total "in the weeds" look etc. It has a much bigger market of the "average guy" thay just wants to get rid of the 30 year old torsion bar style suspension in the Mopars...plus there are just fewer guys cutting up Mopars and doing wild stuff... their numbers are growing but not nearly as many as Chevy and Ford etc.

So I cant fault RMS for staying more "in the middle of the road" for their design
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 05-05-2009, 06:51 PM
bentfab's Avatar
bentfab bentfab is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruning Auto Design View Post
Most of the Mopar suspension kits are designed to bolt-in with minimal fabrication. Ned's already past the point of no return...
Know the feeling !! This started out as an XV back half. What's left is the lower control arms and shocks.
__________________
Follow us on Instagram = @bentcustom

www.bentcustomandperformance.com

Last edited by bentfab; 11-08-2010 at 11:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:34 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Mark that is a sweet setup you have there.
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 05-05-2009, 10:14 PM
DRJDVM's '69's Avatar
DRJDVM's '69 DRJDVM's '69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 26 Posts
Default

yeah with the old 20/20 hindsight, I should have just bought the Shockwaves and had everything fabricated custom. Probably would have been close to a wash as far as overall price....

Well probably not....but the overall custom design may have been worth the extra $$....mounts on th rearend rather than bolt on with U-bolts etc etc etc...

One comment on the Air Ride.... the plate that holds the U-bolts is bending already...would have been nice to be alittle thicker.... I'll fix that once I get the rearend finalized.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 05-05-2009, 10:51 PM
bentfab's Avatar
bentfab bentfab is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwhite692 View Post
Mark that is a sweet setup you have there.
Thanks alot.
__________________
Follow us on Instagram = @bentcustom

www.bentcustomandperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 05-06-2009, 06:18 AM
MoparCar MoparCar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 245
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

With the lowering of the car in the rear, will you have to modify your outer wheel tubs for clearance? Basically doing a "bump" to the outer to make room for the tire? The mini tub does the inside nicely but so many mopars are tight on the outer. Without sucking the tires in they are very close to the outer tub as I'm sure you know. I'm building a Challenger and I keep looking at this while doing mock up that's why I'm asking and looking for ideas from a Pro Build.....

Thanks! Wes
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 05-06-2009, 11:27 AM
96z28ss's Avatar
96z28ss 96z28ss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 2,024
Thanks: 18
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Does look nice, lower.

When are you going to get wheels for the car?
__________________
1969 Camaro LS2/T56 D1SC
www.automotivedesigneng.com
Special thanks to: DPE Wheel / Columbia Parts Company / US Collision / T. Bruning
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net